Bionic Parameter Extraction for Robotic Fish Design: A Reverse-Engineering Approach Using Large Yellow Croaker

Authors

  • Zhixin Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/4kv09v02

Keywords:

Large yellow croaker; fish body wave equation; digital image processing; parameter extraction; biomimetic robotic fish.

Abstract

The bionic research on fish swimming is the theoretical basis for the design of robotic fish. Accurately extracting the parameters of the fish body wave equation is the key to achieving efficient biomimetic motion. This study adopted an innovative reverse parameter extraction method to accurately quantify the hydrodynamic characteristics of fish swimming based on real biological fish motion data. Five adult yellow croakers (Larimichthys crocea) were selected as experimental subjects. Continuous video capture was conducted for 7 hours at a sampling rate of 30 fps in a constant-temperature two-dimensional water environment. By utilizing OpenCV digital image processing technology, an automatic extraction workflow was established to convert the original video into the centerline of the fish body, including key steps such as grayscale conversion and skeleton extraction. On this basis, using the Lighthill slender body theory framework, the key parameters in the fish wave equation were accurately determined through point marking, coordinate transformation, and discrete fitting methods. The experimental results show that the tail beat period of the large yellow croaker is 0.5s (frequency f=2Hz), the maximum amplitude of tail beat A is 3.25cm, and the amplitude to body length ratio is 2A/L ≈ 0.19, which conforms to biological laws; The average swimming speed U is 13.3cm/s, with a slip ratio of 0.86, which is in line with theoretical expectations; The parameters of the fish body wave equation obtained through envelope fitting are C ₁=-0.075, C ₂=0.5, k=10, and ω=4 π. The waveform reconstructed based on these parameters in MATLAB has high similarity with the actual swimming motion of the large yellow croaker, verifying the accuracy of the fitting. The fish body wave parameters obtained by this method lay a reliable biological foundation for the subsequent precise design of the robotic yellow croaker.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Breder, C. M. (1926). The locomotion of fishes. Zoologica, 4. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.203769.

[2] Lindsey, C. C. (1978). Form, function, and locomotory habits in fish. Fish Physiology, 7, 1–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1546-5098(08)60163-6

[3] Webb, P. W. (1984). Form and function in fish swimming. Scientific American, 251(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0784-72

[4] Sfakiotakis, M., Lane, D. M., & Davies, J. B. C. (1999). Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 24(2), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1109/48.757275

[5] Smits, A. J. (2019). Undulatory and oscillatory swimming. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 874. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.284

[6] Lighthill, M. J. (1960). Note on the swimming of slender fish. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 9(2), 305–317.

[7] Lighthill, M. J. (1971). Large-amplitude elongated-body theory of fish locomotion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 179(1055), 125–138.

[8] Taylor, G. (1952). Analysis of the swimming of long and narrow animals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 214(1117), 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1952.0159

[9] Videler, J. J., & Wardle, C. S. (1991). Fish swimming stride by stride: Speed limits and endurance. Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries, 1(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042660

[10] Wardle, C. S., Videler, J. J., & Altringham, J. D. (1995). Tuning in to fish swimming waves: Body form, swimming mode and muscle function. Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11] Videler, J. J. (1980). Fish swimming.

[12] Videler, J. J., & Hess, F. (1984). Fast continuous swimming of two pelagic predators, saithe (Pollachius virens) and mackerel (Scomber scombrus): A kinematic analysis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 109, 209. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.109.1.209

[13] Borazjani, I., & Sotiropoulos, F. (2008). Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamics of carangiform swimming in the transitional and inertial flow regimes. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211(Pt 10), 1541–1558. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.015644

[14] Du, R., Li, Z., & Wang, S. (2015). Robot fish: Bio-inspired fishlike underwater robots. Springer.

[15] Qashlim, A., Basri, B., & Haeruddin, H. (2020). Smartphone technology applications for milkfish image segmentation using OpenCV library. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(8), 150. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i08.12423

[16] Zeng, J., Long, F., & Wang, J. (2022). GWAS reveals heritable individual variations in the inherent swimming performance of juvenile large yellow croaker. Aquaculture, 559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738419

Downloads

Published

08-06-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, Z. (2026). Bionic Parameter Extraction for Robotic Fish Design: A Reverse-Engineering Approach Using Large Yellow Croaker. Journal of Innovation and Development, 15(3), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.54097/4kv09v02