Foundational Study on Magnetic-Chain-Based Magnetic Flux Leakage Detection for High-Throughput Screening of Under-Magnetized Small Permanent Magnets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/aexbjt18Keywords:
Small permanent magnet; magnetic chain; magnetic flux leakage; Hall sensor; finite-element analysis; batch inspection.Abstract
Small permanent magnets are indispensable functional components in smart electronic products, where the stability of magnetization directly influences actuation, positioning, sensing, acoustic output, and overall system reliability. In industrial production, however, the final magnetic performance of a small magnet is sensitive to raw-material fluctuations, local field nonuniformity, fixture tolerance, and process disturbance during magnetization. The dominant failure mode is insufficient magnetization intensity, which creates under-magnetized or “NG” parts. Existing commercial inspection equipment usually adopts a discrete strategy in which each magnet is measured independently. Although this approach offers high accuracy, its serial nature limits throughput and is increasingly incompatible with large-scale manufacturing. To support high-speed screening, this work develops a foundational study of magnetic-chain-based magnetic flux leakage (MFL) detection using Hall sensing and finite-element analysis. Rather than treating each magnet as an isolated inspection target, the method organizes multiple magnets into a chain and evaluates whether the leakage-field distribution along the chain can preserve sufficient contrast for reliable NG identification. A three-dimensional Ansys Maxwell model is established using NdFe36 permanent magnets, with a single under-magnetized magnet embedded at the center of the chain. The study first constructs the batch-detection framework, then investigates the signal morphology obtained along vertical and horizontal sensing directions, and finally introduces direction-dependent threshold metrics for quantitative discrimination. For magnet lengths of 10, 8, and 6 mm, the vertical-direction thresholds are 40.35, 37.95, and 31.71, respectively, whereas the horizontal-direction thresholds are 27.99, 29.35, and 28.35. The results show that each magnet produces a quasi-N-shaped leakage signature in the vertical direction and a quasi-parabolic signature in the horizontal direction. More importantly, the vertical arrangement consistently provides stronger NG contrast and clearer waveform separation. This work therefore solves a key early-stage problem for magnetic-chain inspection: how to preserve both throughput and signal distinguishability in a batch-screening configuration. The study provides a physically interpretable detection metric, identifies the more favorable sensing direction, and offers direct guidance for subsequent equipment design, algorithm development, and extension toward more complex magnetic-chain inspection scenarios.
Downloads
References
[1] Ramsden, E. Hall-Effect Sensors: Theory and Application, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2011.
[2] Coey, J. M. D. Perspective and prospects for rare earth permanent magnets. Engineering 2020, 6(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.034.
[3] Coey, J. M. D. Rare-Earth Iron Permanent Magnets; Oxford University Press: New York, 1996.
[4] Feng, B.; Wu, J.; Tu, H.; Tang, J.; Kang, Y. A review of magnetic flux leakage nondestructive testing. Materials 2022, 15(20), 7362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15207362.
[5] Sharif, N. A.; Ramli, R.; Mohamed, A. Z.; Nuawi, M. Z. Theory and development of magnetic flux leakage sensor for flaws detection: A review. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences 2019, 8(3), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v8.i3.pp208-216.
[6] Shi, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, R.; Cai, M.; Jia, G. Theory and application of magnetic flux leakage pipeline detection. Sensors 2015, 15(12), 31036–31055. https://doi.org/10.3390/s151229845.
[7] Suresh, V.; Abudhahir, A.; Daniel, J. Development of magnetic flux leakage measuring system for detection of defect in small diameter steam generator tube. Measurement 2017, 95, 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.10.015.
[8] Tang, J.; Kang, Y.; Wu, J.; et al. Mechanism of magnetic flux leakage detection method based on slotted ferromagnetic lift-off layer. Sensors 2022, 22, 3370. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093370.
[9] Azad, A.; Lee, J. J.; Kim, N. Semi-precise analytical method for investigating the liftoff variation on the Hall sensor in metal defect sensing. Sensors 2021, 21(16), 5539. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165539.
[10] Kim, H. M.; Heo, C. G.; Cho, S.-H.; Park, G. S. Determination scheme for accurate defect depth in underground pipeline inspection by using magnetic flux leakage sensors. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2018, 54(11), 6201805. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2018.2853618.
[11] Schmitte, T.; Nitsche, S.; Groos, A. Modelling of magnetic flux leakage measurements of steel pipes. In Proceedings of ECNDT 2006, Berlin, Germany, 2006.
[12] Croat, J. J.; Herbst, J. F.; Lee, R. W.; Pinkerton, F. E. Pr-Fe and Nd-Fe-based materials: A new class of high-performance permanent magnets. Journal of Applied Physics 1984, 55(6), 2078–2082. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.333571.
[13] Cullity, B. D.; Graham, C. D. Introduction to Magnetic Materials, 2nd ed.; IEEE/Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2009.
[14] Jiles, D. Introduction to Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2015.
[15] Zienkiewicz, O. C.; Taylor, R. L.; Zhu, J. Z. The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals, 7th ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Science and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








