Analyze Russia's Foreign Relations with Three Main Theories of International Relations

Authors

  • Yuwei Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v1i.625

Keywords:

Russia, International relations, Neorealism, Neoliberalism, Constructivism.

Abstract

With the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Russia's foreign relations and diplomatic strategy have become the focus of academic research. However, previous studies on Russian diplomatic relations tend to start from a single theoretical perspective. Although this approach is detailed and in-depth enough, countries do not develop diplomatic strategies from a single perspective, so it is difficult to fully explain Russia's diplomatic motives from a single perspective. This paper will analyze Russia's foreign relations, and speculate the deep needs and diplomatic logic of The Russian authorities in the Russia-Ukraine crisis from the three mainstream theories. The analysis method this paper adopted was literature review, and all papers cited were from CNKI and Google Scholar. Through the analysis and comparison, it is obvious that Russia mainly maintains the neorealist diplomatic strategy in the conflict with Ukraine. Russia aims to maintain the neutral status of Ukraine and promote the establishment of an alliance to compete with the US-led NATO countries. From the perspective of the three major theories, this paper comprehensively analyzes Russia's foreign relations, which is conducive to providing a new analytical perspective for the Conflict between Russia and Ukraine. It can rationally view the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and have a deeper understanding of the role and purpose of Russia in the conflict, so as to provide help for the settlement of the conflict.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lu ping. 30 years of Russian foreign policy evolution [J]. Journal of Russian Studies, 2021, 11 (06): 38-58.

Xiong Qian. Changes and Prospects of the Current International System under the View of Neo-realism’s International Cooperation Theory [J]. Chongqing and the World (Academic Edition), 2013, 30 (07): 35-36+45.

Jiao Bing. New Realism and Appraisal on It: in the Perspective of Philosophy of Science [D]. Central China Normal University, 2006.

Li Jieyu. Rationality and Deficiency of Woltz School of Neorealism -- Also comment on Poverty of Neorealism [J]. Journal of Tianjin institute of administration, 2012, 14 (04): 32-37.

Zhu Lumin, Zhou Guanwen. From Disputation to Integration: Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (social science edition), 2007 (4): 57 to 60.

Powell R. Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debate[J]. International organization, 1994, 48 (2): 313-344.

Guo Feng. Understanding Neoliberalism in Comparison with Neorealism [J]. Journal of the University of International Relations, 2002 (05): 8-12.

Robert O K. New Realism and Its Criticism [M]. Peking University Press. 2002: 180-181

Liu Chunjie. Russia's Interest in BRICS Mechanism: A Constructivist Perspective [J]. Russian, Eastern European and Central Asian Studies, 2016 (04): 28-40+156.

Utzig S M. What is the Mainspring of the BRICS? A Constructivist Analysis [J].

Nye J S. Neorealism and neoliberalism [J]. World politics, 1988, 40 (2): 235-251.

Guo Shuyong. A Milestone in the History of Theoretical Criticism of Contemporary International Relations -- Comment on New Realism and Its Criticism edited by Keohan [J]. American Research, 2003 (01): 137-148.

Kim H Z. Theory of International Cooperation—Debate between Neorealism and Neoliberalism [J]. International Forum, 2004 (05): 1-6+79.

Gong Baisong. Contemporary Value of Constructivism International Relations Theory [J]. Journal of Jianghan petroleum workers university, 2014, 27 (06): 68-70.

Wang Gonglong. Contribution and Deficiency of Winter's Constructivism theory [J]. World Economics and Politics, 2002 (05): 34-39.

Zheng Ailong, Sui Junyu. An analysis of Russia-Europe relations from the perspective of neo-realism [J]. Academic forum, 2015, 38 (08): 52-55.

Zaslavskaya N. EU-Russia relations: a theoretical interpretation of Russia’s perception of the European Union [J]. Studia Politologiczne, 2020, 56 (56): 195-212.

Federation of American Scientists. The Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation. June 28. 2000. https://fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/doctrine/econcept.html

Meng Jun. Arab Spring and Russian Diplomatic Strategies Towards the Middle East [J]. Arab World Studies, 2021 (03): 32-49+158.

Stepanova E. Russia in the Middle East: Back to a “Grand Strategy” or Enforcing Multilateralism [J]. Politique étrangère, 2016, 2: 1-14.

Концепцияучастия Российской Федерации в объединении БРИКС. February 9. 2013. http://news.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/41d452a8a232b2f6f8a5.pdf

Wendt A. Social theory of international politics [M]. Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Downloads

Published

06-07-2022

How to Cite

Zhang, Y. (2022). Analyze Russia’s Foreign Relations with Three Main Theories of International Relations. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1, 27-33. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v1i.625