The Conflict between Dionysian and Apollonian in the Last Two Stanzas of Ode to a Nightingale from the Perspective of Classical Reception

Authors

  • Xiaorui Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v12i.7603

Keywords:

John Keats; ‘Ode to a Nightingale’; nightingale; Dionysian; Apollonian.

Abstract

John Keats, one of the famous Romantic poets in England, wrote many famous poems in his life, among which the odes highlighted his literary and aesthetic attainments. Keats’s Ode to a Nightingale is beautiful and fluent, which differs from the imitation of ancient Greek works in the early years. Keats naturally integrates the ancient Greek colour in this poem, puts the narrator in the jungle so that the reader can listen to the nightingale singing along with the narrator, and engender the reader to appreciate the sadness at the end of the whole poem. During such a process, Keats’s emotional changes and conflicts are highlighted. Because the entire poem has ups and downs, a double interpretation can reflect the aesthetic value of Keats’s poem. It profoundly reflects Nietzsche’s Dionysian and Apollonian dialectics. This thesis aims to interpret Keats’s Ode to a Nightingale from two perspectives rather than a single emotional description and further extend the formation of Keats’s writing style. The tribulations in life and the social changes in that era comprise the conflicts in Keats’s poems, especially in Ode to a Nightingale, leaving readers a profound room to savour the tragic and fancy motif in the poetry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fogle, Richard Harter. Keats’s Ode to a Nightingale. PMLA, 1953, 68(1): 211–22.

Schneider, Evelyn. Keats and Nietzsche. New York University, 2003.

Shepherd, Melanie. Myth, Perspective, and Affirmation in Nietzsche’s Birth of Tragedy. History of European Ideas, July 2018, 44(5): 75–89.

Kappel, Andrew J. "The Immortality of the Natural: Keats' 'Ode to a Nightingale.'" ELH, 1978, 45(2): 270–84.

Chernaik, Judith. Keats and Charles Brown’s Memoir: Was Keats’s Nightingale Really a Thrush?’ The Keats-Shelley Review, 2021, 35(1): 56–63.

Latter, Alex. “An Untoward Fate”: On Keats’s Posthumous Prosification. The Keats-Shelley Review, 2012, 26(1): 13–19.

Mandel, Siegfried. The Nightingale in the Loom of Life. Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 1976, 9(3): 117–34.

E. Douka Kabitoglou. Adapting Philosophy to Literature: The Case of John Keats. Studies in Philology, 1992, 89(1): 115–36.

Markotic, Lorraine. A Visual Dionysian: Nietzsche’s Aesthetics and Pan’s Labyrinth. Comparative and Continental Philosophy, 2016, 8(2): 180–98.

Corcoran, Brendan. Keats’ Death: Towards a Posthumous Poetics. Studies in Romanticism, 2009, 48(2): 321–48.

Esterhammer, Angela. The Cosmopolitan Improvvisatore: Spontaneity and Performance in Romantic Poetics. European Romantic Review, 2005, 16(2): 153–65.

Wilson, Douglas B. Reading the Urn: Death in Keats’s Arcadia. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, 1985, 25(4): 823–44.

Downloads

Published

19-04-2023

How to Cite

Chen, X. (2023). The Conflict between Dionysian and Apollonian in the Last Two Stanzas of Ode to a Nightingale from the Perspective of Classical Reception. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 12, 83-87. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v12i.7603