What will China do under the New Background of WTO Dispute Mechanism?

Authors

  • Zhouhongtai Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ajmss.v5i1.14078

Keywords:

World Trade Organization, Dispute Settlement Mechanism, Appellate Body, China Problem, Dispute Reform

Abstract

In the process of establishing a multilateral rule system, WTO (World Trade Organization) has always been an irreplaceable role, which can promote global economic development and provide a platform for resolving disputes. Nowadays, global economic and trade governance is multi-polar, and traditional governance rules are not enough to maintain the world economic order. There is an international recognition that the WTO is anachronistic and in need of reform. China, one of the world 's largest trading countries, for the sake of acclimatizing itself to the new changes in the global economic environment and respond to challenges as soon as possible, China must firmly safeguard the authority and effectiveness of the multilateral trading regime with the WTO as the core, and propel the recovery of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism actively. This paper mainly studies that the current WTO dispute settlement mechanism cannot play an effective role and therefore needs to be reformed. It also analyzes the crises and challenges that China faces in the new era, and gives suggestions for the crises and challenges. Finally, it calls for the current approach to dispute resolution to be through cooperation rather than conflict.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Caporal, J., & Gerstel, D. (2018). WTO Reform: The Beginning of the End or the End of the Beginning. Center for Strategic & International Studies, October, 23.

Smith, J. (2004). Inequality in international trade? Developing countries and institutional change in WTO dispute settlement. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3): 561.

Condon, B. J. (2018). Captain America and the Tarnishing of the Crown: The Feud between the WTO Appellate Body and the USA. Journal of World Trade, 52(4): 556.

Hoekman, B., & Mavroidis, P. C. (2021). WTO Reform: Back to the Past to Build for the Future. Global Policy, 12: 10.

Bown, C. P., & Hillman, J. A. (2019). WTO'ing a Resolution to the China Subsidy Problem. Journal of International Economic Law, 22(4): 565.

Zhou, W., Gao, H., & Bai, X. (2019). Building a market economy through WTO-inspired reform of state-owned enterprises in China. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 68(4): 992.

Zhou, W., Gao, H., & Bai, X. (2019). Building a market economy through WTO-inspired reform of state-owned enterprises in China. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 68(4): 986-987.

Adekola, T. A. (2019). US–China trade war and the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 18(3): 130.

Du, M. (2022). Explaining China 's approach to investor‐state dispute settlement reform: A contextual perspective. European Law Journal, 28(4-6): 284.

Anonymous. (2000). ' A Good Deal ' - Clinton talks about giving China permanent trade status. Cross-Strait relations, 03:31.

Liu Xiaoning (2023). China 's exploration of docking high-standard international economic and trade rules. Chinese Journal of Social Sciences, 2023.

Mavroidis, P. C., & Sapir, A. (2021). All the tea in China: Solving the ' China problem ' at the WTO. Global Policy, 12, 44-46.

Downloads

Published

05-11-2023

Issue

Section

Articles