Research on the Construction of Evaluation System for the Main Position of Enterprise led Industry University Research Collaborative Innovation

Bangsi Du

doi:10.54097/4nqkha29

Authors

Bangsi Du

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/4nqkha29

Keywords:

Collaborative Innovation, Evaluation System, Industry Academia Research, Subject Status

Abstract

The study of the evaluation system for the dominant position of enterprises in collaborative innovation between industry, academia, and research is of great significance for guiding policies, promoting cooperation, and improving innovation efficiency. This article reviews previous research, based on the life cycle theory and the process perspective of enterprise participation in industry university research collaborative innovation, and proposes the main body status and evaluation system of enterprise led industry university research collaborative innovation, including four primary indicators of research and development investment, activity participation, scientific and technological achievements, and achievement benefits, and 18 secondary indicators. At the same time, principal component analysis and factor analysis were used to quantitatively analyze relevant indicators and variables, and the rationality of the enterprise led evaluation system for collaborative innovation between industry, academia, and research was sorted out. The research findings contribute to a better understanding of the impact of enterprise led collaborative innovation between industry, academia, and research on economic and social development, and provide guidance for future research and practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Jiang Wenning, Luo Jin, Guan Hannan. Regional University Resource Endowment, Industry University Research Cooperation Intensity, and Enterprise Innovation Performance [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 28 (01): 75-86. DOI: 10.13806/j.cnki. issn1008-7095.2020.01.011.

[2] Wang Shirui. Research on Accounting of University Patent Assets Based on Different Usage Purposes [J]. Finance and Accounting Communication, 2024, (03): 153-157. DOI: 10.16144/j.cnki. issn1002-8072.2024.03.023.

[3] Xu Xiaodan, Liu Chelin. Why should large enterprises attach importance to basic research? [J] Science and Technology Management, 2020, 41 (09): 3-19.

[4] Yuan Changhong, Zhang Shuman. Collaborative Innovation of Industry University Research with Enterprises as the Main Body: Construction of Management Framework [J]. Research Management, 2019, 40 (10): 184-192. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki. 1000-2995.2019.10.017.

[5] Taş Eylem.Data literacy education through university-industry collaboration[J].Information and Learning Sciences, 2024, 125(5-6) :389-405.

[6] Shi Weiping, Fan Qiyin, Huang Songjie. Mechanism, Evaluation, and Inspiration of Coupling and Coordination between Higher Vocational Education and Regional Economy in China [J]. Modern Education Management, 2024, (04): 106-118.

[7] Cheng Hua, Wen Yi, Xu Yaoyi. Research on the Evolution of Zhejiang Province Enterprises' Integration into the Yangtze River Delta Industry University Research Cooperation Network: Based on the Perspective of Joint Patent Application [J]. Science and Management, 2022, 42 (04): 16-24+95.

[8] Zhang Yajun. Measurement and dynamic evolution analysis of the coordinated development of high-tech manufacturing industry chain and innovation chain [J]. Management Modernization, 2024, 44 (03): 128-138. DOI: 10.19634/j.cnki. 11- 1403/c.2024.03.013.

[9] Zhang Liqun, Weng Qingguang. Research on the Collaborative Innovation Mechanism of Industry University Research Integration of Government, School and Enterprise: Based on the Analysis of the Survey Status in Fuzhou City in Recent Years [J]. China University Science and Technology, 2020, (09): 67-70. DOI: 10.16209/j.cnki.cust.2020.01.014.

[10] Tao Ruyu, Zhao Zhe, Liu Yanbo. Evaluation and Reflection on the Public Policy Effect of Collaborative Innovation between Industry, academia, and research in Liaoning Province's High end Equipment Manufacturing Industry from the Perspective of Policy Tools [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2023, 43 (14): 58-68.

[11] Zhu Wei. Analyzing the influencing factors of collaborative innovation and industrial structure upgrading on the economy: reflection on the economic dilemma of enterprises.[J]. Environmental science and pollution research international, 2023, 30(45):101790-101803.

[12] Ge Tao'an. Evaluation and Evolution of Urban Comprehensive Strength Based on Principal Component Analysis: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province [J]. Modern Urban Research, 2023, (09): 88-95.

[13] Ouyang Jinying et al. Comparing Methods for Factor Score Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling: The Role of Network Analysis[J].Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024,31(3):385-403.

[14] Xue Ya, Wang Xueying. Research on the influencing factors of regional selection for the transformation of major scientific and technological achievements based on factor analysis [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2023, 43 (12): 194-201.

[15] Chen Zitao, Yuan Meng, Meng Fanrong. Government funding, scientific and technological social organizations, and collaborative innovation among industry, academia, and research [J]. Scientific Research, 2023, 41 (10): 1822-1832. DOI: 10.16192/j.cnki. 1003-2053.221102.001.

[16] Dong Jinjin, Liu Jiashu. Research on Policy Evolution, Overall Layout, and Implementation Path of Building Industry University Research Collaborative Innovation Mechanism: A Case Study of Anhui Province [J]. Scientific Management Research, 2024, 42 (02): 83-91. DOI: 10.19445/j.cnki.15-1103/ 3. 2024.02.011.

[17] Chen Wei, Wang Xiufeng, Qu Hui, et al. Study on the influencing factors of collaborative innovation and sharing behavior among industry, academia and research [J]. Management Review, 2020, 32 (11): 92-101. DOI: 10.14120/j. cnki. cn11-5057/f.2020.11.007.