Literature Review of Enterprise Digital Transformation and Green Supply Chain

Yuehan Gao

doi:10.54097/pxsps817

Authors

Yuehan Gao School of business, MACAU UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Macao, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/pxsps817

Keywords:

Digital transformation, green supply chain, Technology.

Abstract

Amid the challenges of global climate change and resource scarcity, the Chinese government continues to promote green development in pursuit of carbon neutrality. Enterprises are under increasing pressure to undertake green transformation, with digital transformation emerging as a key enabler of this process. This paper examines the connotations, development stages, measurement methods, theoretical foundations, and manifestations of digital transformation systematically. It also explores the mechanisms by which it influences green supply chains. By analyzing the literature on digital transformation and green supply chains from 2010 to 2025 and integrating resource-based theory with dynamic capabilities theory, this paper constructs an integrated framework for how digital transformation impacts green supply chains. The paper finds that digital transformation can effectively improve the efficiency, operational transparency, and innovation capabilities of green supply chains by optimizing resource allocation, alleviating financing constraints, and enhancing operational transparency and innovation. While measurement methods for digital transformation provide important tools for assessing its maturity, existing research remains limited in terms of indicator system construction and cross-context applicability. This paper provides room for further research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Lam P, Häbler J, Bachinger M, Franz M, Voss M, Weischer L. Strategic engagement on Chinese initiatives for green supply chains: An overview of Chinese approaches with recommendations for stakeholders in policy making, diplomacy and advocacy, 2024.

[2] Fan W, Wu X, He Q. Digitalization drives green transformation of supply chains: A two-stage evolutionary game analysis, Annals of Operations Research Preprint, 2024.

[3] Fitzgerald M, Kruschwitz N, Bonnet D, Welch M. Embracing digital technology: a new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2014, 55 (2): 1 - 12.

[4] Bröring, L. P. J. Mapping the digital journey: A tool for measuring digital transformation progress. 2025.

[5] Vaska S, Massaro M, Bagarotto E M, Dal Mas F. The digital transformation of business model innovation: a structured literature review. Front. Psychol. 2021, 11.

[6] Song F. The effects of digital transformation on corporate energy efficiency: A supply chain spillover perspective. Frontiers in Sustainability, 2025, 6.

[7] Li B, Xu C, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Zhou Q, Xing X. Digital transformation, supply chain collaboration, and enterprise growth: Theoretical logic and Chinese practice. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 2024, 30 (1).

[8] Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019, 28 (2), 118 – 144.

[9] Aw E.C.-X. et al. Adapt or die! embrace digital transformation for better firm performance: A Causal recipe, Internet Research, 2025, 1 – 21.

[10] Li Y, Xie H, Liu C. Research on synergy measurement and digital finance driving mechanism of enterprise digital transformation and greening upgrade: an empirical analysis based on the complex system coordination degree model. Sustainability, 2025, 17 (11), 4886.

[11] Chanias S, Hess T. Understanding digital transformation strategy formation: Insights from Europe’s automotive industry. 2016.

[12] Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C. Research commentary: digital infrastructures: the missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21 (4): 748 – 759.

[13] Di Wang, Xuefeng Shao, Research on the impact of digital transformation on the production efficiency of manufacturing enterprises: Institution-based analysis of the threshold effect, International Review of Economics & Finance, 2024, 91: 883 - 897.

[14] Xu M, Zhang Y, Sun H, Tang Y, Li J. How digital transformation enhances corporate innovation performance: The mediating roles of big data capabilities and organizational agility, Heliyon, 2024, 10 (14): 2405 - 8440.

[15] Shan H. Y. Digital innovation, dynamic capabilities and enterprise innovation performance. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 2023, 13: 1005 - 1023.

[16] Xingye J, Congjiang Z, Mingyue F, Tao L, Huihua N. Measurement problem of enterprise digital transformation: New methods and findings based on large language models. China Economist, 2025, 20 (02): 70 – 95.

[17] Ahmad A, Alshurideh M, Al Kurdi B, Aburayya A, Hamadneh S. Digital transformation metrics: a conceptual view. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 2021, 24 (7), 1 - 18.

[18] Sascha Kraus, Susanne Durst, João J. Ferreira, Pedro Veiga, Norbert Kailer, Alexandra Weinmann. Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo, International Journal of Information Management, 2022, 63.

[19] Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5 (2), 171 – 180.

[20] Grant R.M. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage. California Management Review, 1991, 33: 114 - 135.

[21] Ning L, Yao D. The impact of digital transformation on supply chain capabilities and supply chain competitive performance. Sustainability, 2023, 15 (13), 10107.

[22] Porter M. E. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press, 1990.

[23] Jean Tirol. "The theory of industrial organization.", MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, 1988.

[24] Teece D. J, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18 (7), 509 – 533.

[25] Winter S. G. Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24 (10), 991 – 995.

[26] Lawrence P. R, Lorsch J.W. Organization and environment: managing differentiation and integration. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, 1967.

[27] Fiedler F. E. A contingency model of leadership effectiveness, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1964, 149 – 190.

[28] Liao F. et al. Digital transformation and corporate green supply chain efficiency: Evidence from China’ Economic Analysis and Policy, 2024, 81: 195 – 207.

[29] Seyedghorban Z, Tahernejad H, Meriton R, Graham G. Supply chain digitalization: past, present and future, Production Planning & Control, 2019, 31 (2 – 3): 96 – 114.

[30] Plekhanov D, Franke H, Netland T. H. Digital transformation: a review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 2023, 41 (6): 821 – 844.

[31] Xing C, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Zhang L. From green-washing to innovation-washing: environmental information intangibility and corporate green innovation in China, International Review of Economics & Finance, 2024, 93: 204 - 226.

[32] Wiredu J, Yang Q, Kwasi Smpene A, Akwasi Gyamfi B, Asongu Simplice A. The effect of green supply chain management practices on corporate environmental performance: does supply chain competitive advantage matter, Business Strategy and the Environment, 2023, 33 (3), 2578 – 2599.

[33] Mugoni, E., Kanyepe, J. and Tukuta, M. Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices (SSCMPS) and environmental performance: A systematic review, Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 2024, 3 (1), 100050.

[34] Feng J, Yu C, Xufeng W. Untying the nexus between environmental information disclosure, green finance, and green technological innovation: A multi-analytical (SEM-ann) approach, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2024, 12.

[35] Jiao Y, Cui X, Wang J. Research on the antecedent configuration and performance of corporate environmental information disclosure. Chinese Journal Management, 2025, 1 - 10.

[36] Shi F, Wang C, Qin Z. An evolutionary game model for green production decisions of supply chain enterprises considering supply chain break risk. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2025.

[37] Gao Y, Leng Y, Shan B. Control supply chain risks in digital transformation: A new way to improve supply chain resilience. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 2022, 34 (7), 1 - 18.

[38] Qian C, Gao Y, Chen L. Green supply chain circular economy evaluation system based on industrial Internet of Things and blockchain technology under ESG concept. Processes, 2023, 11 (7).

[39] Liu Y, Li S, Yu C, Lv M. Research on green supply chain finance risk identification based on two-stage deep learning. Operations Research Perspectives, 2024, 13.

[40] Yaqub M.Z, Alsabban A. Industry-4.0-Enabled digital transformation: prospects, instruments, challenges, and implications for business strategies. Sustainability 2023, 15.

[41] Li Y, Zhang Y, Geng L. Digital finance, financing constraints and supply chain resilience, international review of economics & Finance, 2024, 96.

[42] Emtehani F, Nahavandi N. Rafiei F.M. Trade credit financing for supply chain coordination under financial challenges: a multi-leader–follower game approach. Financ Innov, 2023, 9 (6).

[43] Liu J, Wang H, Zhang J. The impact of supply chain finance on financial constraints of small and medium-sized enterprises and the moderating factors. Applied Economics, 2024, 1 – 12.

[44] von Berlepsch D, Lemke F. Gorton M. The importance of corporate reputation for sustainable supply chains: a systematic literature review, bibliometric mapping, and research agenda. J Bus Ethics, 2024, 189 (1), 9 – 34.

[45] Mateska I, Wagner S.M, Stienen L. Media reporting of environmental supply chain sustainability risks: contextual and moderating Ffctors. J Bus Ethics, 2025, 199 (1), 285 – 308.

[46] Marculetiu A, Ataseven C, Mackelprang, A.W. A review of how pressures and their sources drive Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices, Journal of Business Logistics, 2023, 44 (2): 257 – 288.