Macro-level Governance Environment and Occupational Health: A Comparison of Pneumoconiosis Policies

Authors

  • Boyan Tong Wuhan Britain-China School, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/j0mks270

Keywords:

Pneumoconiosis Governance, Occupational Health, Macro-governance Environment, Two-way Fixed-effects Model, Case Study

Abstract

Under the background of the "Healthy China" initiative and the continuous improvement of the occupational health system, pneumoconiosis still poses a challenge to the health rights and interests of workers and the ability of public governance. This disease has the characteristics of long incubation period, irreversible course, and difficult traceability of responsibility. This article reviews the experience of the United States and other developed countries in the control of pneumoconiosis, and uses the panel data of 31 provincial administrative units in China from 2007 to 2023 to construct a two-way fixed effect model. Given data limitations, the reported incidence rate of tuberculosis is used as a proxy indicator to examine macro-level factors such as industrial structure, industrial pollution, public services, labor protection, and medical resources. The study also analyzes institutional inflection points in China’s governance of pneumoconiosis by combining policy documents with prosecutorial case studies. The study found that the share of the secondary sector and sulfur dioxide emissions is significantly and positively correlated with reported incidence rates, while the share of healthcare expenditure, urbanization rates, and infrastructure are significantly and negatively correlated. The relationship between the number of workers covered by work-related injury insurance, the allocation of healthcare professionals, and human capital lacks stability. Case studies further indicate that the coordination among workplace protection, occupational health records, occupational disease diagnosis, work-related injury determination, and benefit payments is a key institutional condition affecting the prevention of pneumoconiosis and the protection of patients. Based on these findings, this paper proposes that the development of the pneumoconiosis management system for the 15th Five-Year Plan should strengthen dust control at the source, protection for high-risk populations, grassroots occupational health services, cross-regional information coordination, and long-term collaborative care, thereby promoting the coordinated development of occupational health risk prevention and control and the protection of workers’ rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Heppleston, A. G. (1988). Prevalence and pathogenesis of pneumoconiosis in coal workers. Environmental Health Perspectives, 78, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8878159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8878159

[2] Fujimura, N. (2000). Pathology and pathophysiology of pneumoconiosis. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 6(2), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1097/00063198-200003000-00010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00063198-200003000-00010

[3] Leung, C. C., Yu, I. T. S., & Chen, W. (2012). Silicosis. The Lancet, 379(9830), 2008–2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60235-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60235-9

[4] GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. (2020). Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019. The Lancet, 396(10258), 1204–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9

[5] Qi, X. M., Luo, Y., Song, M. Y., et al. (2021). Pneumoconiosis: current status and future prospects. Chinese Medical Journal, 134(8), 898–907. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001461

[6] Mehta, A. J., Miedinger, D., Keidel, D., et al. (2012). Occupational exposure to dusts, gases, and fumes and incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 185(12), 1292–1300. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201111-2041OC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201110-1917OC

[7] Rose, C., Heinzerling, A., Patel, K., et al. (2019). Severe silicosis in engineered stone fabrication workers: California, Colorado, Texas, and Washington, 2017–2019. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68(38), 813–818. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6838a1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6838a1

[8] Hoy, R. F., Baird, T., Hammerschlag, G., et al. (2018). Artificial stone-associated silicosis: a rapidly emerging occupational lung disease. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 75(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2017-104686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2017-104428

[9] Blackley, D. J., Halldin, C. N., & Laney, A. S. (2018). Continued increase in prevalence of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis in the United States, 1970–2017. American Journal of Public Health, 108(9), 1220–1222. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304517

[10] Hall, N. B., Blackley, D. J., Halldin, C. N., & Laney, A. S. (2019). Current review of pneumoconiosis among U.S. coal miners. Current Environmental Health Reports, 6(3), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-019-00241-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-019-00237-5

[11] Mazurek, J. M., Wood, J. M., Blackley, D. J., & Weissman, D. N. (2018). Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis-attributable years of potential life lost in terms of life expectancy and potential life lost before age 65: United States, 1999–2016. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(30), 819–824. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6730a3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6730a3

[12] Derickson, A. (1998). Black lung: Anatomy of a public health disaster. Cornell University Press.

[13] Boden, L. I., & Ozonoff, A. (2008). Capture-recapture estimates of nonfatal workplace injuries and illnesses. Annals of Epidemiology, 18(6), 500–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.02.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.11.003

[14] Leigh, J. P. (2011). Economic burden of occupational injury and illness in the United States. Milbank Quarterly, 89(4), 728–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00648.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00648.x

[15] Blanc, P. D., Annesi-Maesano, I., Balmes, J. R., et al. (2019). The occupational burden of nonmalignant respiratory diseases: an official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society statement. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 199(11), 1312–1334. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201904-0726ST. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201904-0717ST

[16] National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (2021). The OSH Act—A response to workplace tragedies. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[17] Mine Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). History. U.S. Department of Labor.

[18] Mine Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). History of Mine Safety and Health Legislation. U.S. Department of Labor.

[19] U.S. Department of Labor, Benefits Review Board. (n.d.). Black Lung Deskbook, Part I: General History and Purposes. U.S. Department of Labor.

[20] U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2009). Black Lung Benefits Program: Administrative and Structural Changes Could Improve Miners’ Ability to Pursue Claims. U.S. Government Accountability Office.

[21] National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (2024). Hierarchy of Controls. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[22] Mine Safety and Health Administration. (2014). Lowering miners’ exposure to respirable coal mine dust, including continuous personal dust monitors. Federal Register, 79 FR 24813.

[23] National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (2021). Respiratory health research at NIOSH. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[24] Safe Work Australia. (2024). Engineered Stone Ban. Australian Government.

[25] National Health Commission et al. (2021, December 7). National Plan for the Prevention and Control of Occupational Diseases (2021–2025).

[26] Wu, Q. (2024, April 26). “Half the Time, Half the Tasks” in the National Plan for the Prevention and Control of Occupational Diseases. Health Daily.

[27] Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. (2018, December 29). Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Prevention and Control of Occupational Diseases (Amended in 2018).

[28] Supreme People’s Procuratorate. (2025, February 27). Beware of Occupational Diseases! Protecting Neglected Health—“Safeguarding Workers” Series Report 4.

[29] Supreme People’s Procuratorate. (2025, August 4). Rescuing Those “Trapped” in Dust.

[30] Supreme People’s Procuratorate. (2023, April 28). “Procuratorial Work Serving the People”—A Series of Typical Cases on Administrative Procuratorial Work in Step with the People (11th Batch).

[31] World Health Organization, & International Labour Organization. (2021). WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-Related Burden of Disease and Injury, 2000–2016: Global Monitoring Report. World Health Organization and International Labour Organization.

[32] National Health Commission. (2021, July 13). Statistical Bulletin on the Development of China’s Health Sector in 2020.

[33] State Council. (2026, July 7). Notice of the State Council on Issuing the “15th Five-Year Plan for National Health” (State Council Document [2026] No. 23).

[34] National Center for Disease Control and Prevention, et al. (2026, July 21). Notice on Issuing the “15th Five-Year Plan for Disease Prevention and Control” (Guojikong Guicai Fa [2026] No. 17).

[35] National Health Commission. (2021, January 4). Measures for the Administration of Occupational Disease Diagnosis and Appraisal (Order No. 6 of the National Health Commission).

[36] National Health Commission. (2022, August 5). Response to Proposal No. 6635 of the Fifth Session of the 13th National People’s Congress.

[37] National Health Commission. (2024, April 25). Transcript of the National Health Commission Press Conference on April 25, 2024.

Downloads

Published

28-10-2026

Issue

Section

Articles