Imagination in the Computational Era: Power Dynamics Among Algorithms, Curators and the Public

Authors

  • Xinhang Liu School of Design, Central Academy of Fine Arts, Beijing 100102, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/nrt5nj62

Keywords:

Algorithmic curation, data bias, AI curator, algorithmic ethics, critical reflection.

Abstract

Centered on algorithmic curation, this research adopts a problem-oriented research framework to trace the historical lineage of algorithmic curation to examine how algorithms integrate into curatorial practices, explores the potential of finding practical tools for contemporary design curation from algorithms’ underlying operational logics, and exploits the creative capacity of algorithms. Furthermore, it discusses and reflects on the ethical dilemmas of algorithmic curation, aiming to explore approaches and strategies for applying generative algorithms to curatorial work. The research breaks the anthropocentric curatorial paradigm, establishes a new model of knowledge production for exhibitions, and delivers novel insights and perspectives for the digital transformation of curation in China.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zhao, D. Y. (2021). From "Curation" to "Curatoriality" [Master’s thesis]. Central Academy of Fine Arts.

[2] Qiu, Z. J. (2020, September 29). Technological history as a perspective [Conference presentation online article]. Artron Art Network. https://m-news.artron.net/news/20260428/n1442056.html

[3] Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Les Presses du réel.

[4] Krysa, J. (2006). Curating immateriality: The work of the curator in the age of network systems. Autonomedia.

[5] Tyżlik-Carver, M. (2016). Curating in/as common/s: Posthuman curating and computational cultures [Doctoral dissertation]. Aarhus University.

[6] Onkaos. (2018). Memories of Passersby I (Companion version) [Art installation]. https://onkaos.com/work/memories-of-passersby-i-companion-version/

[7] Bucharest Biennale. (2025, October 15). Bucharest Biennale 12 announces “Freiraum”: A radical exploration of freedom in contemporary world [Press release]. https://bucharestbiennale.org/press/

[8] Wang, F. Y., & Zhang, J., & Zheng, N. N. (2016). From artificial intelligence to intelligence science. Acta Automatica Sinica, 42(7), 1015 103. https://doi.org/10.16383/j.aas.2016.c150838

[9] Choi, J. (2019, June 11). Exploring art with open access and AI: What’s next? The Metropolitan Museum of Art. https://www.metmuseum.org/perspectives/met-microsoft-mit-exploring-art-open-access-ai-whats-next

[10] Google Arts & Culture. (n.d.). Play with AI [Online project]. https://artsandculture.google.com/project/play-with-ai

[11] Pang, Y. J., & Zheng, S. H. (2022). From anthropomorphic creation to subjective creation: Boundaries of creativity in AI. Fine Arts Documents, (5).

[12] Pudong Art Museum. (2024, January 11). (Re-)focusing in the face of new technology — Seminar on Xu Bing’s Art. Artron Art Network. https://m-news.artron.net/20201222/n1128697.html

[13] Kelly, K. (2016). The inevitable: Understanding the 12 technological forces that will shape our future. Viking.

[14] Baudelaire, C. (1964). The painter of modern life and other essays. Phaidon Press.

[15] Martinon, J.-P. (2021). Curators serving the public good. Philosophies, 6(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies6020028

[16] Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press.

[17] Chen, X. X. (2022). Ethical crises of artificial intelligence algorithms and legal countermeasures [Master’s thesis]. Liaoning University.

[18] Wang, S. G. (2020). Algorithmic bias and its governance. Exploration and Free Views, (10).

Downloads

Published

25-08-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Liu, X. (2026). Imagination in the Computational Era: Power Dynamics Among Algorithms, Curators and the Public. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 17(1), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.54097/nrt5nj62