High-Dimensional Covariance Denoising and Geometric Robustness: A Statistical Framework for Portfolio Stability

Authors

  • Yuxuan Fang Department of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/3bv31503

Keywords:

High-dimensional covariance estimation, Robust estimation, Portfolio optimization.

Abstract

In high-dimensional financial settings, covariance matrix estimation suffers from the curse of dimensionality and parameter instability, which substantially limit the practical effectiveness of the Markowitz mean–variance framework. To address this issue, this paper constructs a "covariance estimation - portfolio strategy" collaborative framework, systematically examining the performance differences of four classic methods - sample covariance, shrinkage estimation, MCD robust estimation, and Tyler M-estimation in global minimum variance portfolios, mean-variance portfolios, and risk parity portfolios, to enhance the stability of investment portfolios in high-dimensional, noisy, and heavy-tailed environments. The empirical analysis covers three scenarios: ideal Gaussian distribution, contaminated data scenario, and resampling of the S&P 500 real market data, and uses estimation error, Sharpe ratio, maximum drawdown, Sortino ratio, and the time series stability of portfolio weights as evaluation metrics. Simulation experiments show that in the contaminated data environment, the estimation error of MCD and Tyler estimators is significantly lower than that of sample covariance and shrinkage estimation, demonstrating stronger robustness against outliers; real market backtesting further reveals that embedding robust covariance estimation into low-sensitivity optimization models such as risk parity and global minimum variance substantially reduces the time series fluctuations of portfolio weights and improves risk-adjusted returns, where the Risk Parity_Shrinkage and Risk Parity_Robust strategies outperform traditional benchmark portfolios in Sharpe ratio, maximum drawdown, and stability indicators. The research shows that the "estimator- strategy" adaptation framework is an effective paradigm for eliminating high-dimensional estimation errors and enhancing strategy resilience. This framework offers practical value for high-dimensional asset allocation, quantitative strategy development, and systemic risk prevention and mitigation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Markowitz H. Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1): 77-91.

[2] Li H, Liu L, Xia N, et al. High-dimensional expected utility portfolios under the spiked covariance model. Finance Research Letters, 2026, 93: 109637.

[3] Bodnar T, Okhrin Y, Parolya N. Optimal shrinkage-based portfolio selection in high dimensions. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2023, 41(1): 140-156.

[4] Michaud R O. The Markowitz optimization enigma: Is ‘optimized’ optimal. Financial Analysts Journal, 1989, 45(1): 31-42.

[5] Ledoit O, Wolf M. A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 2004, 88(2): 365-411.

[6] Tyler D E. A distribution-free M-estimator of multivariate scatter. The Annals of Statistics, 1987: 234-251.

[7] Rousseeuw P J, Van Driessen K. A fast algorithm for the minimum covariance determinant estimator. Technometrics, 1999, 41(3): 212-223.

[8] Shi F, Shu L, Gu X. A robust latent factor model for high-dimensional portfolio selection. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2025, 83: 101623.

[9] Zhu Z, Welsch R E. Robust dependence modeling for high-dimensional covariance matrices with financial applications. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2018, 12(2): 1228-1249.

[10] Choueifaty Y, Coignard Y. Toward maximum diversification. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 2008, 35(1): 40-51.

[11] Maillard S, Roncalli T, Teïletche J. The properties of equally weighted risk contribution portfolios. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 2010, 36(4): 60-70.

[12] Laloux L, Cizeau P, Potters M, et al. Random matrix theory and financial correlations. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 2000, 3(3): 391-397.

[13] Jay E, Soler T, Terreaux E, et al. Improving portfolios global performance using a cleaned and robust covariance matrix estimate. Annals of Operations Research, 2020: 1-24.

[14] Vanni F, Hitaj A, Mastrogiacomo E. Enhancing portfolio allocation: A random matrix theory perspective. Mathematics, 2024, 12(9): 1389.

Downloads

Published

14-09-2026

Issue

Section

Articles