Research on the Influencing Factors of Adolescents' Ability to Identify Digital Financial Risks

Authors

  • Chuyue Li Shandong Heze No. 1 Middle School, Heze, Shandong, 274000, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/8nwerb70

Keywords:

Adolescents, Digital Financial Literacy, Online Fraud, Risk Identification, Financial Education, Overconfidence

Abstract

Teenagers today grow up with mobile wallets, online shops, in-game currencies and short-video advertisements. This is both a convenience and a risk for young people because they may be targeted with phishing links, scams and “guaranteed profit” offers. In this paper, the simple question is asked – why are some adolescents far better than others at recognising these risks? Three hundred and twenty students in Grades 9–12 completed a questionnaire and a recognition test with 12 scenarios. The results indicate that the average student was able to correctly identify little more than 7 of the 12 risk scenarios. The four factors, which were clearly related to the higher score were: school financial education (r=0.52), family conversations about money (r=0.44), general digital literacy (r=0.38) and self-control (r=0.35). These factors, in combination with age accounted for approximately 47% of the variance among students. One of the most interesting results was the “confidence gap” in which about 63% of students overrated their own ability to spot a scam. The paper concludes that risk identification is not a natural ability and that the two biggest levers for doing a better job are in the school and family.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume IV): How financially smart are students? OECD Publishing. https:// doi. org/ 10.1787/5a849c2a en.

[2] Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2025). Internet crime report 2024. Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3).

[3] Pew Research Center. (2025, July 31). Online scams and attacks in America today. Pew Research Center.

[4] Federal Reserve Financial Services. (2026, August). How teens and young adults are victimized: Understanding scam risk across customer segments. FedPayments Improvement.

[5] Better Business Bureau. (2025). 2024 BBB scam tracker risk report. BBB Institute for Marketplace Trust.

[6] Zaimovic, A., & et al. (2024). Measuring digital financial literacy. Procedia Computer Science, 236, 574 581. https:// doi. org/ 10.1016/j.procs.2024.05.069.

[7] Choung, Y., Chatterjee, S., & Pak, T. Y. (2025). Digital financial literacy and life satisfaction: Evidence from South Korea. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), Article 94. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/bs15010094.

[8] Mancone, S., Tosti, B., Corrado, S., Spica, G., Zanon, A., & Diotaiuti, P. (2024, October). Youth, money, and behavior: The impact of financial literacy programs. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1397060. https://doi.org/10.3389/ feduc. 2024. 13 97060.

[9] Tan, X., Xiao, J. J., Meng, K., & Xu, J. (2025). Financial education and budgeting behavior among college students: Extending the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 43(3), 506 521.

[10] Ho, C. S. M., Gumus, S., Choi, S., & Barajeeh, B. (2026, January). Financial literacy education, confidence, and digital financial behavior among adolescents: Evidence from 19 countries. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 50, Article e70188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70188.

[11] F Secure. (2025, November). Scam intelligence and impacts report. F Secure Corporation.

[12] Federal Trade Commission. (2024, February). Consumer Sentinel Network data book 2023. Federal Trade Commission.

Downloads

Published

01-09-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, C. (2026). Research on the Influencing Factors of Adolescents’ Ability to Identify Digital Financial Risks. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 17(2), 74-78. https://doi.org/10.54097/8nwerb70