Comparative Learning Method for Drug Target Interaction Prediction Based on Heterogeneous Network
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/529xas83Keywords:
Drug-target interaction prediction, Heterogeneous graph neural network, Contrast learning, Model optimization.Abstract
Drug-Target Interaction (DTI) prediction serves as a pivotal task for accelerating drug repositioning and novel drug development, significantly reducing the time and costs of traditional experiments. Heterogeneous graph neural networks (hgnns) have become mainstream due to their capability to integrate multi-source biological data across "drug-target-disease-side effect" relationships. This paper examines the three-stage evolutionary trajectory of dti prediction methods using 2024's hncl-dti anchor papers as core references. It clarifies the characteristics of common datasets like hbn-a/b and evaluation metrics such as auc and aupr, while focusing on current bottlenecks including dataset scale bias, insufficient staticity, poor domain-specific model adaptation, and lack of interpretability. by comparing vertical domain solutions with general-domain approaches from the 2024-2025 ccf category a conference, the study evaluates the applicability of techniques like inductive learning and bias-corrected sampling. The core conclusion proposes integrating biomedical characteristics with general technologies to construct multi-source dynamic datasets and knowledge-enhanced hgnns. Future efforts should focus on knowledge-enhanced heterogeneous graph learning by deeply embedding biological knowledge (e.g., drug mechanisms and target annotations) into models, combining general-domain adaptive projection and attentional attribution techniques. This will establish a dual-dimensional evaluation system for "predictive performance and clinical applicability," ultimately achieving technical goals of "high precision, high interpretability, and high inductiveness" to provide more practical support for drug development.
Downloads
References
[1] Nosengo N. Can you teach old drugs new tricks? Nature, 2016, 534 (7607): 314-316.
[2] Morris G M, et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4. J Comput Chem, 2009, 30 (16): 2785-2791.
[3] Keiser M J, et al. Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs. Nature, 2009, 462 (7270): 175-181.
[4] Wang H, et al. Debiased Contrastive Learning for Imbalanced Graph Data. NeurIPS, 2024.
[5] Li M, et al. Heterogeneous graph attention network. ACM SIGKDD, 2022.
[6] Liu M, et al. Interpretable Contrastive Learning via Attention Attribution. ICLR, 2025.
[7] Zhang Y, et al. IMCHGAN. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 2023.
[8] Hu J, et al. A Heterogeneous Network-based Contrastive Learning Approach for Predicting Drug-Target Interaction. IEEE BIBM, 2024.
[9] Huang K, et al. MultiDTI. Comput Biol Chem, 2020, 88: 107402.
[10] Li L, et al. Inductive Heterogeneous Graph Learning with Dynamic Node Types. ICML, 2024.
[11] Yang Y, et al. Graph Contrastive Learning under Heterophily via Graph Filters. ICML, 2024.
[12] Zhang D, Jiang C, Zheng Y, et al. Weighted-Reward Preference Optimization for Implicit Model Fusion. ICLR, 2025.
[13] Chen J, et al. Semantic-Aware Heterogeneous Graph Attention with Edge Type Prior. ICML, 2024.
[14] Wang Z, et al. Dynamic Hypergraph Contrastive Learning for Multi-Relational Drug-Gene Interaction Prediction. NeurIPS, 2024.
[15] Li S, et al. Rationale-Aware Graph Contrastive Learning (RGCL). ICLR, 2025.
[16] Zhang Y, et al. GCNII: Enhanced Deep Graph Convolutional Networks with Initial Residual and Identity Mapping.ICML,2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Science and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








