Evaluation Study on Scientific and Technological Achievements of Enterprise Based on PDCA Cycle: Taking Tobacco Enterprises in Shaanxi Province as an Example

Yunpeng Mei; Chengcheng Li; Fei Han; Chao Chen

doi:10.54097/stmp8408

Authors

Yunpeng Mei
Chengcheng Li
Fei Han
Chao Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/stmp8408

Keywords:

Scientific and Technological Achievement, PDCA Cycle, Evaluation Indicator, Tobacco Enterprise, Entropy Method

Abstract

The scientific and technological evaluation plays an important role in the transformation, application and promotion of scientific and technological achievements. The establishment of the evaluation indicator system on scientific and technological achievements can accelerate the cultivation of new quality productivity of enterprises. The PDCA cycle was introduced into the process of evaluating the scientific and technological achievements of enterprise, which was specifically divided into four stages: the evaluation objectives and plan formulation stage (P), the evaluation indicators design stage (D), the scientific and technological achievements evaluation stage (C), and the evaluation effect improvement stage (A). The evaluation indicator system of scientific and technological achievements was designed from the dimensions of quality, performance and contribution. The results of reliability and validity test and entropy method analysis showed that the constructed evaluation indicator system was reliable and effective. Taking the scientific and technological projects of technological development type of tobacco enterprises as examples, the evaluation system on scientific and technological achievements was verified in order to provide new ideas and methods for the evaluation process management of scientific and technological achievements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] H. Gao: The time and space transformation of knowledge production and the paradigm transformation of evaluation model of scientific and technological achievements, Science & Technology Progress and Policy, Vol. 39 (2022) No. 2, p. 121-127.

[2] H.H. Lai, J.J. Guo, L.L. You, et al. Research on evaluation index system of scientific and technological achievements in traditional Chinese medicine clinical research, Chinese General Practice, vol. 27 (2024) No. 4, p. 3403-3410.

[3] Z.Z. Wang, X.Z. Zheng, C.F. Yu, et al. Evaluation of whole process management of tobacco R&D projects, Acta Tabacaria Sinica, Vol. 21 (2015) No.1, p. 107-111.

[4] X.A. Yang, Y. Xing and Y. Chen: Development practice and countermeasures of third-party evaluation of scientific and technological achievements in China, Science and Technology Management Research, Vol. 43 (2023) No. 4, p. 55-61.

[5] Z.J. Wang, M.P. Zhang, L.X. Tao, et al. Research on performance evaluation index system of scientific research projects in tobacco industry in Hubei Province based on analytic hierarchy process entropy weight method, Science Technology and Industry, Vol. 22 (2022) No. 6, p. 163-169.

[6] L.B. Li: Discussion on the improvement of the evaluation mechanism of scientific and technological achievements in colleges and universities, China University Science & Technology, (2021) No. S1, p. 24-27.

[7] Z.Y. Chen, J. Luo: Application of PDCA model in the whole-process quality management of science and technology programs: Taking key-area R&D program management in Guangdong Province as an example, Science and Technology Management Research, Vol. 42 (2022) No. 22, p. 169-176.

[8] M. Cao: Management mode of scientific research projects based on PDCA, 2016 International Conference on Management Science and Management Innovation (Guilin, China, August 13-14, 2016). p. 128-130.

[9] Y. Zhang, Y.P. Liu, L.H. Chen, et al. Application and prospect of PDCA in evaluation of medical research achievements, Modern Hospital Management, Vol. 17 (2019) No. 4, p. 59-62.

[10] R. Sha, G. Wu: Application of PDCA cycle in quality improvement of science and technology projects, Science and Technology Management Research, Vol. 41 (2021) No. 6, p. 161-165.

[11] Information on http://www.hubei. gov.cn/zfwj/ ezbf/ 202112/ t20211221_3925755.shtm.

[12] B.K. Dong, Y. Yuan, X.K. Guo, et al. Quantitative study on market state evaluation system of new domestic cigarettes, Acta Tabacaria Sinica, Vol. 29 (2023) No. 2, p. 105-110.

[13] Q.H. Cai, R. Tao, Y.S. Zhang, et al. Construction of the theoretical foundation of value evaluation of public science and technology achievements, Science and Technology Management Research, Vol. 43 (2023) No. 3, p. 53-59.

[14] X.Z. Gao, C.C. Liu: Research on the performance evaluation indicator system of scientific and technological achievements transformation project based on government perspective, Science & Technology Progress and Policy, Vol. 31 (2014) No. 12, p. 129-134.

[15] X. Wang, H. Shu, A.h. Hu, et al. Research on the construction of scientific and technological achievements management index system, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 221 (2023), p. 81-85.

[16] F. Sun: Establishment of evaluation index system of applied scientific and technological achievements, China University Science & Technology, (2017) No. 4, p. 71-72.

[17] Y.F. Zou, Z.W. Xiao: Research on the formation mechanism of the pro-environmental behavior of enterprises in ecological advantage area, Journal of Statistics and Information, Vol. 37 (2022) No. 11, p. 117-128.

[18] T.S. Ruan, X.H. Li, Y. Gu: Value co-creation perception experience, digital platform interaction scene and disruptive innovation, Journal of Statistics and Information, Vol. 39 (2024) No. 5, p. 115-128.

[19] J. Zhou: Questionnaire Data Analysis: Cracking Six Types of Analysis Ideas of SPSS (2nd Edition) (Publishing House of Electronics Industry, China 2020), p. 50.

[20] H.F. Zhu, P.F. Shi, X.Y. Yu: Spatial adaptation analysis of digital village and high-quality development of rural tourism in Guizhou, Geography and Geo-Information Science, Vol. 40 (2024) No. 3, p. 143-150.