The Ideological Perversion of Technological Progress: A Philosophical Reflection on Informal Employment

Yunyi Li; Canni Lin

doi:10.54097/kv1z1g46

Authors

Yunyi Li
Canni Lin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/kv1z1g46

Keywords:

Informal Employment; Ideology Perversion; Digital Platforms; Žižek’s Philosophy.

Abstract

This paper examines the ideological distortion brought about by technological progress, focusing on its impact on informal employment through the lens of Slavoj Žižek’s theory of perversion. As digital platforms like Upwork and Fiverr grow, providing flexible jobs for millions of freelancers, the number of informal workers has increased worldwide. While such platforms claim to provide flexibility and autonomy, informal workers confront significant challenges, including low wages, lack of social security, and job instability. This study explores how technological progress, under the guise of legitimacy and rationality, reshapes society's perception of remote outsourced work, using Žižek’s framework to uncover the hidden mechanisms of exploitation and control. Moreover, the analysis reveals that, although platforms promote innovation and efficiency, they strengthen workers’dependency through algorithmic surveillance, exacerbating exploitation. Furthermore, the paper calls for a critical reassessment of the societal and economic impacts of technological advancements on informal workers and advocates for improved working conditions and stronger social protections.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] ILO (International Labour Organization). (2018). Women and men in the informal economy: A statistical picture. Third edition.

[2] Kalleberg, A. L. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s-2000s. Russell Sage Foundation.

[3] Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class (p. 208). Bloomsbury academic.

[4] Zizek, S. (2019). The sublime object of ideology. Verso Books.

[5] Chen, M. A. (2012). The informal economy: Definitions, theories and policies.

[6] Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of economic perspectives, 29(3), 3-30.

[7] Sundararajan A. The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. MIT press; 2017 Apr 21.

[8] Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in science and technology, 32(3), 61.

[9] Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American journal of sociology, 87(3), 548-577.

[10] Berg, J. (2016). Income Securiti in the on-demand economy: findings and Policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers. Comparative labor law and policy journal, 37(3), 506-543.

[11] Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class (p. 208). Bloomsbury academic.

[12] De Stefano, V. M. (2016). The rise of the ‘just-in-time workforce’: on-demand work, crowd work and labour protection in the ‘gig-economy’. Comparative labor law and policy journal, 37(3), 471-504.

[13] Scholz, T. (2017). Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. John Wiley & Sons.

[14] Lacan, J. (2001). Ecrits: A selection. Routledge.

[15] Žižek, S. (2013). Enjoy your symptom!: Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and out. routledge.

[16] Zizek, S. (2019). The sublime object of ideology. Verso Books.

[17] Rogers, B. (2015). The social costs of Uber. U. Chi. L. Rev. Dialogue, 82, 85.

[18] Mateescu, A., & Nguyen, A. (2019). Explainer. Algorithmic management in the workplace, Data & Society, 6, 1-15.

[19] Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, employment and society, 33(1), 56-75.

[20] Lee, M. K., Kusbit, D., Metsky, E., & Dabbish, L. (2015, April). Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1603-1612).

[21] Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International journal of communication, 10, 27.

[22] Zizek, S. (2020). The plague of fantasies. Verso Books.

[23] Lazzarato, M. (2011). the Indebted Man.

[24] Zizek, S. (2019). The sublime object of ideology. Verso Books.

[25] Feenberg, A. (2010). Between reason and experience: Essays in technology and modernity. Mit Press.

[26] Zizek, S. (1992). Looking awry: An introduction to Jacques Lacan through popular culture. MIT press.

[27] Zizek, S. (1993). Tarrying with the negative: Kant, Hegel, and the critique of ideology. Duke University Press.