UAV Combat Effectiveness Evaluation in Complex Mountain Environments Based on AHP-EWM

Authors

  • Jiechao Cao
  • Qiwu Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/09ngxj05

Keywords:

Complex Mountainous Environment, UAV, Cooperative Reconnaissance and Strike, Operational Effectiveness Evaluation, AHP-EWM, Evaluation Index System

Abstract

To address the challenge of evaluating the operational effectiveness of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) cooperative reconnaissance and strike missions against ground tactical targets in complex mountainous environments, this study constructs a scientific and highly adaptive comprehensive evaluation framework. Based on a subjective-objective combined weighting strategy integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Entropy Weight Method (EWM), a multi-dimensional comprehensive evaluation index system is established, which covers six core dimensions: information acquisition, target recognition, command and decision-making, strike effectiveness, cooperative efficiency, and mountain adaptability. Weighting results indicate that strike effectiveness and mountain adaptability are the dominant dimensions that determine the overall operational effectiveness of UAVs. Specifically, the terrain-corrected circular error probable and the terrain-matched flight index occupy core positions in the strike effectiveness and mountain adaptability dimensions, respectively. This proposed framework provides an operable theoretical foundation and practical guidance for the quantitative evaluation of UAV cooperative reconnaissance and strike effectiveness, identification of system shortcomings, optimization of resource allocation, and formulation of tactical decisions in complex mountainous environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Wenlin Chen, Shuai Wang, Chong Jiang, et al. Research on Explainability Methods for Unmanned Combat Decision-Making Models[J]. IEEE Access,2024, 12: 83502-83512.

[2] Haoran Han, Jian Cheng, Maolong Lv, et al. Augmenting the Robustness of Tactical Maneuver Decision-Making in Unmanned Aerial Combat Vehicles During Dogfights via Prioritized Population Play With Diversified Partners[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2025,61(5): 12892-12907.

[3] WANG X, YANG Z, CHAI S, et al. Tactical intent-driven autonomous air combat behavior generation method [J]. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2025, 11 (1): 65–87.

[4] WANG J, PAN C, ZHANG Q. Double weighted combat data quality evaluation method based on CVF optimized FAHP [J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15 (1): 2516–2531.

[5] Bowen Zhang, Witold Pedrycz, Aminah Robinson Fayek, et al. A Differential Evolution-Based Consistency Improvement Method in AHP With an Optimal Allocation of Information Granularity[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2022, 52(7): 6733-6744.

[6] Taotao Qin, Mingfeng Liu, Siyuan Ji, et al. Parameter Weight Analysis of Synchronous Induction Electromagnetic Coil Launch System Based on the Entropy Weight Method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science,2024,52(5):1865-1873.

Downloads

Published

05-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Cao, J., & Wu, Q. (2026). UAV Combat Effectiveness Evaluation in Complex Mountain Environments Based on AHP-EWM. Academic Journal of Science and Technology, 20(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.54097/09ngxj05