AI-Assisted Practice of Visual Design for Traditional Cultural Symbols

Authors

  • Xiaoyi Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ggk2se09

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Traditional Cultural Symbols, Visual Design, Cultural Communication, Technological Applications

Abstract

In the current era where globalization and digitalization are deeply intertwined, cultural diversity is becoming increasingly prominent. As vital carriers of national cultural genes, traditional cultural symbols face the pressing challenge of adapting to modern communication contexts in their inheritance and innovation. The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) offers groundbreaking solutions to this dilemma. With its strengths in data processing and pattern generation, AI is profoundly reshaping the creative logic and practical pathways of visual design for traditional cultural symbols. Based on this context, this paper systematically explores the significance of AI-assisted visual design of traditional cultural symbols, analyzes specific applications of image recognition, algorithmic generation, and big data analysis in design practices, and examines core challenges such as misinterpretation of cultural connotations and high technological costs. It further proposes targeted solutions, including enhancing AI’s capacity for cultural learning, optimizing technologies to reduce costs, and promoting designer training and mindset transformation, to facilitate the broader dissemination and deeper innovation of traditional cultural symbols in contemporary society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Pedersen, I. (2023). The rise of generative AI and enculturating AI writing in postsecondary education. Digital Life Institute.

[2] Li, J., Zhang, C., Zhu, W., & Ren, Y. (2025). A comprehensive review of deep learning models for image generation in creative industries. Journal of Computer Applications, 45(1), 23–35.

[3] Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in business intelligence, finance, and e-commerce: A review. SSRN.

[4] Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7893–7925.

[5] Leong, W. Y. (2025c). AI-powered color restoration of faded historical paintings. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology and the 8th ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering.

[6] Matsiola, M., Lappas, G., & Yannacopoulou, A. (2024). Generative AI in education: Assessing usability, ethical implications, and communication effectiveness. Societies, 14(12), 267.

[7] Vafadar, M., & Amani, A. M. (2024). Academic education in the era of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 3(1), 45–56.

[8] Wang, M. K., & Leong, W. Y. (2025). Implementation of multimodal assessments to address public speaking anxiety among college students. INTI Journal, 2025(2), 1–8.

[9] Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether ChatGPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14.

[10] Zhou, X., & Lee, M. (2024a). Generative AI in creative art: Enhancing artwork value and creative efficiency. PNAS Nexus, 1(1), 45–56.

Downloads

Published

29-08-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, X. (2025). AI-Assisted Practice of Visual Design for Traditional Cultural Symbols. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 12(2), 75-78. https://doi.org/10.54097/ggk2se09