Challenges and Opportunities Facing Solid-State Electrolytes

Authors

  • Yi Mu Department of Queen Mary University of London Engineering School, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/gj28me18

Keywords:

Lithium-ion batteries; solid electrolytes; electrolyte properties.

Abstract

Global energy demand is increasing. Environmental pollution and climate change are also becoming more serious. These problems make the development of energy storage batteries more important. These batteries need high energy density, better safety, and long cycle life. Liquid lithium-ion batteries are mature and widely used. However, they still have several problems. The electrolyte and electrodes may have clear side reactions during battery use. Liquid electrolytes are also easy to burn and easy to evaporate. These problems can reduce battery safety. In contrast, solid-state batteries use solid-state electrolytes instead of liquid electrolytes. This change gives solid-state batteries good potential in safety, stability, and energy density. This paper focuses on solid-state electrolytes. It reviews the material features, performance advantages, main problems, and improvement methods of oxide, sulfide, polymer, and composite solid-state electrolytes. Different types of solid-state electrolytes have different properties. Oxide and sulfide electrolytes are inorganic solid-state electrolytes. They usually have good thermal stability and relatively high ionic conductivity. Polymer electrolytes have better flexibility. Composite electrolytes do a decent job of blending the strengths of organic and inorganic materials, but they still face some common issues. Their ionic conductivity may not be high enough, the interface resistance is often pretty large, and their stability is still somewhat limited. This study helps explain why different solid-state electrolytes perform the way they do, and it also offers some useful pointers for designing better materials and pushing solid-state battery development further.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Kitalu Ricin Ngoy, Valantine Takwa Lukong, Kelvin O. Yoro, et al. Lithium-ion batteries and the future of sustainable energy: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2025, 223: 115971.

[2] Zhong Zheng, Hong Zhao, Ruth Knibbe, et al. Advances and challenges in inorganic lithium solid electrolytes. Chemistry of Inorganic Materials, 2024, 4: 100078.

[3] Adrian Sazvar, Soroush Ghahramani, Omid Banapour Ghaffari, et al. Review of advances and challenges in Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes: From processing to performance. Journal of Power Sources, 2025, 657: 238150.

[4] Hongchao Sun, Shuaishuai Kang, Lei Cui, et al. Prospects of LLZO type solid electrolyte: From material design to battery application. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 454: 140375.

[5] Wuliang Feng, Yufeng Zhao, Yongyao Xia. Solid interfaces for the garnet electrolytes. Advanced Materials, 2024, 36(15): 2306111.

[6] Golap Kalita, Takashi Endo, Toshihiko Nishi. Recent development on low temperature synthesis of cubic-phase LLZO electrolyte particles for application in all-solid-state batteries. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2023, 969: 172282.

[7] Berhanu Degagsa Dandena, Dah-Shyang Tsai, She-Huang Wu, et al. Review of interface issues in Li–argyrodite-based solid-state Li–metal batteries. EES Batteries, 2025, 1(4): 692-743.

[8] Yassmine Jamouri, Dalitso Mwanza, Asmaa Akhrouf, et al. Unlocking the potential of Li-argyrodite solid-state electrolytes: A path toward enhanced Li-ion conduction and electrode-electrolyte compatibility for high-performance next-generation all-solid-state batteries. Nano Energy, 2025, 144: 111378.

[9] Jian-Cang Wang, Lu-Lu Zhao, Nan Zhang, et al. Interfacial stability between sulfide solid electrolytes and lithium anodes: Challenges, strategies and perspectives. Nano Energy, 2024, 123: 109361.

[10] Ziyu Song, Fangfang Chen, Maria Martinez-Ibañez, et al. A reflection on polymer electrolytes for solid-state lithium metal batteries. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(1): 4884.

[11] Jiajia Tan, Lingxiao Guo, Jinming Hu, et al. Recent advances in poly (ethylene oxide)-based solid-state electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2024, 128(41): 17197-17218.

[12] Weiran Zhang, Victor Koverga, Sufu Liu, et al. Single-phase local-high-concentration solid polymer electrolytes for lithium-metal batteries. Nature Energy, 2024, 9(4): 386-400.

[13] Qian Wu, Mandi Fang, Shizhe Jiao, et al. Phase regulation enabling dense polymer-based composite electrolytes for solid-state lithium metal batteries. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(1): 6306.

[14] Yu Xia, Xu Han, Yue Ji, et al. Solid-electrolyte interphases for all-solid-state batteries. ChemPhysMater, 2025, 4(1): 9-29.

[15] Xiaorong Zhang, Jinping He, Yuxue Sun, et al. Enhanced inorganic-organic interphase compatibility in composite solid electrolytes by forming isocyanate-linked hybrid cross-linked networks. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2025, 700: 138441.

Downloads

Published

28-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mu, Y. (2026). Challenges and Opportunities Facing Solid-State Electrolytes. International Journal of Energy, 10(2), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.54097/gj28me18