Study on the Identification of Unfair Competition in the Acquisition of Business Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/pyn7v008Keywords:
Business Data, Business to Unfair Competition, Mode of IdentificationAbstract
In the era of the digital economy, competition among operators has expanded to include competition for business data, and Unfair competition cases have sprung up around the acquisition of business data by major internet operators. In current judicial practice, referees often cite existing provisions such as the “General provisions” and “Internet specific provisions” of the anti-unfair competition law to determine the illegality and legitimacy of commercial data Unfair competition. And in the determination of such acts, there are some problems, such as the conflict between “Rights and interests protection” and “Behavior legitimacy”, the definition of data rights and interests tends to protect the interests of operators, and the judgment of legality boundary of data acquisition behavior is fuzzy. Therefore, it is suggested to correct the way of identifying the commercial data acquisition behavior, return to the nature of competition, and establish the behavior regulation paradigm. Changing the division of data ownership, confirming the portability of personal data, expanding the reasonable limit of data portability while playing the function of public-private synergy. To refine the judgment standard of justifiability of behavior, it is necessary to establish the behavior paradigm of “Reasonable legal interest test”, and to explore the rules of fact identification and cognizance of Data Acquisition Technology, in order to achieve the existing rules under the commercial data acquisition pattern of behavior identification optimization.
Downloads
References
Shi Xinyuan. Methodological Review of Unfair competition adjustments to business data [J]. Journal of Nankai (philosophy and social sciences edition) , 2024, (01) .
Liu Wei. On the Normative Composition of Unfair Competition Cases in Data Acquisition [J]. Contemporary Law, 2024, (02).
Huang Mingjian, Sun Chen Haojie. Legal Analysis of the Legitimacy Boundary of Data Grasping Behavior: Taking the Models of China, the United States, and the European Union as Examples [J]. Finance and Economics, 2024, (03).
Li Yang, Su Yi. Reflection and Solution of Business Data Protection Models [J]. Guangdong Social Sciences, 2023 ,(04).
Yu Fei. Methods for distinguishing rights and interests in tort law [J]. Legal Research, 2011, (4).
Huang Mingjian, Sun Chen Haojie. Legal Analysis of the Legitimacy Boundary of Data Grasping Behavior: Taking the Models of China, the United States, and the European Union as Examples [J]. Finance and Economics, 2024, (03).
Wu Taixuan, Qiao Zixuan. Difficulties in Identifying Unfair Competition in Business Data and Optimization Plans: Based on Empirical Analysis of 95 Judicial Cases [J]. Electronic Intellectual Property, 2024, (01).
Zhang Yifei. Application Logic and Rules of Data Portability Right [J]. Era Law, 2024, (01) .
Zhao Dan, Shen Cheng. Investigation and Reflection on Judicial Review Elements of Unfair Competition Disputes in Data Grasping [J]. Science and Law (Chinese and English), 2023, (02).
Cheng Ziwei. Construction of the Identification Model of Internet Improper Obstruction of Competition Behavior [J]. Politics and Law, 2023, (07).
Zhao Lili, Sun Hongjiao. Research on the Legitimacy and Judgment of Restricting Data Grasping Behavior - Based on Two Judgment Standards of "Rights Infringement" and "Behavior Legitimacy" [J]. Electronic Intellectual Property, 2023, (03).
Yang Dong, Li Zishuo. On the Reconstruction of Anti Unfair Competition Law: With the Data Element Regulation System as the Core [J]. Legal Application, 2022, (11).
Sun Jin, Feng Tao. Judicial Review of Unfair Competition Disputes Related to Data Grasping in the Digital Era [J]. Legal Application, 2022, (06).
Jiancheng Gao. Legitimacy and Value Measurement of Restricting Data Grasping Behavior [J]. China Circulation Economy, 2022, (08).
Liu Xiaokui. Network Crawler Technology and Strategy Analysis [J]. Network Security Technology and Application, 2022, (05).
Liu Xiaokui. Network Crawler Technology and Strategy Analysis [J]. Network Security Technology and Application, 2022, (05).
Zhong Chun, Wang Zhengyu. Judicial Practice and Reflection on Disputes over Unfair Competition in Data [J]. Journal of Beihang University (Social Sciences Edition), 2022, (01).
Cai Bingkun, Jing Jing. Legal application dilemma and improvement of enterprise data crawling behavior [J]. Journal of Chongqing Open University, 2022, (05).
Lu Daifu, Zhang Yuqi. From Rights Protection to Interest Measurement: Path Optimization for Legitimacy Recognition of Data Grasping Behavior [J]. Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law, 2022, (06).
Hong Yingying. European Union's Digital Market Law and Its Inspiration for China [J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science and Law (Legal Theory Series), 2023, (02).
Zhang Zhanjiang. On the Boundary of Recognition of Unfair Competition [J]. Political and Legal Review, 2021, (02).
Kong Xiangjun. On the Dual Legal Interest Protection Genealogy of Anti Unfair Competition Law: Observations Based on New Business Forms, New Models, and New Achievements [J]. Political and Legal Review Series, 2021, (02).
Chen Genghua. Theoretical Reflection and Institutional Adjustment of China's Competition Law Competition Concept: Taking the Case of Blocking Video Advertising as an Example [J]. Modern Law, 2020, (06).
Zhang Zhanjiang. The Transformation of the Paradigm for Identifying Unfair Competition Behavior: From "Protecting Competitors" to "Protecting Competition" Chinese and Foreign Law, 2019, (01).
Hou Yuewei. Reshaping the Criminal Law Regulation Concept and Path Development of Data Crawling Behavior from a Shared Perspective [J/OL]. Jiangsu Social Sciences.
Jiang Ge. Business Practice Factors in the Evaluation of Legitimacy of Competitive Behavior [J]. Legal Review, 2019, (02).
Liu Wei. On the Concept and Paradigm Change of "Business Ethics" Judgment -- Observation Based on Internet Benchmarking Cases [J] Technology and Law, 2018, (02).
Kong Xiangjun. On the Basic Paradigm of Anti Unfair Competition [J]. Jurist, 2018, (01).
Chen Bing. The Competition Law Attribute and Regulatory Significance of Big Data [J]. Law, 2018, (08).
Jacquellena Carrero,Access Granted:A First Amendment Theory of Reform of the CFAA Access Provision,2020.
Buyuksagis Erdem, Towards a Transatlantic Concept of Data Privacy [J]. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.