Exploring Personal Information Protection Issues in the Context of Generative Artificial Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/dhs0sx91Keywords:
Generative artificial intelligence; Personal information protection; Algorithmic black box; Right to erasure; Three-dimensional governance pathway.Abstract
The full-chain mechanism of generative artificial intelligence—comprising the stages of “preparation–computation–generation”—has fundamentally transformed conventional modes of data processing. This transformation directly and substantively challenges traditional personal information protection frameworks. At the same time, it introduces a range of embedded risks, including data misuse and the opacity of the algorithmic black box As a result, existing regulatory mechanisms such as informed consent are increasingly ineffective in large-scale and highly automated application scenarios. In response, this paper proposes a regulatory framework oriented toward personal information risk prevention and control. Specifically, the framework emphasizes strengthening regulation to constrain key actors, employing privacy-preserving computation technologies to define AI-adapted legal rights and compliance standards, and enhancing users’ ability to exercise their rights effectively. Through these measures, a governance structure can be established in which technology, institutions, and responsible actors operate in coordination, thereby achieving a genuine balance between technological innovation and personal information protection.
Downloads
References
[1] Yang Q W, Tang Q. Conflicts and coordination between generative artificial intelligence and legal norms for personal information protection [J]. Henan Social Sciences, 2024, 32(12): 81–93.
[2] Luo v. Technology Co., Ltd., dispute over the right to privacy and personal information protection, Beijing Fourth Intermediate People’s Court (also known as the Beijing Railway Transport Intermediate Court), (2022) Jing 04 Civil Final No. 494.
[3] Zhang X B. Research on personal information protection in training data for generative artificial intelligence [J]. Chinese Journal of Law, 2024, (06): 86–107.
[4] Lin Z, Ng Y L. Unraveling gratifications, concerns, and acceptance of generative artificial intelligence [J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2025, 41(17): 10725–10742.
[5] Ye X B. Personal information protection in the context of generative artificial intelligence: Paradigm transformation and improvement of regulatory rules [J]. Jurists, 2025, (04): 61–73, 192.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

