Issues on Sentencing of Network Service Providers in Cybercrime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v1i.646Keywords:
Criminal Responsibilities, Network Service Providers, Cybercrime.Abstract
With the continuous progress of science and technology, the problem of conviction and sentencing of network service providers in the field of cybercrime has become increasingly prominent. In judicial practice, there are often different judgments in the same case, ambiguous sentences in the judgment, and ambiguous qualitative nature of the subject of the crime, which shows that the path of conviction and sentencing of network service providers needs to be improved. Through analyzing the current laws and regulations concerning network service providers in China, the lack of classification of network service providers and the application of relevant sentencing laws are the main obstacles to the conviction and sentencing of network service providers. It is suggested to solve the practical obstacles of conviction and sentencing of network service providers by classifying network service providers, limiting the crime of helping information network crimes, strictly controlling the information network security management obligations of network service providers, and perfecting the relevant legal provisions on the obligations of network service providers.
Downloads
References
Yang Caixia. Thinking on the Categorization of Criminal Liability of network Service Providers [J]. Law, 2018, 6(4):162-172.
Deng Jinting. Classification of criminal assistance in Cyberspace -- Inspiration from Judicial Decisions [J]. Chinese Journal of Law, 2019, 6(4):138-156.
Wang Wenhua. Application analysis of crime of refusing to perform information network security management obligations [J]. People's Procuratorate, 2016, 24(6):24-27.
Yu Chong. Demarcation of criminal liability for omission of network service providers from the perspective of "dichotomy" [J]. Contemporary Law, 2019, 6(5):13-26.
Zhang Hui. Research on legal application of charges related to cybercrime [J]. Modern Law, 2019, 6(4):156-167.
Chen Hongbin. On the criminal boundary of technology-neutral behaviour [J]. Journal of Nantong University (Social Science Edition), 2019, 6(1):58-65.
Wang Huawei. Identification path of Criminal liability of network Service Providers -- Also comment on the related disputes of Qvod Case [J]. Journal of National Procuratorial College, 2017, 6(5):3-32+173.
Pi Yong. On the management obligation and criminal responsibility of network Service Providers [J]. Studies in law and business, 2017, 6(5):14-25.
Wang Ying. Research on the Attribution model of Network information crime [J]. Peking University Law Journal, 2018, 6 (5):1302-1323.
Qi Wenyuan, Liu Yang. Criminal Law regulation of Network platform providers [J]. Law Science, 2017, 6(3):106-114.
Xie Wangyuan. On the crime of refusing to perform information network security management obligations [J]. China Legal Science, 2017, 6(2) :238-255.
Liu Yanhong. Innocent QVOd and Guilty Thinking -- Reflection and criticism on the theory of guilt in "Qvod Case" [J]. Politics and Law, 2016, 12(12):104-112.
Wang Huawei. Comparative study on criminal Liability of network Service Providers [J]. Global Law Review, 2016, 12(4):41-56.
Tu Longke. Online content management obligations and criminal liability of network service providers [J]. Law review, 2016, 6(3): 66-73.
Guo Zeqian, Zhang Man. A Preliminary Study on the Criminal Responsibility of network Service Providers -- Centered on the punishment of neutral Helping Behaviour [J]. Research on Juvenile Delinquency Prevention, 2016, 6(2):74-84.
Lu Xu. Criminal liability and development of network service providers -- Comments on the relevant provisions of The Criminal Law Amendment (ix) [J]. Rule of Law Studies, 2015, 6(6):61-67.
Tu Longke. Criminal liability model of network service providers and its relationship analysis [J]. Politics and Law, 2016, 6(4):108-115.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






