Life-Cycle Cost Management of Construction Projects under the Green Concept

Jiale Shen

doi:10.54097/fpj53636

Authors

Jiale Shen College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, 211816 Nanjing, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fpj53636

Keywords:

Green building; full life cycle; cost management; construction project; integrated management system.

Abstract

To promote the sustainable development of the green building industry, this paper conducts research on the full life cycle cost management of construction projects under the green concept. Firstly, it reviews the relevant theoretical connotations, this is the foundation, analyzes the problems such as narrow management perspective and incomplete accounting system, and constructs a four-dimensional integrated management system consisting of the target layer, accounting layer, control layer, and technology layer. It also proposed differentiated control strategies for the four stages: planning and design, construction, operation and maintenance, and demolition and recycling. The full life-cycle cost management of green buildings cannot merely focus on economic costs. Instead, a three-dimensional accounting system integrating economy, environment and society should be established. By relying on collaborative control and digital technology, the balance between short-term green investments and long-term comprehensive benefits can be achieved, providing a theoretical reference for the implementation of green building cost management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] B. T. Liu, “Research on the Whole Process Cost Management Strategy for Construction Projects [J].” Mar. Outlook. 04:163-165 (2026)

[2] P. Miraj, M. A. Berawi, and S. R. Utami, "Economic feasibility of green office building: combining life cycle cost analysis and cost–benefit evaluation." Build. Res. Inf. 49(6): 624-638 (2021)

[3] T. Sartori, R. Drogemuller, S. Omrani, F. Lamari, "A schematic framework for life cycle assessment (LCA) and green building rating system (GBRS)." J. Build. Eng. 38: 102180 (2021)

[4] W. T. Franca, M. V. Barros, R. Salvador, A.C.de Francisco, M. T. Moreira, C. M. Piekarski, "Integrating life cycle assessment and life cycle cost: A review of environmental-economic studies." Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 26(2): 244-274 (2021)

[5] X. Qi, H. Bai, “Research on Influencing Factors and Control of Green Building Costs [J].” North. Archit. 10 (06):68-72 (2025)

[6] F. Zhou, “Construction Project Life Cycle Cost Control System Construction [J].” Chin. Mark. 04:135-138. (2026). DOI:10.13939/ j. cnki. zgsc.

[7] S. S. Ali, A. Abushaikha, “Comparative assessment of LEED, BREEAM, and GSAS in achieving environmental impact reduction: A performance-based analysis[J].” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1587(1):012035 (2026). DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/1587/1/012035

[8] Y. Liu, X. Guo, and F. Hu, "Cost-benefit analysis on green building energy efficiency technology application: A case in China." Energy Build. 82: 37-46 (2014)

[9] W. J. Zhang, Research on Cost Control Strategies for the Entire Lifecycle of Green Buildings [J]. Inner Mong. Sci. Technol. Econ. 79-82 (2025)

[10] L. Zhang, Analysis of Cost Control Strategies in Green Construction Project Management [J]. Archit. Budg.06:46-48 (2025).