Determination of Materiality of Misrepresentation of Securities after Elimination of Preliminary Procedures

Yuxin Li; Yifan Wang

doi:10.54097/ehss.v11i.7526

Authors

Yuxin Li
Yifan Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v11i.7526

Keywords:

Materiality, administrative penalties, price sensitivity.

Abstract

The new regulations on securities misrepresentation in China at the beginning of 2022 have clearly eliminated the need for the antecedent procedure, which has made the issue of the criteria for determining the materiality of securities misrepresentation ambiguous in academic circles, including in judicial practice. In this study, the authors focus on the issue of the criteria for determining the materiality of securities misrepresentation after the elimination of the antecedent procedure. In the course of the study, the authors mainly adopted the thesis analysis method and the case analysis method. Through analyzing the literature, the views of different scholars are combined with actual cases, and finally came to the conclusions. The significance of this study lies in the discussion and clarification of the standard of materiality determination after the elimination of the antecedent procedure, which will provide partial guidance for the academic discussion and judicial practice encountered in this issue.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ding Yuxiang. The spokes effect of the elimination of securities misrepresentation front procedure and its treatment[J]. Finance and Economics Law, 2021(05):31-46.

Zhu L, Fu Fuxing. The path of determining the materiality of securities misrepresentation after the elimination of the prior procedure--a practical analysis based on the perspective of claim rights[J]. Financial Market Research,2022(07):31-40.

Chen Jie. Judicial response to the elimination of the antecedent procedure of securities civil compensation lawsuit: the perspective of civil compensation for misrepresentation[J]. Securities Market Herald,2021(05):63-70+78.

Li Youxing, Qian Hao Yu, Meng Sheng. Research on the trial system of securities misrepresentation tort compensation cases--a review of the high-end forum on the understanding and application of the new judicial interpretation[J]. Legal Application,2022(03):171-184.

Li Hailong. Research on the antecedent procedure of civil compensation lawsuit for securities misrepresentation: a perspective of the changing relationship between public and private enforcement [J]. Journal of China University of Political Science and Law, 2021(02):148-165.

Liao Sheng. The tort of misrepresentation tort liability [J]. Jurist,2017(01):134-145+179.

Lei JP, Li XY. A New Exploration of Securities Misrepresentation Liability (II): Wandering and Choosing the Materiality Standard,2022-09-27

Zhang Baosheng, Zhou Wei, Zhu Yuanyuan, Xiao Qiang, "Securities Misrepresentation Civil Litigation Case 2019 Annual Observation and Foresight", ,Zhonglun Opinions, 2020-03-07. Securities Misrepresentation Civil Litigation Case 2019 Annual Observation and Foresight - Zhonglun Law Firm (zhonglun.com)

Zhu Qian. The identification of the elements of civil liability for securities misrepresentation after the abolition of the pre-procedure [J]. Journal of Fujian Financial Management Cadre College, 2022(02):8-15.

Chang Liyang. Criteria for determining the materiality of the content of misrepresentation. People's Court Newspaper, 2022-07-21 Criteria for Determining the Materiality of Misrepresentation Content - China Court (chinacourt.org)