Research on Intelligent Recognition Technology in Lithology Based on Multi-parameter Fusion of Logging While Drilling

Authors

  • Haibo Liang
  • Jiaguo Xiong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/0h7rhboa

Keywords:

Lithology Identification, Catboost, Bayesian Optimization, Kernel Principal Component Analysis

Abstract

In oil and gas drilling, timely and accurate identification of formation lithology is an important guarantee of drilling safety. Aiming at the problems of inaccurate identification of lithology in drilling by traditional methods, and low efficiency due to the fact that even modern instruments cannot respond to lithology in real time. the Categorical Boost (CatBoost) model was applied to lithology identification in this study. However, since CatBoost uses more hyperparameters in its modeling, it is difficult to optimize model prediction by manually tuning the parameters. Therefore, the introduction of Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA) extracts fewer and more important features from the original data, eliminates the redundant information contained therein, and combines with Bayesian Optimization (BO) algorithm to optimize the hyperparameters during the training process, thus improving the prediction performance of CatBoost. Two experiments were designed to verify the recognition ability of the model, and the final test results of the model showed that the KPCA-BO-CatBoost model proposed in this paper had the best overall performance, and the lithology recognition accuracy reached more than 90%. The model was effective in identifying the formation lithology, realized real-time lithology identification by combining the parameters of logging while drilling, improved the efficiency and accuracy of lithology identification, and was of great significance in guiding the subsequent drilling work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbey CP, Okpogo EU, Atueyi IO, Application of rock physics parameters for lithology and fluid prediction of ‘TN’ field of Niger Delta basin, Nigeria (Article) %J Egyptian Journal of Petroleum. Vol.27 (2018) No. 4, p. 853-866.

Agbadze OK, Qiang C, Jiaren Y, Acoustic impedance and lithology-based reservoir porosity analysis using predictive machine learning algorithms %J Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. Vol.208(2022).

Chongwain GC, Osinowo OO, Ntamak-Nida MJ, et al. Lithological typing, depositional environment, and reservoir quality characterization of the “M-Field,” offshore Douala Basin, Cameroon %J Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. Vol.9(2019) No.3, p. 1705-1721.

Errachdi A, Benrejeb M, Online identification using radial basis function neural network coupled with KPCA %J International Journal of General Systems. Vol.46(2017) No.1, p. 52-65.

Liang H, Chen H, Guo J, et al. Research on lithology identification method based on mechanical specific energy principle and machine learning theory. %J Expert Systems with Applications. Vol.189(2022).

Okeugo CG, Onuoha KM, Ekwe AC. Lithology and fluid discrimination using rock physics-based modified upper Hashin–Shtrikman bound: an example from onshore Niger Delta Basin %J Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production. Vol.11 (2021) No.2, p. 569-578.

Middlebrook ML, Aud WW, Harkrider JD. An Evolving Approach in the Analysis of Stress-Test Pressure-Decline Data %J SPE Production & Facilities. Vol.12(1997) No.3, p. 187-194.

Sun J, Li Q, Chen M, Ren L, et al. Optimization of models for a rapid identification of lithology while drilling - A win-win strategy based on machine learning. %J Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering. Vol.14 (2019) No.17, p.321-341.

Yang R, Wang P, Qi J. A novel SSA-CatBoost machine learning model for credit rating. %J Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. Vol.44 (2022) No.2, p. 1-16.

Zhang X, Sun Q, He K, et al. Lithology identification of logging data based on improved neighborhood rough set and AdaBoost %J Earth Science Informatics. Vol.15(2022) No.2, p. 1201-1213.

Zhu X, Zhang H, Ren Q, et al. A Tri-Training method for lithofacies identification under scarce labeled logging data %J Earth Science Informatics. Vol.16(2021) No.2, p.1-13.

Zhao Z, Du J, Zou C, et al. Geological exploration theory for large oil and gas provinces and its significance %J Petroleum Exploration and Development. Vol.38 (2011) No.5, p.513-522.

Zou Y, Chen Y, Deng H. Gradient Boosting Decision Tree for Lithology Identification with Well Logs: A Case Study of Zhaoxian Gold Deposit, Shandong Peninsula, China %J Natural Resources Research. Vol.30(2021) No.5, p.3197-3217.

Saporetti CM, Goliatt L, Pereira E. Neural network boosted with differential evolution for lithology identification based on well logs information %J Earth Science Informatics. Vol.14 (2021) No.1, p. 133-140.

Gu Y, Zhang D, Bao Z. Lithology identification in tight sandstone reservoirs using CRBM-PSO-XGBoost; %J Oil and Gas Geology. Vol.42 (2021) No.5, p. 1210-1222.

Santos DTd, Roisenberg M, Nascimento MdS. Deep Recurrent Neural Networks Approach to Sedimentary Facies Classification Using Well Logs %J IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters. Vol.19 (2022) No.3, p.1-5.

Simmini F, Rampazzo M, Peterle F, et al. A Self-Tuning KPCA-Based Approach to Fault Detection in Chiller Systems %J IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. Vol.30 (2022) No.4, p. 1359-1374.

Sun J, Li Q, Chen M, et al. Optimization of models for a rapid identification of lithology while drilling - A win-win strategy based on machine learning. %J Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering. Vol.17 (2019) No6, p. 321-341.

Downloads

Published

20-12-2023

Issue

Section

Articles