Religious Climate and Corporate ESG Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/0bg7de86Keywords:
Religious Climate, ESG, Transmission Path, Informal SystemAbstract
Religion, as an important part of China's history and culture, plays an important role in economic and social life. In the context of China's reality, which emphasizes high-quality development, this study aims to explore the impact of the informal institution of religious atmosphere on the environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance of firms. Through empirical research, this paper finds that: the stronger the religious atmosphere of a firm's location, the better its ESG performance; further, this paper examines the path of the influence of religious atmosphere on firms' ESG performance. The results show that religious atmosphere promotes the ESG performance of firms through two paths: suppressing managers' self-interested and short-sighted behaviors and creating an ethical environment. Meanwhile, the weaker the degree of marketization (formal system) in the region, the more obvious the role of religion (informal system) in promoting firms' ESG performance, which suggests that there is a certain substitution relationship between religious traditions and formal system. In addition, family business can further enhance the role of religion in promoting firms' ESG performance. Finally, this paper segments different religions and finds that Taoism's emphasis on man and nature makes it better than Buddhism in promoting ESG performance, especially in environmental performance. This study not only provides empirical evidence for the use of ESG at the micro level, but also provides empirical evidence for the high-quality development of firms in the context of Eastern religions in China.
Downloads
References
Crifo P., Forget V. D., Teyssier S., The Price of Environmental, Social and Governance Practice Disclosure: An Experiment with Professional Private Equity Investors. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol.30, February 2015, pp.168-194.
Li Y., M. Gong, X. Y. Zhang, et al., The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure on Firm Value: The Role of CEO Power. British Accounting Review, Vol.50, No.1, January 2018, pp.60-75.
Eliwa Y., Aboud A., Saleh A., ESG Practices and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from EU Countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol.79, September 2021, pp.1-20.
Christensen D. M., Serafeim G., Sikochi A., Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of the Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings. Accounting Review, Vol.97, No.1, January 2022, pp.147-175.
Baldini M., Maso L. D., Liberatore G., et al., Role of Country-and Firm-Level Determinants in Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.1, June 2018, pp.79-98.
Helmke G., S. Levitsky., Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, Vol.2, No.4, December 2004, pp.725-740.
McGuire S., T. Omer, N. Sharp., The Impact of Religion on Financial Reporting Irregularities. The Accounting Review, Vol.87, No.2, March 2012, pp.645-673.
Du X., Does Religion Matter to Owner-Manager Agency Costs? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.118, December 2013, pp.319-347.
Du X., Does Religion Mitigate Tunneling? Evidence from Chinese Buddhism. Journal of Business Ethic, Vol.125, December 2014, pp.299-327.
Chintrakarn P., P. Jiraporn, Y. S. Kim, et al., The Causal Effect of Religious Piety on Shareholder Wealth: Evidence from Acquirer Returns and Historical Religious Identification. Applied Economics Letters, Vol.23, No.15, Jan 2016, pp.1110-1116.
Zolotoy L., D. O' Sullivan, G. P. Martin., The Social Context of Compensation Design: Social Norms and the Impact of Equity Incentives. Human Resource Management, Vol.5, March 2018, pp.1233-1250.
Shen N., Su J., Religion and succession intention-Evidence from Chinese family firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol.45, August 2017, pp.150-161.
Du X., Du Y., Zeng Q., et al., Religious atmosphere, law enforcement, and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol.33, March 2016, pp.229-265.
Harjoto M. A., F. Rossi. Religiosity, Female Directors, and Corporate Social Responsibility for Italian Listed Companies. Journal of Business Research, Vol.95, February 2019, pp.338-346
Chatjuthamard-Kitsabunnarat J., Tong., Does religious piety inspire corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Evidence from historical religious identification. Applied Economics Letters, Vol.21, No.16, April 2014, pp.1128-1133.
Du X., Jian W., Zeng Q., et al., Corporate Environmental Responsibility in Polluting Industries: Does Religion Matter?. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.124, October 2014, pp.485-507.
Brammer S., Williams G., Zinkin J., Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross‐country sample. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.71, March 2007, pp.229-243.
Vitell S. J., The Role of Religiosity in Business and Consumer Ethic: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.2, November 2009, pp.155-167.
Dehejia R., T. DeLeire, E. F. Luttmer., Insuring Consumption and Happiness through Religious Organizations. Journal of Public Economics, Vol.91, No1-2, February 2007, pp.259-279.
Hilary G., K. W. Hui., Does Religion Matter in Corporate Decision Making in America?. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.93, No.3, September 2009, pp.455-473.
Weaver G. R., B. R., Agle, Religiosity and Ethical Behavior in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective. Academy of Management Review, Vol.1, January 2002, pp.77-97.
Dyreng S.D., W.J. Mayew, C.D. Williams, Religious Social Norms and Corporate Financial Reporting. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol.7-8, August 2012, pp.845-875.
Miller A. S., J. P. Hoffmann., Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender Differences in Religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol.34, No.1, March 1995, pp.63-75.
Berrone P., C. Cruz, L R. Gόmez-Mejía., Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms: The critical Dimensions, Assessment Approaches, and Agenda for Future Research. Family Business Review, Vol.25, No.3, September 2012, pp.258-279.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

