The Impact of Red Culture on Corporate Green Innovation: The Moderating Role of the Degree of Marketization and the Level of Clean Politics

Authors

  • Qin Zhang
  • Chuan Hu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/f32raa20

Keywords:

Red culture, Degree of marketization, Clean politics, Corporate green innovation, Informal institutions.

Abstract

This study analyzed 29,630 A-share listed companies from China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges between 2010 and 2021, using data from 20 national 5A red scenic spots. The OLS regression revealed that a strong red cultural atmosphere and a culture-cognition orientation significantly foster corporate green innovation. However, in areas with a high degree of marketization, improvements in formal systems weaken the positive impact of the red culture. Conversely, in regions with high levels of clean politics, red culture functions as an implicit contract thus enhancing the effectiveness of formal systems in promoting corporate green innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] North DC. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

[2] Greif A. Cultural beliefs and the organization of society: a historical and theoretical reflection on collectivist and individualist societies. Journal of Political Economy. 1994;102(5):912-50.

[3] Weber M, Kalberg S. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Routledge; 2013.

[4] Wang S, Wu R, Gao X, Li X. Governance participation of party organization and green behavior of private enterprises. Business and Management Journal. 2019;41(8):40-57.

[5] Tang L, Lu JN, Xue JY. Internal control, degree of marketization and enterprise environmental protection investment. Journal of Chongqing Gongshang University (Social Science Edition). 2023;(1):132-43.

[6] Bai FP, Huang YJ, Wang J, Shang MT. Entering the room of Zhilan: corporate green culture and green innovation. Foreign Economics and Management. 2024:1-16.

[7] Abramson PR. Culture matters: how values shape human progress. Contemporary Sociology. 2001;30(6):627-8.

[8] Coccia M. Socio-cultural origins of the patterns of technological innovation: what is the likely interaction among religious culture, religious plurality and innovation? Technology in Society. 2014; 36: 13-25.

[9] Cao K, Jiang W, Jin L, Zhu Y. Does Confucian culture reduce firms' pollution emissions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2024;31(3):1838-52.

[10] Zhu J, Grigoriadis TN. Chinese dialects, culture and economic performance. China Economic Review. 2022; 73: 101783.

[11] Zhao QF, Zhao WZ, Lu D, Zhao QW. Gaming and corporate innovation: a study based on cultural perspectives. Finance and Trade Economics. 2018;(9):122-40.

[12] Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1982. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520907393

[13] Yang HX. Exploring the dilemma of internalization of red culture and countermeasures. Research on Ideological and Political Education. 2020;(4):129-33.

[14] Xu XX, Long ZN, Li WL. Confucian culture and corporate charitable giving. Foreign Economics and Management. 2020;(2):124-36.

[15] Hofstede G. Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management and Organization. 1980;10(4):15-41.

[16] DiMaggio P. Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology. 1997;23(1):263-87.

[17] Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A. Cultural theory. Boulder (CO): Westview Press; 1990.

[18] Ottaviano GI, Peri G. The economic value of cultural diversity: evidence from US cities. Journal of Economic Geography. 2006;6(1):9-44.

[19] Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L. The value of corporate culture. Journal of Financial Economics. 2015;117(1):60-76.

[20] Xu W, Lan W. Enterprise performance gap and green innovation: a contingency thought on decision convention of “poor performance leads to change”. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. 2020;22(1):18-33.

[21] Song WH, Yu HY. Green innovation strategy and green innovation: the roles of green creativity and green organizational identity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2018;25(2):135-50.

[22] Gu HB. Recent estimates and forecasts of the degree of marketization of the Chinese economy. Management World. 1997;(2):52-5.

[23] Jiang XW, Song HX. Exploring the degree of market economy in China. Management World. 1995;(6):33-7.

[24] Wang XL, Fan G, Hu LP. Marketization index of China’s provinces: NERI report 2018. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press; 2019.

[25] Fu C, Luo D, Zhang J, Li W. Tax incentives, marketization level, and corporate digital transformation. International Review of Economics and Finance. 2025; 97: 103777.

[26] Fan G, Wang XL, Ma GR. The contribution of China's marketization process to economic growth. Economic Research. 2011;(9):4-16.

[27] Xu LL, Yang Z, Liu F. Identification of high-tech enterprises, tax incentives and companies' technology innovation: the moderating role of marketization level. Management Review. 2021;33(2):130-40.

[28] Shen YC, Zhang XX, Xie HJ. Factor marketization, technological progress bias and regional innovation efficiency. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Social Science Edition). 2023;(5):145-54.

[29] Lin YS, Guo ZX, Wu QS. Performance assessment of market-oriented reforms in China. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Science Edition). 2019;(1):147-57.

[30] Yan DY. Innovative evaluation instrument on marketization and evaluation for China's regional characteristics of marketization (2000–2005). Finance and Economics Research. 2007;(8):41-50.

[31] Zhang QZ, Liu YW, Hu JY. Marketization process, risk preference attributes and firm innovation efficiency. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition). 2024;(2):104-16.

[32] Drogendijk R, Holm U. Cultural distance or cultural positions? Analysing the effect of culture on the HQ–subsidiary relationship. International Business Review. 2012;21(3):383-96.

[33] Buckley PJ, Clegg LJ, Cross AR, Liu X, Voss H, Zheng P. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. In: International business strategy. New York: Routledge; 2015. p. 574-600.

[34] Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WG. Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management. 2004;30(6):749-78.

[35] Nadkarni S, Barr PS. Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: an integrated view. Strategic Management Journal. 2008;29(13):1395-427.

[36] Li Y, Pickles A, Savage M. Social capital and social trust in Britain. European Sociological Review. 2005;21(2):109-23.

[37] Zhang QZ, Liu YW, Hu JY. Marketization process, risk preference attributes and firm innovation efficiency. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition). 2024;(2):104-16.

[38] Yan RS, Zhang JH, Zhou Y. Red culture and corporate green innovation: a study based on geographic location data of national martyrs' memorial facilities. Research and Development Management. 2024;(2):37-49.

[39] Yates JF, De Oliveira S. Culture and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2016; 136: 106-18.

[40] Yu HY, Wang M, Huang B. Performance volatility, executive change and cost stickiness. Management Science. 2019;(2):135-47.

[41] Alchian AA. Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy. 1950; 58(3): 211-21.

[42] Yan RS, Zhang JH, Zhou Y. Red culture and corporate green innovation: a study based on geographic location data of national martyrs' memorial facilities. Research and Development Management. 2024;(2):37-49.

[43] Rothstein B. The quality of government: corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2011.

[44] Liu HF. Mao Zedong's “gift concept” and its implications for the construction of clean politics. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition). 2021;(2):28-36.

[45] Zhao WW, Bai YS. The occurrence and institutional impact of corruption in resource development process. Resource Science. 2020;(2):251-61.

[46] Popescu AI, Kelley C. Corrupt practices versus a sound business environment: learning from the US experience. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013; 92: 741-6.

[47] Wu Y, Rui M. Regional corruption, marketization, and China’s economic growth. Management World. 2010;(11):10-7,27.

[48] Xiang JQ, Li MJ. On the institutional foundation of clean politics. Theory and Reform. 2014;(3):31-5.

[49] Huang S, Ge W, Xu X. Bureaucracy–business relationship, corruption and the implications for marketization. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2024;52(3):634-44.

[50] DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review. 1983;48(2):147-60.

[51] Dyreng SD, Mayew WJ, Williams CD. Religious social norms and corporate financial reporting. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 2012;39(7-8):845-75.

[52] Tang J, Liu A, Gu J, Liu H. Can CEO environmental awareness promote new product development performance? Empirical research on Chinese manufacturing firms. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2024; 33: 985-1003.

[53] Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In: Corporate governance. 2019. p. 77-132.

[54] Brunnermeier SB, Cohen MA. Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2003; 45(2): 278-93.

[55] Jiang Z, Cui Y, Wang L, Zhou W. Sustain the red legacy: imprinting of red cultural and individual charitable donation. Systems Engineering – Theory and Practice. 2023;43(11):3129-44.

[56] Yu W, Weng RY, Chen QP. Research on red cultural factors in the philanthropic behavior of private enterprises. Southern Economy. 2020;(4):100-14.

[57] Xu J, Guan J, Lin Y. Institutional pressure, executive environmental awareness and corporate green innovation practices: based on the perspectives of new institutionalism theory and higher order theory. Management Review. 2017; 29: 72-83.

[58] Zhang C, Zhou B, Tian X. Political connections and green innovation: the role of a corporate entrepreneurship strategy in state-owned enterprises. Journal of Business Research. 2022:375-84.

[59] Hambrick DC, Mason PA. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review. 1984;9(2):193-206.

[60] Xu XX, Long ZN, Li WL. Confucian culture and corporate charitable giving. Foreign Economics and Management. 2020;(2):124-36.

[61] DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (translated by G. Yudin). Journal of Economic Sociology. 2010;(1):34-56.

[62] Andreoni A, Chang HJ. The political economy of industrial policy: structural interdependencies, policy alignment and conflict management. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2019; 48: 136-50.

[63] Wu Y. Fiscal decentralization, corruption and governance. Economic Quarterly. 2008;(3):1045-60.

[64] Zhu JS, Liu YY, Zheng X. Does peer-to-peer green transformation force firms to green innovation: a spillover effect analysis based on text mining. Journal of Systems Management. 2025:1-23.

[65] Chen D, Hu X, Liang S. Religious tradition and corporate governance. Economic Research Journal. 2013;48(9):71-84.

[66] Xu X, Li W. Confucian tradition and corporate innovation: the power of culture. Journal of Financial Research. 2019;(9):112-30.

[67] Shen N, Zhou JJ. A study on China’s green innovation efficiency evaluation and functional mechanism based on hybrid DEA and SEM model. Journal of Management Engineering. 2018;(4):46-53.

[68] Wang XT, Zhou YQ, Shi XF. Informal institutions and corporate innovation: a perspective from red culture. Heliyon. 2024;10(11): e32049.

[69] Li Y, Xu X. Does religious culture matter for corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2020;27(5):511-30.

[70] Lin Y, Lin L, Liu W. Marketization, financial development and regional innovation capability: research on the mediating effect of entrepreneurship. Science and Technology Management Research. 2022;42(9):46-55.

[71] Leiter AM, Parolini A, Winner H. Environmental regulation and investment: evidence from European industry data. Ecological Economics. 2011;70(4):759-70.

[72] Bian C, Chu ZP, Sun ZL. Environmental regulation, green credit, and enterprise green technology innovation policy simulation: an evolutionary game perspective of government intervention. Management Review. 2022;34(10):122-33.

[73] Twum AK, Zhang J, Ding X, Cobbinah J. Advancing renewable energy strategies towards sustainable development goal 13: insights from belt and road initiative (BRI) countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2024:1-32.

[74] Deng D, Wang M. Informal institutions and governance: a comparative research framework—frontier theory, Chinese practice and research prospects. Theoretical Exploration. 2023;(1):36-47.

[75] Allen F, Qian J, Qian M. Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics. 2005;77(1):57-116.

[76] Williamson OE. The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature. 2000;38(3):595-613.

[77] Puffer SM, McCarthy DJ, Boisot M. Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: the impact of formal institutional voids. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2010; 34(3): 441-67.

Downloads

Published

09-02-2026

Issue

Section

Articles