Extended study about model in game theory

Ruizhe Li; Jingxiang Peng

doi:10.54097/ehss.v2i.766

Authors

Ruizhe Li
Jingxiang Peng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v2i.766

Keywords:

Prisoner’s dilemma, Nash equilibrium, Game theory, History

Abstract

The earliest examples of game thinking recorded in the literature can be traced back to the "King Tianji of Qiwei's horse racing" in China more than 2,000 years ago. Besides, the "marriage contract problem" was also crucial in the Babylonian Talmud of 1,500 years ago according to modern economics. The idea of game theory has aroused people's interest and attention. The theory began to have more and more followers. This article presents an extension of existing literature. The paper introduces the basic mainstream form of prisoner's dilemma in fundamental Symmetric forms based on earlier conclusions from other researchers. It examines the problem in the prisoner's dilemma. This work just solves the modal in an ideal condition and the exterior assumption introduces modal and consequence from other scholars.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

O. Raoof and H. Al-Raweshidy, “Theory of games: An introduction,” Game Theory, 2010.

B.J, Ma and W.H, Qiu, On the way out of prisoner's dilemma Productivity research 14-16, 2004.

W.C, Cheng and L.H, Shang, A Prisoner's Dilemma Game Model Based on Reward Factor. Electronic Technology, pp. 5-6, 2016.

Chen Wei-chun, Shang Li-hui. Electronic science and technology, 2016,29 (3): 5-6. (in Chinese)

A Prisoner's dilemma Game Model Based on Multiple Reward Mechanisms

H. Rheingold. 1993. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-60870-7 H. Rheingold. 2000. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier (2nd Edition). C

"Prisoner's Dilemma" Game Analysis of Knowledge Sharing in virtual Communities Static and repeated game based on complete information Li Gang and Lu Yanqiang (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876)

U. Schwalbe and P. Walker, “Zermelo and the early history of game theory,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 123–137, 2001.

A. Cournot, Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses, 1975.

Z. G, Yuan and C. Z, Hong, Game theory. In Intermediate Microeconomics. essay, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press. pp. 261–286, 2020. 0

B. David, “The problem of Waldegrave,” Journal Électronique d’Histoire des Probabilités et de la Statistique, Jan. 2007.

E. Borel, “The theory of play and integral equations with skew symmetric kernels,” Econometrica, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 97, 1953.

Informs, “Tucker, Albert W.,” INFORMS. [Online]. Available: https://www.informs.org/Explore/History-of-O.R.-Excellence/Biographical-Profiles/Tucker-Albert-W. [Accessed: 14-Apr-2022].

T. Cheng. Based on multiple reward mechanisms, Research on the game model of prisoner's dilemma. Lookout Scientist, pp. 54–56, 2022.

D J, Butler. A choice for ‘Me’ or for ‘Us’? Using we-reasoning to predict cooperation and coordination in games. Theory and decision pp. 9-12, 2012.

I. Goodwin, “Book review: H. Rheingold. 1993. the virtual community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-60870-7 H. rheingold. 2000. the virtual community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier (2nd edition). C,” Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 103, 2004.

Prisoner's dilemma. The Decision Lab. (n.d.). Retrieved April 14, 2022, from https://thedecisionlab.com/reference-guide/psychology/prisoners-dilemma