Reforming Auditing Education in the AI Era: A Three-Stage Progressive Teaching Model and Its Policy Implications for Higher Education

Authors

  • Li Li International College, Guangzhou College of Commerce, Guangdong 511363, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/pqqg5h69

Keywords:

Auditing curriculum reform, competency-based learning, higher education policy, digital transformation.

Abstract

As artificial intelligence and digital technologies become deeply embedded in the auditing profession, the structural gap between conventional university curricula and evolving industry demands has grown increasingly pronounced. This paper reports on a systematic teaching reform of an undergraduate Auditing course, validated across multiple academic cycles, which addresses three core pedagogical pain points: fragmented knowledge structures, the failure to integrate AI and digital tools into instruction, and insufficient team-based project experience. Drawing on diagnostic surveys of 225 students, the course was redesigned around a "Three-Stage Progressive" model encompassing two coordinated innovations: a "Three-Module, Five-Dimensional Integration" content restructuring, and a dual-track approach combining AI-driven instructional methods with team-based project learning and portfolio assessment. Post-reform data show significant improvements in student academic performance, digital competency, and professional identity. On this basis, the paper advances five higher education policy recommendations for reforming accounting and auditing programmes in the AI era, addressing curriculum governance, industry-embedded practicum frameworks, and competency-oriented assessment systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bakarich, K. M., & O'Brien, P. E. (2021). The robots are coming … but aren't here yet: The use of artificial intelligence technologies in the public accounting profession. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 18(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-2020-0321.

[2] Baldwin, A. A., Chiu, V., Liu, Q., & Muehlmann, B. (2023). Technology agility supported by a growth mindset: A new requirement for accounting curricula. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 20(2), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-2022-0260

[3] Ng, C. (2023). Teaching advanced data analytics, robotic process automation, and artificial intelligence in a graduate accounting program. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 20(1), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-2022-0174

[4] Dogaru, M., Pisīcă, O., Popa, C. Ş., Răgman, A. A., & Tololoi, I. R. (2025). The perceived impact of artificial intelligence on academic learning. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1611183. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1611183

[5] Gordon, M., Daniel, M., Ajiboye, A., O'Sullivan, M., Shadbolt, N., & Harden, R. (2024). A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84. Medical Teacher, 46(4), 446–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425694.2023.2299417.

Downloads

Published

30-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, L. (2026). Reforming Auditing Education in the AI Era: A Three-Stage Progressive Teaching Model and Its Policy Implications for Higher Education. Academic Journal of Science and Technology, 21(3), 76-79. https://doi.org/10.54097/pqqg5h69