Mechanisms and Effects of Digital Technology Empowering Government Performance Management: A Case Study of Yuhang District, Hangzhou
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/dsgxnz88Keywords:
digital technology, government performance management, whole‑process analysis.Abstract
Government performance management is a key measure for modern countries to improve their governance system and governance capacity and realize long‑term stability. However, it faces practical dilemmas including unclear indicator systems, distorted information collection, and insufficient application of results. In recent years, the rapid development of digital technology has provided new solutions to these problems. Existing studies have widely discussed the empowering mechanisms and effects of digital technology. Yet most studies focus on single links such as indicator design, data collection, or performance evaluation. They lack a systematic explanation of how digital technology works in the whole process of performance management. Therefore, this paper builds a whole‑process analytical framework consisting of indicator construction, information collection, result generation, performance attribution, and achievement utilization. Taking the digital government practice in Yuhang District, Hangzhou as a case, this paper deeply analyzes the operational mechanisms of digital technology empowering government performance management. The study finds that digital technology effectively solves defects in traditional public sector performance management. These defects include static and rigid indicators, subjective and distorted data, oversimplified evaluation, vague attribution, and improper result application. Digital technology achieves these improvements through dynamic indicator construction, concomitant data collection, algorithm‑driven result generation, intelligent performance attribution, and implementable achievement utilization. Theoretically, this paper expands the whole‑process perspective for explaining digital‑enabled performance management. Practically, it provides a reference for local governments to promote intelligent performance governance.
Downloads
References
[1] Sheng M K. Research Hotspots and Frontier Analysis of Chinese Government Performance Management——Based on the Method of Scientific Knowledge Map [J]. Administrative Forum, 2017(2): 47-55.
[2] People’s Daily Overseas Edition - State Council Issues Guiding Opinions on Strengthening the Construction of Digital Government [EB/OL]. [2026-03-14]. https://paper.people.com.cn/hwbwap/html/ 2022-06/24/content_25924888.htm.
[3] People’s Network of the Communist Party of China - Outline of the 15th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China (Draft) [EB/OL]. [2026-03-14]. https://cpc.people.com.cn/n1/2026/0306/c64387-40675997.html.
[4] Xu F F. Research on the Construction of Government Performance Management System Driven by Big Data——Based on the "Structure-Process-Value" Theoretical Model [J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2022, 44(9): 64-71.
[5] Quan Y Z, Wu J N. Key Elements and Practical Paths of High-Performance Digital Government Construction [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 44(4): 97-108.
[6] Chen L G. The Triple Mechanism of Digital Governance of Local Government Performance Evaluation Information——Also on the Deconstruction of Technical Limitations of Digital Government Affairs [J]. Journal of Henan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 47(5): 16-22.
[7] Ma L. Government Performance Management in the Big Data Era [J]. Theoretical Exploration, 2020(6): 14-22.
[8] Zhang H C, Xu G C. The Logic and Approach of Big Data Reshaping the Accuracy of Government Performance Evaluation [J]. Qiushi, 2022(4): 15-29, 109.
[9] ROGGE N, AGASISTI T, DE WITTE K. Big data and the measurement of public organizations’ performance and efficiency: The state-of-the-art [J]. Public Policy and Administration, 2017, 32(4): 263-281.
[10] Fu J J. The Efficiency Paradox of Information Technology in Community Governance and Its Formation Logic——An Empirical Analysis Based on J Sub-district in Shanghai [J]. Exploration, 2019(6): 54-63.
[11] Zhang L, Chen Y. Digital Government Performance Evaluation Based on Public Value: Theoretical Review and Conceptual Framework [J]. E-Government, 2021(7): 57-71.
[12] Wang X J. The Governance Transformation of China's Government Performance Management [J]. Theoretical Exploration, 2020(6): 5-13.
[13] PURNAMASARI R, HASANUDIN A I, ZULFIKAR R. Technological infrastructure and financial resource availability in enhancing public services and government performance: The role of digital innovation adoption in Indonesia [J]. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2025, 11: 101621.
[14] Cao X Q, Wang X Z. Digital Formalism: A Systematic Review, Theoretical Framework and Future Outlook [J]. E-Government, 2025(6): 64-77.
[15] Gao X D, Wang Q, Shen Q Y. How Do the Public Evaluate the Enthusiasm and Ability of "Street-Level Bureaucrats"?——Also on the Localization of Public Management Replication Experiments in the Chinese Context [J]. Public Management and Policy Review, 2023, 12(06): 31-44.
[16] WANG C, ZHU J, ZHANG D. The Paradox of Information Control Under Authoritarianism: Explaining Trust in Competing Messages in China [J]. Political Studies, 2024, 72(4): 1431-1452.
[17] Bai X Y, Kuang M M. Research on the Quality Control Mechanism of Government Digital Information Resources [J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2021, 44(07): 71-78.
[18] Hu Q, Wei X. "Blind Copying and Forwarding": Occurrence Logic and Generation Mechanism——A Case Analysis Based on Cultivated Land Protection Policies in H Province [J]. Journal of Yunnan Administration College, 2025, 27(05): 108-117.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

