The Interaction between Douyin Opinion Leaders and Douyin Algorithms and Recommendation Mechanisms: The Spread of False Information
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/yvyxeb90Keywords:
Opinion Leaders, Douyin Platform, Spread of False InformationAbstract
This paper explores the interaction between opinion leaders and algorithmic mechanisms on the Douyin platform, especially the process of false information dissemination. By analyzing the behavior of opinion leaders, this paper distinguishes between intentional and unintentional ways of false information dissemination. As opinion leaders on the platform, opinion leaders can influence the ideas and behaviors of a large number of users through posting, sharing or commenting, thereby accelerating the spread of false information. Douyin's recommendation algorithm and "recommend to friends" function, as the core mechanism of the platform, use user data to personalize content recommendations, further promoting the widespread dissemination of false information. This paper reveals the two-way interaction between opinion leaders and algorithms: on the one hand, the influence of opinion leaders strengthens the effect of algorithmic recommendations, and on the other hand, the algorithmic mechanism provides opinion leaders with a larger dissemination platform, prompting false information to spread rapidly in social networks. Through an in-depth analysis of these factors, this paper aims to provide a systematic understanding of the mechanism of false information dissemination on the Douyin platform and propose corresponding policy recommendations for the platform to govern false information.
Downloads
References
[1] Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1968). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press.
[2] Bao, X. (2012). Analysis of the subjectivity and interactivity of online opinion leaders. Journalism and Communication, 7: 81–82.
[3] Pierri, F., & Ceri, S. (2019). False news on social media: a data-driven survey. ACM Sigmod Record, 48(2): 18-27.
[4] Muhammed T, S., & Mathew, S. K. (2022). The disaster of misinformation: a review of research in social media. International journal of data science and analytics, 13 (4): 271-285.
[5] Zeng, X., & Wang, Z. (2019). The diffusion mechanism of false information and network governance in health communication. Modern Communication: Journal of Communication University of China, 6: 34–40.
[6] Liu, G. (2014). Analysis of the role and guidance strategy of Weibo opinion leaders. Journal of Wuhan University (Humanities Edition), 67(2):115–118.
[7] Chen, X. K., Diong, S. M., Leong, B., Tan, R. H., Ng, S. S. Y., & Chan, S. (2024). The nexus of scam and fake news: An exploratory study of cases of fake news-scams in Singapore. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17488958241282 375.
[8] Chakrabarti, S., Rooney, C., & Kweon, M. (2018). Verification, duty, credibility: Fake news and ordinary citizens in Kenya and Nigeria. London: BBC News. Retrieved May, 12, 2020.
[9] Guo, M., & Wang, L. (2021). Suppression and hijacking: The 'algorithm anxiety' of Douyin users. Journalism and Writing.
[10] Zimmer, F., Scheibe, K., Stock, M., & Stock, W. G. (2019). Fake news in social media: Bad algorithms or biased users?. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 7(2): 40-53.
[11] Ozturk, P., Li, H., & Sakamoto, Y. (2015, January). Combating rumor spread on social media: The effectiveness of refutation and warning. In 2015 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 2406-2414). IEEE.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

