Green Finance and ESG Investment Return Analysis: Evidence from CSI 300 Constituent Stocks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ka5qvy05Keywords:
Green Finances; ESG Investment; Investment Retrurn; CSI 300, Ningde Times.Abstract
Against the backdrop of global efforts toward carbon neutrality, the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and China’s dual-carbon targets-peaking carbon emissions by 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2060-have accelerated enterprises’ ESG transformation. This study investigates the relationship between ESG performance and investment returns in China’s green finance market, using CSI 300 constituent stocks from 2020 to 2024 as the research sample. Based on Bloomberg ESG ratings and stock price data, the samples are divided into high-ESG and low-ESG portfolios. The analysis calculates key indicators such as annualized return and volatility, and employs regression analysis to test for the existence of an ESG premium. In addition, Ningde Times is examined as a case study to illustrate how ESG optimization influences corporate financing costs. The findings reveal three key results. First, the average ESG rating of CSI 300 constituent stocks increased year by year during 2020-2024, reflecting enterprises’ growing emphasis on ESG practices. Second, the high-ESG portfolio outperformed the low-ESG portfolio, with annualized returns higher by 3.2%-5.1% and volatility lower by 1.8%-2.5%, indicating a significant ESG premium. Third, Ningde Times’ ESG initiatives, including battery recycling and enhanced employee welfare, lowered its financing interest rate by approximately 1.2 percentage points compared with the industry average. This study provides empirical evidence for investors seeking to construct ESG-oriented portfolios and offers policy implications for strengthening green finance support mechanisms.
Downloads
References
[1] European Commission. Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) - Factsheet. Brussels: European Commission, 2023.
[2] Friede G, Busch T, Bassen A. ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More Than 2000 Empirical Studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 2015, 5(4): 210-233.
[3] Ningde Times New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. ESG Report 2024. Fuzhou: Ningde Times, 2024.
[4] Li J, Wang H. ESG and Stock Returns: Evidence from China’s New Energy Sector. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, (8): 121-138.
[5] Green Finance Committee of China Society for Finance and Banking. Green Finance Development Report (2024). Beijing: China Financial Publishing House, 2024.
[6] China Securities Index Co., Ltd. CSI ESG Rating Methodology. Shanghai: China Securities Index Co., Ltd., 2022.
[7] United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Report 2024. New York: United Nations, 2024.
[8] Freeman R E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing, 1984.
[9] Yao Y, Zhu W. Current Situation and Countermeasures of Green Finance Sustainable Development under the ESG Framework. China Business & Trade, 2025, 34(14): 143-146.
[10] Sharpe W F. The Sharpe Ratio. Journal of Portfolio Management, 1994, 21(1): 49-58.
[11] China Securities Regulatory Commission. A-Share Listed Companies ESG Information Disclosure Status Report (2024). Beijing: CSRC, 2024.
[12] Amjady N. ESG Investment Performance in Global Stock Markets: Evidence from Post-COVID Period. Energy Economics, 2021, 99: 105387.
[13] MSCI. MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology. New York: MSCI Inc., 2024.
[14] FTSE Russell. FTSE4Good Index Series Methodology. London: FTSE Russell, 2023.
[15] China Securities Association. Survey Report on Chinese Individual Investors’ Investment Behavior (2024). Beijing: China Securities Association, 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

