Analysis of Challenges and Compliance Pathways for China's Data Regulation in Alignment with RCEP Data Flow Rules
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/k442f435Keywords:
cross-border data flows, RCEP, security exception clauses, enterprises' compliance.Abstract
With the rapid development of the digital economy, cross-border data flows have become a central issue in global economic and trade competition. The study utilizes the Security Exceptions Clause of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and China's Data Outflow Security Assessment System as entry points, examining the challenges and compliance pathways associated with flow regulations. Core issues. The study finds that there are two dilemmas in aligning China’s data regulations with RCEP rules. At the regulatory level, RCEP is based on the principle of free movement with security as an exception, while China prioritizes security and constrains free movement through evaluation. At the institutional level, issues such as unclear scope of "important data", lack of facilitation mechanisms, and insufficient regulatory coordination have resulted in high compliance costs for enterprises. In response to these issues, the national level should promote consensus on the interpretation of RCEP security exception clauses, clarify the leading department for data export, and improve the directory of “important data”. At the enterprise level, it is necessary to establish an internal compliance system, strengthen communication with regulatory authorities, and proactively apply for compliance certification. This study aims to provide a theoretical reference and practical guidance for enhancing the regulation of cross-border data flow in China and supporting enterprises in participating in international competition in compliance.
Downloads
References
[1] Hui Zhaobin. Risk management of cross-border data flow for enterprises in the era of data economy. Social Sciences Academic Press, 2018: 102-107.
[2] Feng Jinhui, Zhou Meng, et al. Regulation of cross-border data flows: Core issues, international schemes, and China's responses. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 38(4): 88-97.
[3] Hong Zhanggui, Huo Jianxing, et al. Regulation of cross-border data flows under RCEP and its significant impacts. Southwest Finance, 2022, (4): 83-94.
[4] Xu Duoqi. On the legal safeguards for enterprises' two-way compliance in cross-border data flow regulation. Eastern Journal of Law, 2020, (2): 185-197.
[5] Liu Junchao. China's security assessment measures for outbound data transfers. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 2023, 16(2): 267-282.
[6] Guo Duanxi. Study on the application of the basic security exceptions for cross-border data flows under RCEP. Contemporary Law Review, 2025, 39(4): 149-160.
[7] Andrew D. Mitchell, Neha Mishra, et al. Data security and trade agreements: The security exceptions. World Trade Review, 2023, 22(2): 201-218.
[8] Gao Henry. Data sovereignty and trade agreements: Three digital kingdoms. In: Anupam Chander, Haochen Sun, Eds. Data sovereignty: From the digital Silk Road to the return of the state. Oxford University Press, 2021: 213-239.
[9] Andrew D. Mitchell, Vrinda Gyanchandani, et al. Convergence & divergence in digital trade regulation: A comparative analysis of CP-TPP, RCEP, and EJSI. South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business, 2023, 19(2): 98-150.
[10] Mira Burri. Data flows and global trade law. In: Mira Burri, Ed. Big data and global trade law. Cambridge University Press, 2021: 1-44.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

