Real-Time Junction Temperature Estimation for Using Temperature-Sensitive Electrical Parameters

Authors

  • Yuchen Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/2qvmw561

Keywords:

SiC MOSFET; Junction Temperature Estimation; Temperature-Sensitive Electrical Parameters (TSEPs); Data-Driven Modeling.

Abstract

Silicon Carbide Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors (SiC MOSFETs) are core components in high-power systems like new energy vehicle powertrains and solar inverters, thanks to their high breakdown voltage, low on-state loss, and strong high-temperature tolerance. However, their junction temperature (TJ ) rises sharply under high-power/frequency operations, and extreme TJ fluctuations cause solder cracking or wire bonding detachment, shortening service life and risking system failure. Accurate real-time TJ measurement is critical for reliability. Traditional methods have flaws: infrared thermometers lack real-time capability, and built-in sensors require device redesign. Temperature-Sensitive Electrical Parameters (TSEPs)—which use the device’s intrinsic electrical parameters (correlated with TJ )—offer a non-invasive solution without physical contact or design changes, becoming a key research focus. This paper first classifies common TSEPs (static: RDS,ON, VDS,ON; dynamic: TD,OFF, VVTH) and explains their temperature sensitivity and application scenarios. It then elaborates on three TJ prediction models: traditional mathematical models (polynomial fitting, thermal network fusion), data-driven models (BPNN, DNN), and multi-TSEP fusion models. A specialized experimental circuit for TSEP acquisition (using Kelvin source parasitic inductance and digital isolation) is also presented, enabling real-time measurement in one PWM cycle. Finally, the paper identifies practical challenges (parasitic interference, aging-induced accuracy loss, poor extreme-condition adaptability) and proposes solutions like Kelvin connections and adaptive calibration. Future directions include exploring stable TSEPs and integrating measurement circuits into miniaturized chips, supporting SiC MOSFET thermal management and reliability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Kim M K, Yoon Y D, Yoon S W. Actual Maximum Junction Temperature Estimation Process of Multichip SiC MOSFET Power Modules with New Calibration Method and Deep Learning[J]. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron., 2023, 11(6): 5602-5612.

[2] Liu Q, Du X, Wang Z, et al. SiC MOSFETs Junction Temperature Estimation Method Considering Aging Influence[C]. 2023 6th Asia Conf. Energy Electr. Eng. (ACEEE), 2023: 71-75.

[3] Afanasenko V, Solomakha O, Kallfass I. Online Degradation Detection and Estimation of SiC Power MOSFET based on TSEP[C]. 2024 IEEE 10th Int. Power Electron. Motion Control Conf. (IPEMC2024-ECCE Asia), 2024: 3986-3991.

[4] Schmitz L, Austrup I, De Doncker R W. Robustness Analysis of Temperature-Sensitive Electrical Parameters of SiC MOSFETs[C]. 2025 IEEE Energy Convers. Congr. Expo. Asia (ECCE-Asia), 2025: 1-8.

[5] Hosseinabadi F, Jaman S, Bhoi S K, et al. Implementation of onsite Junction Temperature Estimation for a SiC MOSFET Module for Condition Monitoring[C]. 2022 EPE'22 ECCE Europe, 2022: 1-6.

[6] Wang H, Liang G, Xu Z, et al. A Junction Temperature Estimation Method in SiC MOSFET Modules Based on the Turn-off Delay Time and Vds Overshoot[C]. 2023 IEEE 10th Int. Conf. Power Electron. ECCE Asia (ICPE 2023-ECCE Asia), 2023: 3386-3391.

[7] Muñoz Barón K, Dash S S, Koch D, et al. Realtime Junction Temperature Estimation in SiC Power Modules Based on Multiple TSEP Acquisition[C]. 2024 PCIM Europe, 2024: 1973-1981.

[8] Wu W J, Chen X. SiC MOSFET Full Junction Temperature Estimation Modeling Method Based on Data Driving[C]. 2024 IEEE 10th Int. Power Electron. Motion Control Conf. (IPEMC2024-ECCE Asia), 2024: 4823-4828.

Downloads

Published

13-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yang, Y. (2026). Real-Time Junction Temperature Estimation for Using Temperature-Sensitive Electrical Parameters . Academic Journal of Science and Technology, 19(3), 313-318. https://doi.org/10.54097/2qvmw561