Construction and Optimization Strategies for an Online Teaching Platform for College Students' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education

Lin Wu; Liu Yang; Chunyan Zhang

doi:10.54097/chdjky04

Authors

Lin Wu
Liu Yang
Chunyan Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/chdjky04

Keywords:

Higher Education, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Online Platform.

Abstract

With the advent of a new era, college student entrepreneurship education has garnered significant attention from universities and society at large. The aid of information technology brings new opportunities for the smooth execution of this work. Traditional education modes, affected by objective factors, have clear drawbacks. To enhance contemporary students' innovative abilities and core competitiveness, it is necessary to build a comprehensive online teaching platform for entrepreneurship education based on actual development conditions. This platform can leverage the advantages of the internet and information technology to accurately analyze students' learning abilities and needs, providing them with personalized educational resources. Moreover, incorporating virtual laboratories and simulated entrepreneurship into practical teaching can effectively cultivate students' problem-solving abilities, fostering the development of entrepreneurship education in universities and nurturing more well-rounded talents for society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Alfoudari A. M., Durugbo C. M., Aldhmour F. M. Understanding socio-technological challenges of smart classrooms using a systematic review. Computers and Education. 2021;173(85):104282–104367. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104282.

[2] Aguilar J., Sánchez M., Cordero J. Learning analytics tasks as services in smart classrooms. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2017;(47):4562–5386.

[3] Lampoltshammer T. J., Albrecht V., Raith C. Teaching digital sustainability in higher education from a transdisciplinary perspective. Sustainability. 2021;13(42):473–587.

[4] Hou Z. K., Cheng H. L., Sun S. W., Chen J., Qi D. Q., Liu Z. B. Crack propagation and hydraulic fracturing in different lithologies. Applied Geophysics. 2019;16(2):243–251. doi: 10.1007/s11770-019-0764-3.

[5] Wolff C. E., Jarodzka H., Boshuizen H. Classroom management scripts: a theoretical model contrasting expert and novice teachers’ knowledge and awareness of classroom events. Educational Psychology Review. 2020;2020(5):473–327.

[6] Cheng H., Wei J., Cheng Z. Study on sedimentary facies and reservoir characteristics of Paleogene sandstone in Yingmaili block. Tarim basin Geofluids. 2022;2022:p. 2321.

[7] Li X., Song J., Huang B. A scientific workflow management system architecture and its scheduling based on cloud service platform for manufacturing big data analytics. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2016; 84(1-4): 119–131. doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7804-9.

[8] Campo D., Cristina C.-M. Useful interactive teaching tool for learning: clickers in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments. 2016;234(4):346–434.

[9] Baturay M. H., Bay O. F. The effects of problem-based learning on the classroom community perceptions and achievement of web-based education students. Computers and Education. 2010;55(1):43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.001.

[10] Han J., Cheng H., Shi Y., Wang L., Song Y., Zhnag W. Connectivity analysis and application of fracture cave carbonate reservoir in Tazhong. Science Technology and Engineering. 2016;16(5):147–152.

[11] Zhang J., Wenjun L. I. Cloud media platform applied to explore the advantages of broad-spectrum innovation and entrepreneurship education. Journal of Higher Education. 2018;42(00):43–682.

[12] Cheng H., Ma P., Dong G., Zhang S., Wei J., Qin Q. Characteristics of carboniferous volcanic reservoirs in beisantai oilfield, junggar basin. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2022;2022:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2022/7800630.

[13] Goos M., Salomons A. Measuring teaching quality in higher education: assessing selection bias in course evaluations. Research in Higher Education. 2017;37(837):724–547.

[14] Macleod J., Yang H. H., Zhu S., Li Y. Understanding students’ preferences toward the smart classroom learning environment: development and validation of an instrument. Computers and Education. 2018; 122(8):80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu. 2018.03.015.

[15] Hochweber J., Hosenfeld I., Klieme E. Classroom composition, classroom management, and the relationship between student attributes and grades. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2014;106(1):289–300.