The interpretation and function orientation of the principle of prohibiting abuse of rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v14i.8947Keywords:
Prohibition of abuse of rights, Relativity of rights, Basic principles of civil lawAbstract
Article 132 of Civil Code of the People's Republic of China establishes the principle of prohibiting abuse of rights, which provides the fundamental basis for the identification and judgment of the abuse of the right. The identification of the abuse of rights needs to be made from two aspects: constituent elements and identification elements. There are four kinds of legal consequences of rights abuse at present in our country, namely, loss of rights, limitation of rights, invalidation of behavior and responsibility of civil liability, but it remains to be seen if there are specific rules. As one of the basic principles of civil code, this principle goes hand in hand with the principle of good faith and the principle of public order and good custom. It also has the functional value of filling legal loopholes, reflecting the consistency of the operation of the code, clarifying the boundary of rights and standardizing the exercise of rights.
Downloads
References
Article 132 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.
Wang Liming. "On the Prohibition of Abuse of Rights - Also Commenting on Article 3 of the Interpretation of the General Provisions Chinese Legal Review 2022, No. 3, p. 1-20.
Peng Chengxin. "On the Legal Application of the Principle of Prohibiting Abuse of Rights" Chinese Law Journal 2018, No. 3, p. 249-268.
Wang Yanling. Reflections on Establishing the Principle of Prohibiting the Abuse of Rights in Civil Law Hebei Law Journal 2006, No. 7, p. 53-56.
Wang Liming: On the Prohibition of Abuse of Rights - Also Commenting on Article 3 of the Interpretation of the General Principles Chinese Legal Review 2022, No. 3, p. 1-20.
Mao Shaowei. Commentary on Article 132 (Prohibition of Abuse of Rights) of the Civil Code Chinese Journal of Applied Law 2023, No.1, p.201-212.
Jacques Gasdan, Gilles Gubo, Muhie Fabh Manan General Principles of French Civil Law Law Press, 2004, p. 720.
Louis Joslan, "Relativity of Rights China Legal Publishing House, 2002, p. 222.
Louis Joslan, "Relativity of Rights China Legal Publishing House, 2002, p. 7.
Louis Joslan, "Relativity of Rights China Legal Publishing House, 2002, p. 18.
Louis Joslan, "Relativity of Rights China Legal Publishing House, 2002, p. 18.
Qian Yulin. "Legal Analysis of Prohibiting Abuse of Rights Modern Law 2002, No. 1, p.55-61.
Qian Yulin. "Legal Analysis of Prohibiting Abuse of Rights Modern Law 2002, No. 1, p.55-61.
Peng Chengxin. "On the Legal Application of the Principle of Prohibiting Abuse of Rights" Chinese Law Journal 2018, No. 3, p. 249-268.
Louis Joslan, "Relativity of Rights China Legal Publishing House, 2002, p. 229.
Louis Joslan, "Relativity of Rights China Legal Publishing House, 2002, p. 242.
Louis Joslan, "Relativity of Rights China Legal Publishing House, 2002, p. 250.
Article 48 of the Patent Law.
Article 20 of the Company Law.
Louis Joslan, "Relativity of Rights China Legal Publishing House, 2002, p. 65.
Jacques Gasdan, Gilles Gubo, Muhail Fabh Mannan General Principles of French Civil Law Law Press, 2004, p. 720.
Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the General Provisions of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China (Fa Shi [2022] No. 6), Article 3, Paragraph 3.
Article 7 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.
Wang Yanling. Reflections on Establishing the Principle of Prohibiting the Abuse of Rights in Civil Law Hebei Law Journal 2006, No.7, p. 53-56.
Wang Liming. "On the Boundary between the Principles of Public Order, Good Customs, and Good Faith Jianghan Forum 2019, No. 3, p. 129-136.
Yu Fei. "Differentiation between the Principles of Public Order, Good Customs, and Good Faith" Chinese Social Sciences 2015, No. 11, p. 146-162+208-209.
Li Shuangyuan, Yang Dequn On the Judicial Application of the Principles of Public Order and Good Customs Law and Business Studies Vol. 31 (2014) No. 3, p. 63-71.
Article 8 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.
Luo Shigui. "The Legal Nature of the Principles of Public Order and Good Customs in Chinese Civil Law Journal of Chongqing University (Social Sciences Edition) Vol. 24 (2018) No. 5, p. 139-150.
Yu Fei. "Differentiation between the Principles of Public Order, Good Customs, and Good Faith Chinese Social Sciences 2015, No. 11, p. 146-162+208-209.
Wang Liming. "On the Boundary between the Principles of Public Order, Good Customs, and Good Faith Jianghan Forum 2019, No. 3, p. 129-136.
Article 51 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China.
Yu Fei. "Differentiation between the Principles of Public Order, Good Customs, and Good Faith Chinese Social Sciences 2015, No. 11, p. 146-162+208-209.
Liu Shiguo. "Legal loopholes and their supplementary methods" National People's Congress Legal Review 2010, No.1, p. 209-226.
Fang Xinjun. "Implementation of the Integration of the Internal System and the External System with the Civil Code System - Comments on the Basic Principles of the General Principles of Civil Law Chinese and Foreign Law Vol. 29 (2017) No.3, p. 567-589.
Fang Xinjun. "Implementation of the Integration of Internal System Externality and Civil Code System Abstract of Social Sciences 2017, No.8, p.74-76.
Jacques Gasdan, Gilles Gubo, Muhail Fabh Mannan General Principles of French Civil Law Law Publishing House, 2004, p. 721.
Louis Joslan. "Relativity of Rights China Legal Publishing House, 2002, p. 258.
Louis Joslan. "Relativity of Rights China Legal Publishing House, 2002, p. 258.
Liu Zuoxiang. "The Theory of Relativity of Rights and Its Debates: Based on the" Abuse of Rights "Theory of Joslan in France Tsinghua Law Vol. 7 (2013), No. 6, p.110-121.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






