How AI Leadership Stimulates Employees' Proactive Innovation Behavior: A Model with Self-Efficacy as a Mediator
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/p6qz0g77Keywords:
AI leadership, self-efficacy, proactive innovation behavior, human-AI collaboration, social cognitive theory, digital transformation.Abstract
Against the backdrop of digital-intelligent transformation, the deep integration of AI into organizational management has given rise to AI leadership as a new leadership paradigm. Drawing on social cognitive theory, this study examines how AI leadership affects employees' proactive innovation behavior through self-efficacy and whether cognitive flexibility serves as a boundary condition. Data were collected from 170 employees through an online survey and analyzed using hierarchical regression and Bootstrap tests. The results show that AI leadership significantly and positively predicts proactive innovation behavior, while self-efficacy partially mediates this relationship by strengthening employees' confidence in digital technology use and innovation. The hypothesized moderating effect of cognitive flexibility is not supported. The study extends social cognitive theory to human-AI collaborative management and clarifies a micro-level cognitive pathway through which AI leadership promotes employee innovation.
Downloads
References
[1] Fang X, Xie P, Lu L, et al. The mechanism through which AI leadership affects digital innovation [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2026, 23(3): 439–450.
[2] Zhang H, Gao Z, Li H. Gain or depletion: The double-edged effect of artificial intelligence application on employee innovative behavior [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2023, 40(18): 1–11.
[3] Si X, Zhang Q. Coordinated development of AI leadership and 'three-dimensional progress' in the intelligent era [J]. Tsinghua Business Review, 2026, (Z1): 30–37.
[4] Hu J, Ren Y. Talent incentives, corporate innovation performance, and distortion of innovation structure: A quasi-natural experiment based on urban talent attraction [J]. Management Review, 2024, 36(4): 100–114.
[5] Lin X, Luan Y, Zhao K, et al. A meta-analysis of the relationship between leadership styles and employee innovation performance: A self-determination perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 781–801.
[6] Gao Z, Zhang H. Leader AI symbolization and employee digital creativity: Based on cognitive-affective personality system theory [J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics: 1–16.
[7] Xie P, Ma L, Wei Y. The mechanism through which digital technology training affects employee digital creativity [J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2026, 40(1): 74–86.
[8] Van Quaquebeke N, Gerpott F H. The Now, New, and Next of Digital Leadership: How Artificial Intelligence (AI) Will Take Over and Change Leadership as We Know It [J]. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2023, 30(3): 265–275.
[9] Gao Q, Huang B. Effects of employee–organization relationships on scientific research innovation performance from the perspective of social exchange theory [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2022, 42(4): 125–132.
[10] Zhang Z, Zheng X, Zhong J. Leadership research from a human-computer interaction perspective [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2025, 42(10): 116–126.
[11] Zhang Z, Zheng X. Digital leadership: Structural dimensions and scale development [J]. Business and Management Journal, 2023, 45(11): 152–168.
[12] Aziz M F, Rajesh J I, Jahan F, et al. AI-powered leadership: A systematic literature review [J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2024, 40(5): 604–630.
[13] Zhao B, Han P. A grounded-theory study of the dual-path generation mechanism of employee proactive innovation behavior [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2016, 13(7): 1003–1011.
[14] Lee H W, Pak J, Kim S, et al. Effects of Human Resource Management Systems on Employee Proactivity and Group Innovation [J]. Journal of Management, 2019, 45(2): 819–846.
[15] Yang C, Tang D, Mei J. Abusive supervision and employee proactive innovation behavior: Perspectives of motivation and capability beliefs [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2021, 38(3): 143–150.
[16] Zhang Z, Yu C, Li Y. Proactive personality, knowledge sharing, and employee innovative behavior [J]. Management Review, 2016, 28(4): 123–133.
[17] Xu B, Deng C, Wu H. Leader-member exchange and employee proactive innovation behavior: A mediated moderation model [J]. Journal of Management Science, 2021, 34(2): 44–55.
[18] Liang Y, Hu F, Wu C. How digital-intelligent leadership affects employee digital-intelligent job crafting: A serial mediation model [J]. Soft Science, 2026, 40(3): 19–26.
[19] Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory [Z]. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1986: xiii, 617–xiii.
[20] Bandura A, Adams N E, Beyer J. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35(3): 125–139.
[21] Gu Y, Peng J. The effect of organizational innovation climate on employee innovative behavior: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy [J]. Nankai Business Review, 2010, 13(1): 30–41.
[22] Gao Z, Zhang H. Leader AI symbolization and AI-driven employee innovative behavior: A moderated dual-mediation model [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2025, 42(21): 151–160.
[23] Martin M M, Rubin R B. A New Measure of Cognitive Flexibility [J]. Psychological Reports, 1995, 76(2): 623–626.
[24] Luo J, Zhao L, Zhong J. The mechanism through which ambidextrous leadership affects employee innovative behavior [J]. Forecasting, 2016, 35(4): 1–7.
[25] Ling Y, Zhou J, Chen A. How employee–AI collaboration affects employee agility: A cognitive-affective dual-path mechanism [J]. Human Resources Development of China, 2026, 43(7): 6–21.
[26] Santana A N D, Roazzi A, Nobre A P M C. The relationship between cognitive flexibility and mathematical performance in children: A meta-analysis [J]. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2022, 28: 100179.
[27] Bandura A. Social learning theory of aggression [Z]. Blackwell Publishing, 1978: 12–29. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x.
[28] Zhou W, Guo G. Self-efficacy: Concept, theory, and application [J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2006, (1): 91–97.
[29] Ye H, Zhang P, Wang Y, et al. The double-edged mechanism of perceived AI creativity on employee innovative behavior [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2025, 22(9): 1646–1656.
[30] Li Z, Zhu X, Guo J. The effect of human-AI collaboration on employee job crafting in AI application scenarios: The mediating role of psychological empowerment [J]. China Personnel Science, 2023, (9): 35–45.
[31] Rama, Nayak C, Agarwal R K. A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations [C], 2011.
[32] Cai W, Yu X. Proactive change or passive response? The effect of AI assistant intelligence on employee job crafting [J]. Soft Science, 2024, 38(12): 1–6+25.
[33] Niu L, Zhang G, Zhao R, et al. The dual impact mechanism of employee threat perception on thriving at work in the context of AI embedding [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2026, 43(4): 109–117.
[34] Liu Z, Xu Y, Xu J, et al. Innovation aspiration gaps and team breakthrough innovation: A self-regulation theory perspective [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(2): 272–285.
[35] Liang Y, Yang M, Wu T-J. Double-edged sword effect of employee–AI collaboration: The role of AI uncertainty and digital leadership [J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2025, 46(6): 943–962.
[36] Gong Y. Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy [J]. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 2010, 24(2).
[37] Kim M, Oh J, Kim B. Experience of digital music services and digital self-efficacy among older adults: Enjoyment and anxiety as mediators [J]. Technology in Society, 2021, 67.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
