Artificial Intelligence Innovates in Healthcare and Balances Risks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/stxgaq53Keywords:
Artificial intelligence; healthcare; algorithmic bias; ethical governance; international standardsAbstract
Artificial intelligence is profoundly reshaping the global healthcare landscape. From cancer screening to clinical documentation, from drug discovery to public health forecasting, artificial intelligence demonstrates remarkable potential to enhance efficiency, improve diagnostic accuracy, and expand accessibility. It also significantly reduces physicians’ administrative burden through automated documentation while advancing telemedicine and equitable healthcare delivery. However, issues such as data privacy breaches, algorithmic bias, limited interpretability of models, erosion of clinical skills, and unclear accountability have raised serious concerns. This paper adopts the framework of “value–risk–governance” to review the applications, challenges, and governance strategies of artificial intelligence in global healthcare. It first summarises the evidence of artificial intelligence’s value in medical imaging, personalised treatment, drug discovery, public health prediction, and telemedicine. It then analyses challenges including privacy and security, algorithmic bias, responsibility allocation, ethical dilemmas, and cross-border governance. Finally, it highlights the importance of interdisciplinary integration, international cooperation, and sustainability. It argues that the future of healthcare artificial intelligence must be built on principles of human-centricity, trustworthiness, and equity in order to achieve global health for all.
Downloads
References
[1] Eisemann N, Bunk S, Mukama T, Baltus H, Elsner S A, Gomille T, et al. Nationwide real-world implementation of AI for cancer detection in population-based mammography screening. Nature Medicine, 2025, 31: 917-924.
[2] Duggan M J, Gervase J, Schoenbaum A, et al. Clinician experiences with ambient scribe technology to assist with documentation burden and efficiency. JAMA Network Open, 2025, 8(2): e2460637.
[3] Mount Sinai Health System. Bias in generative AI clinical recommendations. Nature Medicine, 2025.
[4] Tursi A, Mocci G, Satta P U, et al. Impact of a symbiotic mixture on moderate-to-severe diverticular disease of the colon. Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials, 2025, 20(1): 9.
[5] World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of AI for health: guidance on large multi-modal models. Geneva: WHO, 2024.
[6] Chapelin J, Voisin A, Rose B, et al. Data-driven drift detection and diagnosis framework for predictive maintenance of heterogeneous production processes: Application to a multiple tapping process. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 139.
[7] Khan U S, Khan S U R. Ethics by design: a lifecycle framework for trustworthy AI in medical imaging from transparent data governance to clinically validated deployment. 2025.
[8] Tsalidis A, Bharadwaj L, Shen F X. Standardization and accuracy of race and ethnicity data: Equity implications for medical AI. PLoS Digital Health, 2025, 4(5).
[9] Mhra. Software and AI as a medical device: change programme. London: MHRA, 2025.
[10] M. J P. Collaborative AI: Artificial Intelligence, Expertise, and Pedagogy in English Language Teaching. University of Toronto Press, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

