Exploration of the Enforcement Dilemmas of China's Antitrust Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/xj1q7q94Keywords:
China's Antitrust Law, Enforcement Dilemmas, Legal Framework, Internet Platform EconomyAbstract
Since its implementation in 2008, China's Antitrust Law has provided legal protection for market competition, but it faces numerous dilemmas in practice. With the rise of emerging industries such as the internet platform economy, big data, and artificial intelligence, the traditional antitrust law framework has increasingly revealed its inadequacies, particularly in regulating new types of monopolistic behaviors, such as data monopolies and platform monopolies. This article reviews the development of China's Antitrust Law and analyzes the enforcement dilemmas it faces, including structural flaws in the administrative system, political priorities, and delays in legal enforcement. Furthermore, the article proposes reform directions to address these dilemmas, including improving the legal framework, enhancing enforcement efficiency, strengthening interdepartmental collaboration, and increasing public participation. The goal is to improve the effectiveness of antitrust law enforcement and promote the healthy development of China's market.
Downloads
References
[1] Zheng W .Transplanting Antitrust in China: Economic Transition, Market Structure, and State Control[J].University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 2010, 32(2):643-721.
[2] Sun S, Zhang C. The Draft Fining Guidelines and the future of antitrust fines in China[J]. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 2021, 9(2): 373-387.
[3] Zhu J, Gu J. Intensified law enforcement and firm innovation: Evidence from China's antitrust consolidation[J]. China Economic Review, 2024, 87: 102265.
[4] Fu X, Tan G. Abuse of market dominance under China’s anti-monopoly law: the case of tetra pak[J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 2019, 54: 409-434.
[5] Wei D. Antitrust in China: An overview of recent implementation of anti-monopoly law[J]. European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR), 2013, 14(1): 119-139.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

