Achievement Goals and Motivation in Physical Education: A Correlational Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/jid.v5i2.07Keywords:
Achievement Goals, Motivation in Physical Education, A Correlational StudyAbstract
The majority of the respondents in this study are female. The results indicate a high presence of achievement goals in Physical Education, particularly in terms of Physical Competency, as evidenced by an overall mean score of 3.39. Additionally, the survey reveals a high implementation of the Benefits of Movement, with an overall mean rating of 3.39. Respondents also demonstrate a high level of motivation in Building a Community of Movement, reflected in a mean rating equivalent to 3.39. Furthermore, the results suggest that respondents are highly motivated to improve their physical competency in Physical Education, with an overall mean score of 3.37. The responses yield an overall mean of 3.38, indicating a high level of motivation for activities related to movement. the study findings show no significant difference in the level of motivation in Physical Education concerning Physical Competence, Benefits of Movement, and Building Community of Movements. The significance values (0.065, 0.420, and 0.345, respectively) are all greater than the predetermined significance level of 0.05. Data analysis also reveals that there is no significant difference in the assessment of motivation in Physical Education in terms of Physical Competence, Benefits of Movement, and Building Community, as indicated by the attained significance values of 0.619, 0.551, and 0.661, respectively.
Downloads
References
Brophy, J, Toward a Model of the Value Aspects of Motivation in Education. Educational Psychologist Journal, 2005,14,75-85.
Bouchard, C. Rankinen, T, ndividual Difference in Response to Physical Activity. Med Sci Sports Exercise. 2001;33 (6): S446-51.
Bandura, A, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman Press, 1997.
Boaler, J. and Dweck, C, Mathematical Mindsets: Unleashing Students’ Poetential. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass,2016.
Claxton, G, Learning and the Development of Resilience. Pollard (ed)London: Continuum,2002.
DeCharms, R, Personal Causation. New York: Academic Press,1968.
Diego, Andres, Motivational Profession in PE: Differences at the Psychosocial, Gender, Age and Extra Curricular Sports, 2013.
Dweck, C. Mindset: How You Can Fulfill Your Poetential. London: Robinson,2017.
Hargreaves, M, Exercise and Gene Expression. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl Sci. 2015; 133: 457-69.
Elliot. A.J, Conceptual History of Achievement Goal Construct. New York: Guilford,2005.
Hickey, D.T. and Granade, J.B, The Influence of Social-Cultural Theory on Theories of Motivation and Engagement. Greenwich, CT: Information Age,2004.
Hidi, S. and Baird, W, Strategies for Increasing Text-Based Interest and Students’ Recall of Expository Text. Reading Research Quarterly,1988,23, 465-483.
Linnerbrink-Garcia, l., Wormington, s.v., synder, k.e, Riggsbee, J., Ben-Eliyahu, Multiple Pathways to Success: An Eamination of Integrative Motivational Profiles. J. Educational Psychology, 2018.
Linnenbrink, E. A, The Dilemma of Performance-Approach Goals.Journal of Educational Psychology ,2005,7, 197-213.
Locke, E. and Latham, G, Building Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation. American Psychologist , 2002,67, 705-717.
Midgley C., Arunkumar, R., and Urdan, T, Goals. Journal of Educational Psychology ,2001,93, 77-86.
Steinmayr, R., and Amelang, M, First Results Regarding the Criterion Validity. I-S-T 2000R Diagnostica,2006,52, 181-188.
UNESCO QPE, Quality Physical Education Guidelines for Policy Makers, 2015.
Urdan, T, Can Achievement Goal Theory Guide School Reform?, 2004.
Fernández-Río, J., Sanz, N., Fernández-Cando, J., and Santos, L, Impact of a sustained cooperative learning intervention on student motivation. Phys. Educ. Sport Pedag. 22, 89–105. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2015.1123238.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
