Sensory Processing Sensitivity and Children Development  in the Context of Environmental Sensitivity

Yilin Hu

doi:10.54097/ehss.v8i.4649

Authors

Yilin Hu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4649

Keywords:

Environmental sensitivity; Sensory processing sensitivity; Children development; Interventions.

Abstract

Studies proved that people vary greatly in their sensitivity to the environment, and some are more sensitive than others. Aron et al. proposed the Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) model to explain individual differences in sensitivity from the perspective of environmental information processing depth, which has recently been incorporated within a meta-framework of Environmental Sensitivity. In the field of children development research, children’s SPS is gradually understood as an important marker of children’s environmental sensitivity, and about 30% of children have a high-sensitive trait characterized by deeper processing of environmental information, increased emotional and physiological reactivity, greater awareness of environmental subtleties, and ease to be overstimulated. Recently, SPS and the highly sensitive child have gained great popularity in public and academia. This article reviews the theoretical framework and measurements of SPS of children, summarizing the relationship between SPS and children’s development outcomes and the moderating role SPS plays in children’s development. Future research needs to focus on the prevention and intervention of negative effects related to SPS and harness its positive potential to promote children’s well-being.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Corina U.Greven, Francesca Lionetti, Charlotte Booth, Elaine Aron, Elaine Fox, Haline E. Schendan, Michael Pluess, Hilgo Bruining, Bianca Acevedo, Patricia Bijttebier, & Judith Homberg. Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: a critical review and development of research agenda. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2019, 98: 287-305.

Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1997, 73(2): 345-368.

Monroe, S. M , Simons, et al. Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: Implications for the depressive. Psychological Bulletin, 1991, 110(3): 406-425.

Belsky J. & Pluess M. Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 2009, 135(6): 885-908.

Ellis B. J. & Boyce W. T. Biological Sensitivity to Context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2010, 17(3): 183-187.

Pluess M. & Belsky J. Vantage sensitivity: individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 2013, 139(4): 901-916.

Pluess M. Individual Differences in Environmental Sensitivity Child Development Perspectives, 2015, 9(3): 138-143.

Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. Sensory processing sensitivity: a review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and social psychology review: an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 2012, 16(3): 262–282.

Zhenhong Wang, Xiaoxiao Wang, & Caina Li. Different environment sensitivity of children: developmental theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), 2020, (04): 36-47.

Pluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F., Lester, K.J., Krapohl, E., Aron, E.N., & Aron, A. Environmental Sensitivity in Children: Development of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale and Identification of Sensitivity Groups. Developmental Psychology, 2018, 54: 51–70.

Belsky, J., Jonassaint, C., Pluess, M., Stanton, M., Brummett, B., & Williams, R. Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes?. Molecular psychiatry, 2009, 14(8): 746–754.

Aron, E. N., 2002. The Highly Sensitive Child. Broadway Book. Thorsons., USA.

Boterberg, S., & Warreyn, P. Making sense of it all: The impact of sensory processing sensitivity on daily functioning of children. Personality and Individual Differences, 2016, 92: 80-86.

Pluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F., Lester, K. J., Krapohl, E., Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. Environmental sensitivity in children: Development of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale and identification of sensitivity groups. Developmental psychology, 2018, 54(1): 51–70.

Lionetti, F., Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Burns, G. L., Jagiellowicz, J., & Pluess, M. Dandelions, tulips and orchids: evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Transl Psychiatry, 2018, 8(1): 24.

Sofie Weyn, Karla Van Leeuwen, Michael Pluess, Francesca Lionetti, Corina U. Greven, Luc Goossens, Hilde Colpin, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Karine Verschueren, Margot Bastin, Elke Van Hoof, Filip De Fruyt, & Patricia Bijttebier. Psychometric properties of the Highly Sensitive Child scale across developmental stage, gender, and country. Current Psychology, 2021, 40: 3309-3325.

Lionetti, F., Aron, E.N., Aron, A., Klein, D.N., &Pluess, M. Observer-rated environmental sensitivity moder-ates children’s response to parenting quality in early childhood. Developmental Psychology,2019, 55(11),2389–2402.

David E. Evans, & Mary K. Rothbart. Temperamental sensitivity: Two constructs or one? Personality and Individual Differences, 2008, 44(1): 108-118.

Miriam Liss, Laura Timmel, Kelin Baxley, & Patrick Killingsworth. Sensory processing sensitivity and its relation to parental bonding, anxiety, and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 2005, 39(8): 1429-1439.

Charlotte Booth, Helen Standage, Elaine Fox,Sensory-processing sensitivity moderates the association between childhood experiences and adult life satisfaction, Personality and Individual Differences, 2015, 87: 24-29.

Elaine N. Aron. Adult Shyness: The Interaction of Temperamental Sensitivity and an Adverse Childhood Environment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2005, 31(2): 181-197.

Slagt Meike, Dubas Judith Semon, van Aken Marcel A.G., Ellis Bruce J, Deković Maja. Sensory processing sensitivity as a marker of differential susceptibility to parenting. Developmental psychology, 2018, 54(3): 543-558.

Scrimin S., Osler G., Pozzoli T., Moscardino U., Early adversities, family support, and child well-being: The moderating role of environmental sensitivity, Child Care Health and Development, 2018, 44(6): 885-891.

Sofie Weyn, Karla Van Leeuwen, Michael Pluess, Luc Goossens, Stephan Claes, Guy Bosmans, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Erika Lutin, Anne Sophie Bröhl, Viktoria Chubar, Flore Geukens, Patricia Bijttebier, Individual differences in environmental sensitivity at physiological and phenotypic level: Two sides of the same coin? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2022, 176: 36-53.

Michael Pluess & Ilona Boniwell. Sensory-Processing Sensitivity predicts treatment response to a school-based depression prevention program: Evidence of Vantage Sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 2015, 82: 40-45.

Annalaura Nocentini, Ersilia Menesini, Michael Pluess. The Personality Trait of Environmental Sensitivity Predicts Children’s Positive Response to School-Based Antibullying Intervention. Clinical Psychological Science,2018,6(6):848–859.

Iimura Shuhei & Kibe Chieko. Highly sensitive adolescent benefits in positive school transitions: Evidence for vantage sensitivity in Japanese high-schoolers. Developmental psychology, 2020, 56(8): 40-45.