Qualitative Analysis of Criminal Characterization on Assisting in Crimes and Gaining Profits Therefrom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/qqepeh81Keywords:
Offense of aiding information network criminal activities, accomplices in cybercrime, helping behavior.Abstract
To effectively regulate, accurately penalize and systematically prevent assist cybercrimes, Article 287-2 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, which defines the offense of aiding cybercriminal activities, has been specifically established in China's Criminal Code. This paper aims to conduct a systematic comparative analysis and jurisprudential discussion on the offense of aiding cybercriminal activities in China's legal system, and the equivalent aiding cybercrime offenses established in major extraterritorial jurisdictions, including the United States, Germany and Japan. This study combines a series of typical specific cases in China's judicial practice in recent years, and carries out in-depth classification and empirical research on this category of crime with "provision of technical support, payment and settlement assistance" and "acquisition of illegal proceeds" as its core characteristics. Through the aforementioned multi-dimensional comparative analysis and case dissection, this study attempts to draw conclusions with both theoretical and practical value on the delimitation of boundaries between the offense of aiding cybercriminal activities and other equivalent aiding offenses involving illegal proceeds, in terms of constitutive elements, incrimination standards and judicial identification. Ultimately, the "aiding act + illicit gain" offenses are classified into three categories: "instrumental" aiding, cooperative aiding and post-offense aiding, and the proposed perspective is substantiated with specific case examples.
Downloads
References
[1] The 55th Statistical Report on the Development of China's Internet was released. Media Forum, 2025, 8(2): F0003.
[2] Zhang Jun. Work Report of the Supreme People's Court. People's Court Daily, 2026-03-10: 004.
[3] Liu Yanhong. The Judicial Expansion Trend and Substantive Restriction of the Crime of Assisting Information Network Criminal Activities. China Legal Review, 2023, (03): 58-72.
[4] Dong Xu, Xie Xinnan. Criminal Characterization of Payment and Settlement Assistance Behaviors: An Empirical Analysis Based on 237 Cases. Law Review of University of International Business and Economics, 2024, 8(01): 303-314.
[5] Mao Bin. The Predicament and Reflection on the Recognition of Knowledge in the Crime of Assisting Information Network Criminal Activities. Evidence Science, 2022, 30(06): 730-742.
[6] Chen Ying. Research on the Judicial Determination of the Crime of Assisting Information Network Criminal Activities. Sichuan Provincial Party School of the Communist Party of China, 2025.
[7] Roxin. Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, Band II. München: C. H. Beck, 2003: 26. 241.
[8] Nage Madoka. The Basic Theory of Japanese Negligence Offender and Accomplice. Chuo University, 2016.
[9] Ye Liangfang, Ma Luyao. The Development of Criminal Legislation on Cybercrime in the UK and Its Implications. Social Sciences Abroad, 2020, (05): 40-51.
[10] Dubber M. D. Criminalizing complicity: a comparative analysis. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2007, 5(4): 977-1001.
[11] Shi Xiongwen. Typological Analysis and Judicial Application of the Crime of Assisting Information Network Criminal Activities: Based on "Technical Support Type" and "Commercial Assistance Type" Behaviors. Journal of Huaqiao University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2025, (01): 103-115, 127.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

