Research on the Association between ESG Disclosure and Corporate Financial Performance: Based on Data from Hong Kong Listed Companies

Authors

  • Haoren Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/d99vrz34

Keywords:

ESG Disclosure, Corporate Financial Performance, Hong Kong Listed Companies.

Abstract

Propelled by the global movement toward sustainable development, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure has transitioned from being a voluntary initiative to becoming a central indicator for evaluating a firm’s non-financial performance. Nowadays, whether it is investors with capital or regulatory authorities in charge of the market, they are all pressuring enterprises to clarify their ESG performance—either by including it in the annual report or by issuing a separate sustainability report. Transparency has become a mandatory requirement. However, whether in academic research papers or industry practice observations, there has been no consensus reached on whether ESG disclosure can truly enhance corporate financial performance. On one side, empirical evidence supports a positive link: high-quality ESG disclosure is found to help enterprises build a strong reputation, reduce capital costs during financing, and thereby boost financial performance. On the other side, contrasting views exist: ESG-related investments may increase firms’ short-term cost burdens, which in turn places pressure on financial returns. Hong Kong is an international financial center, and its listed companies are in a rather unique position: they have to be scrutinized under a “magnifying glass” by global investors while also strictly adhering to local regulatory rules. This kind of enterprise practice under dual constraints precisely provides a unique research sample for exploring the intrinsic connection between corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure behavior and financial performance levels. This research project is based on the data of Hong Kong-listed companies from 2015 to 2023, aiming to deeply explore the correlation between environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and financial performance of enterprises, while comparing the differentiated impacts across environmental, social, and governance dimensions. These findings are expected to offer practical insights of value to businesses and regulatory authorities, providing assistance for their decision-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Friede G, Busch T, Bassen A. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies [J]. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 2015, 5 (4): 210 - 233.

[2] Li Q, Lau W Y, Ng K H. Impact of ESG on Chinese-Listed Companies: From a New Perspective of Firm Value [J]. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 2025: 1 - 23.

[3] Choy L Y. Hong Kong’s changing regulatory approaches to corporate environmental, social, and governance (‘ESG’) disclosure: an evidence-based assessment [J]. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 2024, 24 (1): 137 - 167.

[4] Cheng B, Ioannou I, Serafeim G. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance [J]. Strategic management journal, 2014, 35 (1): 1 - 23.

[5] Brammer S, Brooks C, Pavelin S. Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures [J]. Financial management, 2006, 35 (3): 97 - 116.

[6] Chung R, Bayne L, Birt J. The impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure on firm financial performance: evidence from Hong Kong [J]. Asian Review of Accounting, 2024, 32 (1): 136 - 165.

[7] Kots Antonis S, Pinney C, Serafeim G. ESG integration in investment management: Myths and realities [J]. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2016, 28 (2): 10 - 16.

[8] Dhaliwal D S, Li O Z, Tsang A, et al. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting [J]. The accounting review, 2011, 86 (1): 59 - 100.

[9] Shobhwani K, Lodha S. Impact of ESG disclosure scores on financial, operating and market-based performance: Evidence from NSE-100 companies [J]. NMIMS Management Review, 2024, 32 (3): 211 - 223.

[10] Margolis J D, Walsh J P. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business [J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2003, 48 (2): 268 - 305.

[11] Friede G, Busch T, Bassen A. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies [J]. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 2015, 5 (4): 210 - 233.

[12] Jensen M C, Meckling W H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure [M]//Corporate governance. Gower, 2019: 77 - 132.

[13] Freeman R E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach [M]. Cambridge university press, 2010.

[14] Spence M. Job market signaling [M]//Uncertainty in economics. Academic Press, 1978: 281 - 306.

Downloads

Published

09-02-2026

Issue

Section

Articles