The Implementation and Performance of Nike’s Sustainable Supply Chain Strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/cm3zq114Keywords:
sustainable development, supply chain strategic, financial performance.Abstract
Driven by the global carbon neutrality goal and the growing popularity of the ESG concept, corporate sustainable development has become a key concern for academia and practitioners. This paper takes Nike Company as the research object to analyze the implementation motivation, implementation path, and performance of its sustainable supply chain strategy. The results show that Nike has established a relatively comprehensive sustainable supply chain system covering green raw material procurement, production emission reduction upgrading, full-lifecycle supplier management and circular economy development under its Move to Zero strategy. During the strategy implementation process, the company advances green transformation via supply chain collaboration, technological innovation and multi-stakeholder cooperation. From the perspective of performance, sustainable supply chain strategy not only promotes the growth of business income and operational efficiency but also enhances brand value, market competitiveness, and supply chain resilience. This study enriches relevant research on the sportswear industry and provides references for multinational enterprises to comply with international ESG rules and achieve long-term sustainable development.
Downloads
References
[1] Pizzi, S., Principale, S., Fasiello, R. et al. (2023) The Institutionalization of Social and Environmental Accounting Practices in Europe. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(5), 816-838.
[2] Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., Tang, D.Y. et al. (2024) The Effects of Mandatory ESG Disclosure Around the World. Journal of Accounting Research, 62(5), 1795-1847.
[3] Lopes, J.M., Gomes, S. and Trancoso, T. (2024) Navigating the Green Maze: Insights for Businesses on Consumer Decision-Making and the Mediating Role of Their Environmental Concerns. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(4), 861-883.
[4] Jum’a, L., Zimon, D., Sroufe, R. et al. (2024) Sustainable Supply Chain Management’s Impact on Triple Bottom Line Performance: Does the Firm Size Matter? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 4673-4693.
[5] Agyabeng-Mensah, E., Ahenkorah, E.N.K. and Afum, E. (2024) Stakeholder Pressure and Circular Supply Chain Practices: Moderating Roles of Environmental Information Exchange Capability and Circular Innovation Orientation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(6), 5703-5720.
[6] Baah, C., Acquah, I.S.K. and Ofori, D. (2022) Exploring the Influence of Supply Chain Collaboration on Supply Chain Visibility, Stakeholder Trust, Environmental and Financial Performances: A Partial Least Squares Approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(1), 172-193.
[7] Huang, X., Ullah, M., Wang, L. et al. (2024) Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Triple Bottom Line Performance: Insights from an Emerging Economy with a Mediating and Moderating Model. Journal of Environmental Management, 357, 120575.
[8] Yu, H., Ahn, M. and Han, E. (2023) Key Driver of Textile and Apparel Industry Management: Fashion Brand ESG and Brand Reputation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1140004.
[9] Paluš, H., Parobek, J., Slašt’anová, N. et al. (2024) Green Supply Chains and Their Influence on the Competitiveness and Economic Performance of Companies. SAGE Open, 14(3), 21582440241271070.
[10] Hulkó, G., Kálmán, J. and Lapsánszky, A. (2026) Financial Supervision for the Green Transition: Comparative Insights From the EU, Hungary, and Singapore. Thunderbird International Business Review, 68(3), 357-366
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

