The Contemporary Value of Hybrid Regime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v15i.9104Keywords:
Hybrid regime; contemporary value; Singapore; Latin America.Abstract
A hybrid regime is a classical system of government in ancient times, and its spirits have been handed down to the present day, resulting in the separation of powers and its widespread use. Today, however, there is very little discussion of the hybrid regime. In some countries where democracy is in transition, or where democracy is in trouble, it is worth considering a hybrid regime. This article analyses the positive impact of hybrid regimes on the socioeconomics of Singapore and Latin America at different points in their history and points out the contemporary value. The value of a hybrid regime lies precisely in its spirit of balance. Whenever a system of government goes to extremes - whether democratic or authoritarian - it gives rise to chaos and social tensions. Reconciliation is therefore necessary. The importance and practical significance of the hybrid system of government as a system of government of reconciliation cannot be overstated.
Downloads
References
Chen Haoyu. Rethinking the rise and fall of the Roman mixed polity - Polybias versus Machiavelli[J]. Journal of Central South University (Social Science Edition), 2022, 28(04): 119-128.
Chu Jianguo. Duet Variations of Reconciliation and Checks and Balances [D]. Wuhan University, 2004.
Han Chao. Bodin's criticism of the doctrine of mixed polity [J]. History of Political Thought, 2014, 5(04): 42-64+198.
Zhou Bin. A brief discussion on Plato's and Aristotle's doctrine of justice and its ethical implications of the hybrid polity [J]. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 205(09): 94-97.
Shen Lin, Yao Renquan. Mixed regime thought and its evolution in modern times [J]. Frontier, 2008, 230(01): 109-111.
Ivan Mati. The concept of mixed government in classical and early modern republicanism. University of Belgrade, UDK 321.728: 321.01.
Ekman J. Political Participation and Regime Stability: A Framework for Analyzing Hybrid Regimes. International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 2009, 30(1), 7–31.
Ye Changmao. Building a modern hybrid polity with organic combination of authority and democracy-Reflection and transcendence of polity choice in post-developed countries under the perspective of risk [J]. Journal of the Party School of the Tianjin Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China, 2018, 20(04): 41-50.
Fong B C H. State-Society Conflicts under Hong Kong’s Hybrid Regime: Governing Coalition Building and Civil Society Challenges. Asian Survey, 2013, 53(5): 854-882.
Morlino Leonardo. Are There Hybrid Regimes. Changes for DemocracyActors, Structures, Processes. Oxford University Press. (2011-11-01): 48–69.
Li Wen. The governing model of the People's Action Party in Singapore and its significance [J]. Contemporary Asia-Pacific, 2005, (05): 3-8.
Carlos Pereira, Marcus André Melo. The Surprising Suc- cess of Multiparty Presidnetialism. Journal of Democracy, 2012, 23(3): 156-170.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
