The Influence of ESG Fund Capital Flows on Corporate Financing Behaviour: A Comparative Examination of Active and Passive Investment Strategies in the Hong Kong Market

Authors

  • Hanyi Hong Ningbo Xiaoshi High School, Zhejiang, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/9w0rrk92

Keywords:

ESG Investment, Corporate Financing, Cost of Capital, Sustainable Finance, Shareholder Engagement, Hong Kong Financial Market.

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of how capital flows from funds incorporating Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria affect the financing decisions of corporations listed in Hong Kong. The research design employs a robust multi-method empirical strategy to dissect the distinct mechanistic pathways through which actively managed and passively managed ESG funds exert their influence. Key findings reveal that active ESG fund ownership is associated with a substantial reduction in the average cost of debt for firms (approximately twenty-eight basis points), primarily facilitated through direct engagement and governance improvements. Passively managed ESG funds also demonstrate a significant effect, leading to a fifteen basis point decrease in borrowing costs, largely mediated by market signaling and liquidity enhancement mechanisms, with these impacts typically observed within a six-month window following portfolio adjustments. Furthermore, the environmental and governance dimensions of ESG emerge as the most potent factors, correlating with an approximate five percent increase in the issuance of green bonds as a proportion of total debt. This study contributes fresh empirical evidence on the financial materiality of sustainable investing within the unique context of an advanced emerging market and offers actionable implications for corporate financial strategy and regulatory policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Global Sustainable Investment Alliance (GSIA). Global sustainable investment review finds US$30 trillion invested in sustainable assets. 2023. Available: https://www.gsi-alliance.org/global-sustainable-investment-review-finds-us30-trillion-invested-in-sustainable-assets/

[2] Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). Year in review 2024-25. 2025. Available: https://www.sfc.hk/-/media/TC/files/COM/Annual-Report/2024-25/08_Year-in-Review_TC.pdf?rev=008d4697561343ca8a8665d24c203ce7&hash=6E9389B4D8238396974E450AF6FCF16C

[3] Zhang J, Nedospasova O P. ESG disclosure standards: International and Chinese case studies. Siberian Financial School, 2024, 1: 116-122.

[4] Eccles R G, Ioannou I, Serafeim G. The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 2014, 60(11): 2835-2857.

[5] Dyck A, Lins K V, Roth L, Wagner H F. Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 2019, 131(3): 693-714.

[6] Bauer R, Ruof T, Smeets P. Get real! Individuals prefer more sustainable investments. The Review of Financial Studies, 2021, 34(8): 3976-4043.

[7] Gibson R, Krueger P, Schmidt P S. ESG rating disagreement and stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 2021, 77(4): 104-127.

[8] Tian L. The Role of ESG Disclosure in Reducing Debt Financing Costs for Chinese Corporations. Journal of Electrical Systems, 2024, 20(10s).

[9] Freeman R E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press, 2015.

[10] Spence M. Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1973, 87(3): 355-374.

[11] Fatemi A, Glaum M, Kaiser S. ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 2018, 38: 45-64.

[12] Zhang W, Zhang Y, Mou S. Green finance development on corporate sustainability: Evidence from china. Finance Research Letters, 2025, 99: 107468.

[13] Zhou J, Lei X, Yu J. ESG rating divergence and corporate green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2024, 33(4): 2911-2930.

[14] Chi W, Chen Y. Employee satisfaction and the cost of corporate borrowing. Finance Research Letters, 2021, 40: 101666.

[15] He F, Du H, Yu B. Corporate ESG performance and manager misconduct: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2022, 82: 102201.

Downloads

Published

13-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hong, H. (2026). The Influence of ESG Fund Capital Flows on Corporate Financing Behaviour: A Comparative Examination of Active and Passive Investment Strategies in the Hong Kong Market. Journal of Innovation and Development, 14(3), 487-495. https://doi.org/10.54097/9w0rrk92