The Restriction of the Basic Rights of Netizens——Basic on the Expansion of the Safe Harbor Principle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v11i.7510Keywords:
safe harbor principle; imputation; constitutionality; gatekeeper system.Abstract
The provisions of the safe harbor principle in the Civil Code greatly expand its scope of application, which makes the ISPs more room to reduce the liability for compensation. On the contrary, the concept of indirect infringement has a different liability which causes the probability of nuisance obligation of the ISP greatly increase. In addition, because the provisions of other department laws tend to remedy the rights of right holders, the risk of relief liability of the ISP is increased in practical practice. ISPs by the light of nature reduce legal costs, and necessary measures in advance become the most economical and effective means. Moreover, the combination of the natural power of the ISP and the hierarchy of public power makes the behavior of the ISP eventually become a means to protect rights by restricting other obliges’ rights and naturally fall into the stage of constitutionality review. This paper intends to refute the traditional ideal of the safe harbor principle to introduce the movement of the contrary of such a principle. Based on the theory, this paper will provide a way to improve the system of ISPs’ liability for online Infringement.
Downloads
References
Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, 1998, 10, 29, Retrieved on 2022,11, 23, Retrieved from: http://182.150.59.104:8888/https/77726476706e69737468656265737421e7e056d2373b7d5c7f1fc7af9758/iel/129a6495598da869c2c5015fc9663780bdfb.html?keyword=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%8D%83%E5%B9%B4%E7%89%88%E6%9D%83%E6%B3%95%E6%A1%88&way=listView
Regulation on the Protection of the Right of Communication to the Public on Information Networks, 2006,5,18, Retrieved on 2022,11,23, Retrieved from: http://182.150.59.104:8888/https/77726476706e69737468656265737421e7e056d2373b7d5c7f1fc7af9758/en_law/916bf1c1df373ab3bdfb.html
Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, 2020,5,28, Retrieved on 2022,11,23, Retrieved from: http://182.150.59.104:8888/https/77726476706e69737468656265737421e7e056d2373b7d5c7f1fc7af9758/en_law/aa00daaeb5a4fe4ebdfb.html
Yu Jinan, "The Liability of ISPs for Nuisance: Proportionality as the Center", Chinese and Foreign Law, No.6, 2021.
Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China (2020 Amendment) 2020,12,26, Retrieved on 2022,11,23, Retrieved from: http://182.150.59.104:8888/https/77726476706e69737468656265737421e7e056d2373b7d5c7f1fc7af9758/en_law/39c1b78830b970eabdfb.html
Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues concerning the Concrete Application of Law in the Handling of Criminal Cases of Making, Reproducing, Publishing, Selling and Spreading Pornographic Electronic Information by Means of the Internet, Terminal of Mobile Communications and Sound Message Stations 2004,9,3, Retrieved on 2022,11,23, Retrieved from: 7d5c7f1fc7af9758/en_law/9e184012e38436f0bdfb.html
Interpretation (II) of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate of Several Issues on the Specific Application of Law in the Handling of Criminal Cases about Producing, Reproducing, Publishing, Selling and Disseminating Pornographic Electronic Information via the Internet, Mobile Communication Terminals and Sound Message Stations. 2010,2,2, Retrieved on 2022,11,23, Retrieved from: http://182.150.59.104:8888/https/77726476706e69737468656265737421e7e056d2373b7d5c7f1fc7af9758/en_law/f38065619ed42eacbdfb.html
Wang Huawei. "The Construction of the Doctrine of Safe Haven in Criminal Law", Chinese and Foreign Law, No.6, 2019.
Xiong Qi, "Comparative Experience and Local Characteristics of" Notice-Necessary Measures "Obligations in Copyright Law," Journal of Soochow University (Law Edition), No.1, 2022.
Xie Yinghao: Value Conception and Rule Reflection on Information Control and Governance of We-Media Platforms, Internal Reference of Entertainment Law, No. 15, 2022.
Zhu Yan. "The Change of Social Foundation and the Construction of the Dual System of Civil Law", Social Sciences in China, No.6, 2010
Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948,13,10, Retrieved on 2022,11,23, Retrieved from: http://182.150.59.104:8888/https/77726476706e69737468656265737421e7e056d2373b7d5c7f1fc7af9758/en_treaties/44e42198bf86e3f9dc8dd7af487dc7febdfb.html
INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS 1966,12,16, Retrieved on 2022,11,23, Retrieved from: http://182.150.59.104:8888/https/77726476706e69737468656265737421e7e056d2373b7d5c7f1fc7af9758/en_treaties/95fe0e23403a68540ec15104374c0026bdfb.html
Zhang Xiang and Tian Wei: Review Framework of Fundamental Rights Cases (I): Introduction 2021,12,13 Retrieved on 2022,11,23, Retrieved from: https://www.aisixiang.com/data/130304.html
Constitution of the People's Republic of China (2018 Amendment) 2018,3,11, Retrieved on 2022,11,23, Retrieved from: http://182.150.59.104:8888/https/77726476706e69737468656265737421e7e056d2373b7d5c7f1fc7af9758/en_law/7c7e81f43957c58bbdfb.html
Zhang Xiang, "The Logic of Public Interest Restricting Basic Rights", Law Forum, Vol. 1, 2005
Lewin, Kuit, “Forces Behind Food Habits and Methods of Change”. Bulletin of the National Research Council, 1943,108:35-65
Digital Markets Act. 2022,7,5, Retrieved on 2022,11,23, Retrieved from: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Markets_Act
Zhou Hanhua: Analysis of the Gatekeeper Clause in the Personal Information Protection Law, Law Science, No.5, 2022.
Personal Information Protection Law of the People's Republic of China 2021,11,1, Retrieved on 2022,11,23, Retrieved from: http://182.150.59.104:8888/https/77726476706e69737468656265737421e7e056d2373b7d5c7f1fc7af9758/en_law/d653ed619d0961c0bdfb.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
