Mechanism of Balancing Diplomacy among Middle Powers the Hedging Strategy of Indonesia under the Competition of “Free-Open Indo Pacific” and “Belt and Road Initiative”

Authors

  • Yue Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ajmss.v5i1.14077

Keywords:

Balancing Diplomacy, Middle Powers, Hedging Strategy, Indonesia, Free-Open Indo Pacific, Belt and Road Initiative, Global Maritime Fulcrum Strategy

Abstract

The competition between China and the United States is worsening in the Indo-Pacific region. With the evolution of the Indo-Pacific regional order, Southeast Asian countries find themselves at the forefront of competition. Most Southeast Asian countries face three main choices. The first choice is to support the current superpower, the United States; The second option is to cooperate with China and join the BRI initiative; The third option is a strategic hedge between China and the United States. This study focuses on the Southeast Asian region, taking Indonesia as the research object, and analyzes how Indonesia, as a middle power, adopts a hedging strategy to carry out excellent power balance diplomacy. Indonesia has adopted the “Global Maritime Fulcrum Strategy (GMF)” as the primary measure to deal with BRI and FOIP. In this paper, a literature review and case study are used to study. The first part mainly expounds on balanced diplomacy between a middle power and an major power, and the second part focuses on Indonesia as the research object. Through a case study, it analyzes the background, current policies, achievements, and significance of GMF strategy and explains the hedging strategy of Indonesia, a middle power, to balance China and the United States.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Karim, F. M. (2018) Middle power, status-seeking and role conceptions: the cases of Indonesia and South Korea. Australian Journal of International Affairs., 72(4): 1.

Muhibat, F. (2017) Indonesia’s New Ocean Policy: Analysing the External Dimension. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India., p. 5.

Laksmana, E. (2011) The enduring strategic trinity: explaining Indonesia’s geopolitical architecture. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region., 7(1): 96.

Wang, L., Zhang, W. (2021) International Reputation, National Strength and the Choice of Southeast Asia. International Political Science., pp. 56-92.

Mark, B., Will, L. (2015) The Middle Power Moment: A New Basis for Cooperation between Indonesia and Australia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 236.

Pratiwi, F.I., Puspitasari, I., Hikmawati, I., Bagus, H. (2021). Indonesia’s Middle Power Strategy Between “Belt And Road Initiatives” (BRI) and “Free-Open Indo Pacific” (FOIP). CEJISS., 15(3): 30-54.

Muhammad, F. (2021) Asia and Competing Visions of Regional Order: Free and Open Indo-Pacific and Belt and Road Initiative. Strategic Studies., 40(4): 1–20.

Wibisono, G., Kustiningsih, N., Susanti, L.R. (2023) Meta Synthesis of Strategic Development Management Between Indonesia and Australia Based on Constant Market Share Perspective. Media Mahardhika., 21(3): 434-447.

Eduard, A., Lalisang, Y., Candra, D.S. (2021) Indonesia’s Global Maritime Fulcrum & China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Match Made at Sea? Friedrich Ebert Stifung., pp.1-26.

Lovinal, H.R., Gong, J., Chen, H. (2017) Review of “The Chinese Belt and Road Initiative”: Indonesia-China Cooperation and Future Opportunities for Indonesia’s Port Cities Development. Journal of Regional and City Planning., 28(3): 161-177.

He, B. (2018) Chinese Expanded Perceptions of the Region and Its Changing Attitudes Toward the Indo-Pacific: a Hybrid Vision of the Institutionalization of the Indo-Pacific. East Asia., 35: 117–132.

Yeremia, A.D. (2021) Explaining Indonesia’s Constrained Engagement with the Belt and Road Initiative: Balancing Developmentalism against Nationalism and Islamism. Asian Perspective., 45(2): 325-347.

D.F., Anwar. (2020) Indonesia and the ASEAN outlook on the Indo-Pacific. International Affairs., 96: 111–30.

Fangfei, J. (2023) An Analysis of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF): Essence, Impacts and Prospects. East Asian Affairs., 2(2): 1-20.

Kai, H., Mingjiang, L. (2020) Understanding the dynamics of the Indo-Pacific: US–China strategic competition, regional actors, and beyond. International Affairs., pp.1-7.

Mingjiang, L. (2020) The Belt and Road Initiative: geo-economics and Indo-Pacific security competition, International Affairs., pp. 169–88.

Raditya, M. (2017) The Roots and Evolution of Indonesia’s Middle Power Activism. The Indonesian Quarterly., 45: 152

Yoshimatsu, H. (2022) Indonesia's response to the belt and road initiative and the Indo‐Pacific: A pivotal state's hedging strategy. Asian Politics & Policy., 14(2): 159-174.

Tomotaka, S. (2019) “Belt and Road” vs. “Free and Open Indo-Pacific”: Competition Over Regional Order and ASEAN Belt and Road Initiative and ASEAN. National Institute for Defense Studies Commentary.

Downloads

Published

05-11-2023

Issue

Section

Articles