A Comparative Study on the Application of Group Liability in the Field of Environmental Torts between China and the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v1i.662Keywords:
Environmental Tort, Group Liability, CERCLA.Abstract
As the biggest developing country, China is relatively lagging in the development of laws on environmental protection. With the increasing impact on the environment bring by the enterprises, the application of group liability in the field of environmental torts has become an urgent legal issue to be solved. This paper uses case the study method, the comparative method, and literature study method, taking Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act in the United States as an example, to compare the cases, legislation, and judicial practice of China and the United States in this problem. It is concluded that the current Chinese legislation on group liability and corporate environmental responsibility is insufficient, which affects the application of group liability in environmental tort cases. Based on these shortcomings, this paper draws on the experience of CERCLA and proposes suggestions for improving China’s legislation on this issue. A relatively detailed two-step plan is arranged, including improving and perfecting the existing system of piercing the corporate veil and introducing the Environmental Liability Law.
Downloads
References
LIN Xue, LIU Jia. Research on Corporate Personality Denial and Explanation to Tort Liability in Environmental Pollution Cases [J]. Journal of Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, 2018 (02): 66 - 72.
FENG Ru. Piercing the Parent-subsidiary Corporate Veil in Environmental Tort Cases [J]. Hebei Law Science, 2014, 32 (02): 158 - 168.
U.S. v. Kayser-Roth Corp. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island.
Charles de Saillan. CERCLA Liability for Pre-Enactment Disposal Activities: Nothing Has Changed [J]. NAAG National Environmental Enforcement, 1996, 11 (09).
Martin Petrin, Barnali Choudhury. Group company liability [J]. European Business Organization Law Review, 2018, 19 (4).
LI Dongmei. On the Standard of Environmental Liability in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of the United States [J]. Journal of Changchun Municipal Party School, 2010 (06): 90 - 94.
George W. Dent Jr. Limited Liability in Environmental Law [J]. Wake Forest Law Review, 1991, 26 (1): 151 - 182.
LI Hao. A Preliminary Discussion on Environmental Restoration Liability in American Law-Focusing on the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act[J]. Rule of Law Research, 2020 (02): 131 - 146.
MA Jingli. On the parent company’s commitment to the environmental responsibility of its subsidiaries [J]. Journal of Henan Institute of Science and Technology, 2016, 16 (11): 77.
Brad M. Viergever. Environmental Liability: Trustees Beware [J]. Detroit College of Law Review, 1992 (4): 1101 - 1126.
Lee C. Hodge and Andrew B. Sachs. Empirical Study Piercing the Mist: Bringing the Thompson Study into the 1990s [J]. Wake Forest Law Review, 2008, 43 (1): 341.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






