Construction and Verification of Learning Outcome Evaluation Index System for Students Majoring in Chinese Pharmacy in Higher Vocational Colleges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ajmss.v4i2.12168Keywords:
Higher Vocational Colleges, Chinese Pharmacy Major, Learning Outcomes, Evaluation IndicatorsAbstract
As an important part of traditional Chinese medicine, TCM has experienced rapid development in the past few decades. As the study of TCM continues to deepen, the assessment of student learning outcomes has become increasingly important. However, there is currently a lack of a systematic evaluation index system to evaluate the learning outcomes of Chinese pharmacy students. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap. This study identified relevant evaluation indicators and criteria. Then the opinions and suggestions of the evaluation index system were collected through questionnaire survey. The collected data were verified and analyzed by statistical analysis methods to ensure the validity and reliability of the evaluation index system. The research results show that the evaluation index system constructed can comprehensively evaluate the learning outcomes of students majoring in Chinese pharmacy, and provide an effective reference for schools and industries. The verification results show that the evaluation index system has good stability and reliability in different samples. The evaluation index system for learning outcomes of Chinese pharmacy students in higher vocational colleges constructed in this study has certain theoretical and practical significance. It provides scientific methods and tools for the evaluation of learning outcomes of students majoring in Chinese pharmacy, which is helpful to improve the quality of education and cultivate excellent talents of Chinese pharmacy.
Downloads
References
Syam R Z A, Achmad W. Online learning in higher education: analysis during the pandemic covid-19[J]. Jurnal Mantik, 2022, 5(4): 2256-2261.
Fisher R, Perényi A, Birdthistle N. The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction[J]. Active Learning in Higher Education, 2021, 22(2): 97-113.
Wang H, Cui J. Evaluation of teaching effect in higher educational institutions and identification of its influencing factors[J]. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 2021, 16(17): 226-239.
Ji S, Li J. Evaluation of the motivation status of enterprises and higher vocational schools participating in modern apprenticeship and its key influencing factors based on artificial neural network[J]. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 2021, 16(8): 188-204.
Naim A. Applications of E-learning tools for achieving students learning outcomes[J]. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 2021, 2(2): 75-82.
Kolmos A, Holgaard J E, Clausen N R. Progression of student self-assessed learning outcomes in systemic PBL[J]. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2021, 46(1): 67-89.
Chen Z, Jiao J, Hu K. Formative assessment as an online instruction intervention: Student engagement, outcomes, and perceptions[J]. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 2021, 19(1): 50-65.
Yunusa A A, Umar I N. A scoping review of critical predictive factors (CPFs) of satisfaction and perceived learning outcomes in E-learning environments[J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2021, 26(1): 1223-1270.
Timor A R, AMBIYAR A, DAKHI O, et al. Effectiveness of problem-based model learning on learning outcomes and student learning motivation in basic electronic subjects[J]. International journal of multi science, 2021, 1(10): 1-8.
Rustamova S A, Rashidova M X. Formation of self-assessment competence of primary school students in foreign language teaching[J]. Science and Education, 2022, 3(4): 1075-1080.
Azevedo J P, Hasan A, Goldemberg D, et al. Simulating the potential impacts of COVID-19 school closures on schooling and learning outcomes: A set of global estimates[J]. The World Bank Research Observer, 2021, 36(1): 1-40.
Wuryandani W. The Effect of the Think-Pair-Share Model on Learning Outcomes of Civics in Elementary School Students[J]. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 2021, 16(2): 627-640.
Royani A, Maknun L, Susiawati I, et al. A Comparative Analysis of Learning Outcomes in The Faculty of Education in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore[J]. Jurnal Basicedu, 2022, 6(2): 3138-3146.
Mursid R, Saragih A H, Hartono R. The Effect of the Blended Project-Based Learning Model and Creative Thinking Ability on Engineering Students' Learning Outcomes[J]. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2022, 10(1): 218-235.
Bacca‐Acosta J, Avila‐Garzon C. Student engagement with mobile‐based assessment systems: A survival analysis[J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2021, 37(1): 158-171.
Marantika J E R. Metacognitive ability and autonomous learning strategy in improving learning outcomes[J]. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 2021, 15(1): 88-96.
Lukitasari M, Murtafiah W, Ramdiah S, et al. Constructing Digital Literacy Instrument and Its Effect on College Students' Learning Outcomes[J]. International Journal of Instruction, 2022, 15(2): 171-188.
Supena I, Darmuki A, Hariyadi A. The Influence of 4C (Constructive, Critical, Creativity, Collaborative) Learning Model on Students' Learning Outcomes[J]. International Journal of Instruction, 2021, 14(3): 873-892.
Munna A S, Kalam M A. Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: a literature review[J]. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 2021, 4(1): 1-4.
Shute V, Rahimi S, Smith G, et al. Maximizing learning without sacrificing the fun: Stealth assessment, adaptivity and learning supports in educational games[J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2021, 37(1): 127-141.
