Supply Chain Risk Prediction and Management Based on Structural Equation Modeling and Random Forest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/y0pp3q67Keywords:
Supply Chain Management, Structural Equation Modeling, Machine Learning, Risk Prediction, Data Analysis, Decision SupportAbstract
In order to effectively solve the financial and economic problems of the modern supply chain, this paper designs a combined framework that integrates Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) model and Random Forest (RF) algorithm. In the first part, the thesis applies SEM to empirical data from various industries, directly identifying the causal relationships between risk factors. These findings are then utilized by the RF component, facilitating risk prediction. Through comparative experiments, this SEM-RF integration model has achieved better prediction accuracy, recall and F1 score than the standalone version of SEM and RF. Feature importance analysis reveals that supplier delivery latency, demand volatility and transportation timeliness have the most significant impact on risk. By optimizing management practices according to these conclusions, enterprises can reduce costs and enhance agility. Therefore, this paper provides a new theoretical perspective for supply chain risk forecasting and also offers decision-making support.
Downloads
References
[1] Gottimukkala, S. R., & Bhuram, S. K. (2025). Prescriptive Analytics for Next-Gen Supply Chains: Integrating Causal AI with Digital Twin Technologies. IEEE Transactions on Vision and Artificial Intelligence. [Link]
[2] Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021). A digital supply chain twin for managing disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 59(12), 3791–3803.
[3] Kache, F., & Seuring, S. (2017). Challenges and opportunities of digital information at the intersection of Big Data Analytics and supply chain management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(1), 10–36.
[4] Prajogo, D., Oke, A., & Olhager, J. (2018). Supply chain processes: Linking supply logistics integration, supply performance, lean processes, and firm performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(9), 1887–1907.
[5] Chong, A. Y. L., Lo, C. K. Y., & Weng, X. (2019). The business value of IT investments on supply chain: A contingency perspective. Journal of Business Research, 99, 326–339.
[6] Wang, G., Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W. T., & Papadopoulos, T. (2020). Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107617.
[7] Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Roubaud, D., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2021). Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), 110–128.
[8] Riahi, Y., Khouja, M., & Sivarajah, U. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications in supply chain: A systematic review and future research directions. Annals of Operations Research, 319, 877–934.
[9] Ivanov, D. (2023). Supply chain viability and the COVID-19 pandemic: A conceptual and formal generalisation of four major adaptation strategies. International Journal of Production Research, 61(5), 1680–1697.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic Journal of Science and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








