Antitrust Regulation in the Field of IP of MNEs in the New Era: Starting with the Patent Tying Behaviour from the Perspective of Comparative Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v1i.661Keywords:
Antitrust, Abuse of Market Ascendancy, Abuse of Intellectual Property, Patent Tying, MNEsAbstract
With the vigorous development of patented technology, the problem of some large multinational enterprises implementing monopoly behaviour by abusing intellectual property rights such as patent tying is becoming more and more prominent. This has had a great impact on fair market competition, especially in those developing countries. Combined with the regulation of China’s Antitrust Law and other legal systems on this issue at the present stage, and based on the analysis of its imperfections, this paper explores the excellent achievements in international attempts such as the principle of the rationality of the United States and the comprehensive analysis method of the European Union. In the context of TRIPS, countries all over the world need to pay close attention to how to regulate the monopoly caused by the abuse of intellectual property rights, including patent tying. It is concluded that to better resist the monopoly of abusing intellectual property rights and develop the new driving force of a domestic innovative economy, China needs to start with the substantive concept and clarify the clear meaning, definition standards, and rank order of relevant legal concepts and systems. It also needs to up special authoritative law enforcement agencies to regulate the monopoly of multinational enterprises abusing intellectual property rights, innovate their punishment methods, strengthen the punishment, and better ensure fair market competition.
Downloads
References
Dennis Carlton, Jeffrey Perloff. Modern Industrial Organization [M]. Pearson Press, 2004.
Alden F. Abbott and Joshua D. Wright. Antitrust analysis of tying arrangements and exclusive dealing [J]. Antitrust Law and Economics, 2010, 4(8): 183-212.
GUO Dezhong. The Tying Arrangement in Patent Licenses [J]. Hebei Law Science, 2007, 25(9): 93-98
FENG Jiang, Antitrust law and practice of abusing market dominant position [M]. Law Press China, 2020.
Jay Dratler, Jr. Licensing of Intellectual Property [M]. Law Journal Press, 1994.
NING Lizhi, GONG Tao. Theoretical Analysis of the Case of FTC v. Qualcomm [J]. Wuhan University International Law Review, 2021, 2021(4): 119-138.
ZHAO Shuwen and WANG Jiawei. analysis of monopoly (restrictive competition behaviour) of multinational corporations and regulation of antitrust law [J]. politics and law, 2007, 2007(1): 21-25.
Rico Valderrama DOMINGO. Multinational Corporations and the Philippine Antitrust Policy: An Appraisal [J]. Philippine Law Journal, 1985, 60: 116-152.
ZHANG Weijun. Research on the legal system of regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights [M]. Intellectual property press, 2008.
Alison K. Hayden. Patent Tying Agreements: Presumptively Illegal [J]. John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, 2005, 5(1): 94-119.
A.E. Rodriguez, Malcolm B. Coate. Limits to Antitrust Policy for Reforming Economies [J]. Houston Journal of International Law, 1996, 18(2):312-357.
Thomas E. Kauper. Antitrust Enforcement from the Inside [J]. Antitrust Law Journal, 45(1): 154-162
MEI Shuwen, HAO Shibo and SUO Futao. Empirical Research on Intellectual Property Management in Internet Industry [M]. Intellectual Property Press, 2019.
ZHANG Jiwen. Study on the Regulation of Anti-monopoly Law of Patent Tying Behavior--Analysis “Patent Equipment + Material” Tying [J]. Electronic intellectual property, 2016, 2016(12): 43-49.
Alan Dunlop. Conventional TRIPS [J]. Juta's Business Law, 1994, 2(3): 137-138.
Jacob R. Osborn. A View of the Hierarchy of Patent Rights, Trips, and the Canadian Patent Act [J]. Akron Intellectual Property Journal, 2010, 4(2): 261-280.
Research group of Shanghai First Intermediate People’s court. The path and mechanism of Chinese courts participating in the construction of the extraterritorial application of Chinese law system [J]. Application of law, 2021, 2021(1): 157-168.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






